• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Collecting Evidence in Switzerland – Dos and Don’ts

A number of States, including Switzerland, have enacted blocking statutes which may hinder or prevent the taking of evidence for use in foreign court proceedings involving civil matters.

Switzerland has very strict rules on giving evidence in foreign court proceedings. If these rules are not respected there are potential criminal consequences for any person who carries out activities that are the responsibility of a Swiss public authority or official.

Obtaining evidence in Switzerland by a foreign authority (witness statements, production of documents, expert opinion, including the conduct of a hearing by video conference of a party or witness located in Switzerland for instance) constitutes an international judicial assistance act by a public authority on Swiss territory and is therefore prohibited unless authorised.

Switzerland is a contracting State to the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (“the Hague Evidence Convention”). It makes provision for obtaining evidence by means of letters of request and through diplomatic or consular officers and through commissioners.

Where the Hague Evidence Convention does not apply and where there are no relevant bilateral agreements, Switzerland applies the Hague Convention relating to civil procedure of 1 March 1954 (the “1954 Hague Convention”).

Letters of Request

Under the Hague Evidence Convention, the judicial authority (not a private person e.g. a lawyer) of a Contracting State may issue a letter of request to the competent authority of Switzerland to obtain evidence.

As Switzerland is a federal State with 26 cantons, the cantonal Central Authority of the canton in which the request is to be executed is the receiving authority. Such applications may, however, be submitted to the Federal Office of Justice, who will transfer them to the competent cantonal Central Authority.

Under the 1954 Hague Convention, the letters of request procedure must also be issued by a judicial authority. However, the foreign judicial authority must send its application to the diplomatic representation of its nation in Switzerland. That diplomatic representation will send the application to the Federal Office of Justice who will, in turn, forward it to the competent cantonal authority.

The requesting party may ask a Swiss judge to oversee the collection or review of evidence, or for the authorities to approve the appointment of a Commissioner, usually a Swiss attorney. The appointment of a Commissioner usually translates into a speedier collection of evidence.

Can evidence be collected by diplomatic officers or consular agents?

Obtaining evidence, in Switzerland, through foreign diplomatic or consular officers is generally reserved to (i) the area where the diplomatic officer/consular agent/commissioner exercises his functions, (ii) nationals of a state which the state represents, (iii) proceedings commenced in the courts of that state. Prior authorisation of the Swiss Federal Department of Justice and the cantonal authority is required.

The application for judicial assistance must be sent to the cantonal Central Authority in which the documents, data or witnesses are located.

Can Special Authorisation be obtained?

Even under urgent circumstances, it is difficult to obtain authorisation at short notice but there are exceptions. The Swiss authorities will not grant authorisation if the request is outside the scope of the rules on international judicial assistance. If granted, the authorisation is valid for a limited time and may be revoked.

Are there any cases in which procedures for assistance do not need to be followed?

Where a party is domiciled in Switzerland and required to provide evidence, to fill in a questionnaire, or to appear before a foreign court, letters of request are not necessary if the refusal to cooperate leads only to consequences of a procedural nature (e.g. a factual claim of the other party is accepted as true or the loss of the right to prove the claim at a later stage). The relevant party is free to cooperate. The service of this type of invitation must, however, be carried out according to the proper procedure for judicial assistance.

Where the person to whom the invitation is directed is not party to the proceedings but a third party (witness, expert, etc.), that person may not be considered as a subject of the foreign court’s jurisdiction. In such cases, the foreign authority must also follow the procedure for judicial assistance. However, the mere invitation to go abroad is not subject to the procedure for judicial assistance provided that it is not accompanied by any kind of coercive measure.

How can we help?

Particular caution must be paid to the strict rules of collecting evidence in Switzerland, as breaching it constitutes a criminal offence. Foreign parties (including foreign lawyers, bankruptcy receivers or investigation companies) may underestimate the difficulties Swiss law will cause when attempting to gather evidence or examine a witness in Switzerland. The consent of private persons cannot exempt the person performing the act in favour of a foreign state from conviction.

Transferring data abroad, or submitting it to foreign courts, may also trigger other legal considerations such as data protection, banking secrecy laws and legal privilege under Swiss law.

There are several ways to obtain evidence and examine witnesses located in Switzerland in compliance with Swiss law. A careful assessment is therefore required to determine whether the mechanics of international judicial assistance must be followed, whether authorisation to collect evidence is likely to be granted and whether an appointment of a Swiss based Commissioner would assist with the collection of evidence or examining a witness.


This article was written by Michael Wells-Greco. For more information please contact Michael on +41 (0)22 591 18 80 / Michael.Wells-Greco@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands presence in Greater China with the arrival of Litigation and Dispute Resolution Partner Stephen Chan

    Stephen Chan

    News

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • New Hong Kong crypto regime: trading platforms falling foul already?

    Patrick Chan

    Insights

  • What next for HS2?

    Richard Flenley

    Quick Reads

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Mediation as a pillar of dispute resolution: it’s happening, embrace it

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Hong Kong’s top court makes declaration in favour of same-sex partnerships

    Lisa Wong

    Insights

  • A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

    Rory Partridge

    Quick Reads

  • Common construction claims in Bahrain

    Mazin Al Mardhi

    Insights

  • EG quotes Alison Goldthorp on WeWork's restructuring plans

    Alison Goldthorp

    In the Press

  • Sarah Higgins and David Wells-Cole write for Wealth Briefing on the pitfalls of using unregulated legal services

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments - UAE: DIFC

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • 5 top tips to make estate administration easier for your executor

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • Case analysis: URS Corporation Ltd V BDW Trading Ltd

    James Worthington

    Insights

  • Financial Reporter quotes Rhys Novak on a new FCA review into the treatment of PEPs

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • First time buyers relief and trusts

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Enforcement of Judgments

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Julia Cox on tax planning under a potential Labour government

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • The Times quotes Suzanne Marriott on the legal ramifications of stolen artefacts

    Suzanne Marriott

    In the Press

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The Supreme Court's decision in PACCAR: litigation funding stopped in its trucks?

    Hanh Nguyen

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes James Riby on London’s reputation as ‘divorce capital’ of the world

    James Riby

    In the Press

  • Inside Britney and Sam’s $10m prenup

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • Investigating fraud: an expansion of legal professional privilege?

    Simon Heatley

    Insights

  • The i quotes Katie Talbot on the merits of putting a life insurance policy into a trust

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • NSPCC urges Government to protect children from domestic abuse during holidays

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • A brief look at HMRC v A Taxpayer [2023] UKUT 00182 (TCC)

    Dominic Lawrance

    Quick Reads

  • An exceptionally harsh judgment? Exceptional circumstances revisited

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • ATED and the farmhouse

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Atonement and post separation endeavour: wife keeps £1m gift from husband after his affair and will receive a share of his business’ future profits

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • Pensions: change is in the air once again

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Pre-Settled Status to be automatically extended by two years

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Pandora Papers: HMRC nudge taxpayers to come out of their box

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

Back to top