• news-banner

    Expert Insights

End of the “No Consent Regime”? Implications for Cyber Fraud Victims and Financial Institutions

In Tam Sze Leung & Ors v Commissioner of Police [2021] HKCFI 3118, the Court of First Instance held that the Hong Kong Police’s practice of issuing “Letters of No Consent” (“LNCs”) to banks and financial institutions to informally freeze bank accounts suspected of containing proceeds of crime (“the No Consent Regime”) is unconstitutional.

Considering the prevalence of cyber fraud in Hong Kong, such judicial development may have far-reaching implications on how victims could seek recovery of funds and how financial institutions should manage financial crime risks.

Facts

The Applicants in Tam Sze Leung were subject to the Securities and Futures Commission’s investigation for suspected stock market manipulation. The Police informed the relevant banks of the suspected unlawful activity and requested the banks to file suspicious transaction reports (“STRs”) so that the Commissioner of Police (“Commissioner”) could issue LNCs. LNCs were then issued and remained in place for a period of roughly 10 months, causing the Applicants’ bank accounts to be frozen.

The Applicants challenged the constitutionality of the No Consent Regime by way of judicial review. The Court held that the Commissioner’s No Consent Regime as operated is (1) ultra vires; (2) not prescribed by law; and (3) a disproportionate interference with rights, in particular the right to the use of property.

What is the No Consent Regime?

Under s. 25 of the Organised Serious Crimes Ordinance (Cap. 455) (“OSCO”), it is an offence to deal with property known or reasonably believed to represent proceeds of crime. s. 25A of the OSCO requires any person to make a disclosure to the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit by STRs if they know or suspect the property to be proceeds of crime.

In practice, the filing of STRs would trigger the Commissioner to issue LNCs to banks and financial institutions, stating that the Commissioner does not give the financial institution consent to deal with the funds. The issuance of LNCs would in effect procure the financial institution to freeze the relevant accounts, and in doing so provide a cost-effective measure for cyber fraud victims to preserve traceable assets at an early stage of investigation.

The way forward following Tam Sze Leung

Despite holding the No Consent Regime to be unlawful, the Court has not yet granted any relief to the parties in Tam Sze Leung and the case may be subject to appeal. Furthermore, the legislature or the Law Reform Commission may suggest amendments to the No Consent Regime to render it compatible with the present constitutional framework. The full ramifications of Tam Sze Leung are yet to be seen.

Banks and financial institutions

Meanwhile, banks and financial institutions remain obliged to comply with the OSCO. Bearing in mind the possible criminal liability, following Tam Sze Leung, banks and financial institutions should continue to carry out stringent assessments on transactions, make disclosures on suspected proceeds of crime, and exercise independent judgment on whether to freeze suspicious bank accounts.

Victims of cyber fraud

It is important to seek prompt legal advice if you discover you (or your business) are the victim of a cyber fraud. Pending a decision from a higher court and/or amendments to the No Consent Regime, cyber fraud victims may no longer rely on the informal freeze under the issuance of LNCs. They should give due consideration in resorting to alternative means of preserving traceable assets at an early stage.

Experience shows that the first 24 hours after any unauthorised transfer is the “golden period” for recovery of funds. Victims of cyber fraud should consider taking the steps below immediately upon discovery of a fraud:

  • Contact the transferring bank to request a stop on the transfer, or to request a recall of the transfer;
  • Report the fraud to the police of where the transferring bank and receiving bank are situated;
  • Obtain a mareva (or freezing) injunction order to preserve traceable assets (and if necessary, on a worldwide scale); and
  • Commence civil proceedings without delay.

If you need any assistance on cyber fraud matters, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Our thinking

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Budget 2024 - IHT winners and losers

    Julia Cox

    Quick Reads

  • Succession and tax strategy for farmers and business owners post-Budget

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • The reform of litigation funding edges closer as CJC report is published

    James Walton

    Insights

  • Sophie Dworetzsky writes for Tax Journal on the proposed new foreign income and gains (FIG) regime announced in the UK budget

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • The Financial Times and Bloomberg quote Dominic Lawrance on the implications of the changes to the non-dom regime announced in the UK Budget

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • Consequences of the abolition of the non-dom regime and 30 October 2024 Budget: what are the family law issues for wealthy clients leaving the UK?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn budget - Capital Gains Tax increase and divorce settlements

    Sarah Higgins

    Quick Reads

  • Capital gains tax rises - our view

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • A chink of light in an otherwise gloomy budget for farmers and rural business owners?

    Katie Talbot

    Quick Reads

  • Tax treatment on pensions following the Budget and the impact on divorce settlements

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • To Trick or to Treat? - the not-so-spooky guide to navigating Halloween as co-parents

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Quick Reads

  • The Budget: further details on reforms to agricultural and business property emerge

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Private equity investments, divorce and the Budget....

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Farming Life quotes Sarah Wray on the reform of Agricultural Property Relief announced in the UK Budget and the impact on farmers and landowners

    Sarah Wray

    In the Press

  • IFA Magazine quotes Sophie Dworetzsky on the capital gains tax increases announced in the UK budget

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • The Budget: implications for agricultural property relief

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Domestic abuse in financial proceedings: A call from Resolution for a cultural shift

    Zandra Beaumont

    Quick Reads

  • Housing Today and Building Magazine quote William Marriott on what the UK Budget could mean for the property market

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • The Times quotes Naomi Nettleton on filming agreements in residential areas

    Naomi Nettleton

    In the Press

Back to top