• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Internal investigations - 7 tips on interviewing witnesses during the lockdown

As noted in the recent insight post on collating documents during the pandemic (link here), conducting internal investigations during the current crisis presents a number of significant barriers. 

Another example of these hurdles is the need to interview individuals who might have information or documents relevant to an investigation. Clearly face-to-face interviews are difficult, if not impossible, at the moment. 

Although the recent exponential rise of video conferencing apps such as WebEx and Zoom enable interviews to take place in as close to ideal circumstances as possible at the moment, there are a number of points to be aware of.  Ultimately, the information obtained (and maybe even the interview content itself, if it is recorded) might be deployed, either voluntarily or under compulsion, in response to an inquiry or demand from a regulator or law enforcement agency.  It is therefore important to consider a number of issues very carefully.       

Here are 7 tips for running effective interviews during the outbreak.

  1. Prepare prepare prepare – planning is crucial. Plan, re-plan and plan again. Adequate time must be spent preparing for each interview and, indeed, planning the overall strategic approach.  For example, it may be the case that starting interviews with the most junior employee and working up to the most senior is appropriate so that, when one speaks to the more senior people involved, one has a fuller picture. Build in time for repeat interviews given that later interviews can mean an individual who has already been interviewed should be interviewed again.  
  2. Prepare documents in advance including how these are to be shared. Consider whether you want to provide documents in advance (in which case ensure any confidentiality is preserved and use a system where it is easy to direct the individual to particular documents or pages) or whether you wish to share documents during the interview itself.  If you decide to go the latter route, careful preparation is key including practising sharing documents over the relevant video-conferencing app. Whichever method is chosen, ensure that the dissemination of documents is permitted in the relevant jurisdictions and that relevant data protection regulations are complied with.  
  3. Do a trial run. This will ensure that all participants can access the necessary hardware, know how to use the video conferencing app, and have sufficient bandwidth on their Internet connection. 
  4. Have an alternative method of communication lined up. Even the best laid plans can fail at the last minute. Clearly the best method, apart from face-to-face “in person” interviews, is over live video, but have a back-up plan which may be audio-only.  It may be that you can reschedule a new time and date for the interview but that will not always be possible. 
  5. Ensure the video interview is “locked”. Ensure that no unauthorised access to the call is possible. Depending upon the app used, use unique IDs for each participant together with passcodes. Potentially set up a “waiting room” to check who is joining your meeting and when. “Lock” the interview once it has started to prevent any further participants from joining.
  6. Instruct the interviewee to find a private space for the interview. In this time of so many people working from home, many people have experienced an interruption to their video calls whether by pets, children or others. Make sure everyone on the call minimises the risk of distractions by finding as secure and private a spot in their home as possible. This is also important to preserve any legal privilege in the notes made of the interview. That privilege may be affected if others – such as spouses, children or flatmates - are in the same room or can otherwise hear the interview. At the beginning of the interview, interviewers should confirm that all participants are in a private location. Seek confirmation, at regular intervals throughout the interview, that no one else has entered the room. 
  7. Making a recording – consider this very carefully in advance. It is easier now to record interviews – many video-conferencing apps have that functionality. However, consider the pros and cons carefully and in advance. First, a threshold question. Is making a recording legally permissible in both your jurisdiction and, where it is different, the jurisdiction of the interviewee? Secondly, is the recording likely to be legally privileged? If there is a material risk that it might not be – and, at least in English law, there is - it might be considered best to rely solely on a lawyer’s notes of the interview. Thirdly, best practice demands that the individual be told of the recording. Consider how that might affect the interviewee’s responses and behaviour.

Running witness interviews during the pandemic is not easy. Provided, however, that all those concerned are competent with video conferencing apps and have applied their minds to logistics in advance of the interview, there is no reason why they cannot be effective.

To find out more on how we can help you, please visit our Investigations page.

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Has a new route to recovery opened up for victims of banking payment frauds?

    Katie Bewick

    Insights

  • New Tools for Fraud and Asset Tracing between Hong Kong and China?

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Thomas Snider, Reem Faqihi and Dalal Alhouti discuss the impact of technology on the arbitration landscape for Legal Community MENA

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Europlasma in takeover bid of MG-Valdunes

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Breaking Barriers: The Tech Revolution in Arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • Forbes quotes Gareth Mills on the US government’s antitrust lawsuit against Apple

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • The role of national courts in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expansion into Singapore accelerates with new Partner hire

    Peter Brabant

    News

  • Embracing AI's potential in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Thomas Snider, Patrick Gearon and Dalal Alhouti discuss the impact of AI on international arbitration for Legal Community MENA

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • Stewart Hey, Hugh Gunson and Rachel Warren write for Solicitor's Journal on the cum-cum scandal

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Drafting the “perfect” arbitration agreement

    Alim Khamis FCIArb

    Insights

  • Peter Smith shares his thoughts on digital asset disputes for Legal Community MENA

    Peter Smith

    In the Press

  • A Modern Marriage: How AI Powered By Blockchain Could Protect IP Rights

    Shennind Awat-Ranai

    Insights

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Dawn raids... a new dawn?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • Abu Dhabi’s New Arbitral Centre Unveils its Rules

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Nigeria's challenge to US$11 billion award succeeds in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales

    John Olatunji

    Quick Reads

  • An important reminder for employers on World Menopause Day

    Isobel Goodman

    Quick Reads

  • UAE Polishes Federal Arbitration Law

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • What next for HS2?

    Richard Flenley

    Quick Reads

  • Mediation as a pillar of dispute resolution: it’s happening, embrace it

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

    Rory Partridge

    Quick Reads

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Pandora Papers: HMRC nudge taxpayers to come out of their box

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • DIAC Issues First Annual Report

    Georgia Fullarton

    Quick Reads

  • Dispute Resolution: The Case for Mediation

    Marjan Mirrezaei

    Quick Reads

  • Machinery Regulations respond to the rise of AI

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

Back to top