Internal investigations - 7 tips on interviewing witnesses during the lockdown
As noted in the recent insight post on collating documents during the pandemic (link here), conducting internal investigations during the current crisis presents a number of significant barriers.
Another example of these hurdles is the need to interview individuals who might have information or documents relevant to an investigation. Clearly face-to-face interviews are difficult, if not impossible, at the moment.
Although the recent exponential rise of video conferencing apps such as WebEx and Zoom enable interviews to take place in as close to ideal circumstances as possible at the moment, there are a number of points to be aware of. Ultimately, the information obtained (and maybe even the interview content itself, if it is recorded) might be deployed, either voluntarily or under compulsion, in response to an inquiry or demand from a regulator or law enforcement agency. It is therefore important to consider a number of issues very carefully.
Here are 7 tips for running effective interviews during the outbreak.
- Prepare prepare prepare – planning is crucial. Plan, re-plan and plan again. Adequate time must be spent preparing for each interview and, indeed, planning the overall strategic approach. For example, it may be the case that starting interviews with the most junior employee and working up to the most senior is appropriate so that, when one speaks to the more senior people involved, one has a fuller picture. Build in time for repeat interviews given that later interviews can mean an individual who has already been interviewed should be interviewed again.
- Prepare documents in advance including how these are to be shared. Consider whether you want to provide documents in advance (in which case ensure any confidentiality is preserved and use a system where it is easy to direct the individual to particular documents or pages) or whether you wish to share documents during the interview itself. If you decide to go the latter route, careful preparation is key including practising sharing documents over the relevant video-conferencing app. Whichever method is chosen, ensure that the dissemination of documents is permitted in the relevant jurisdictions and that relevant data protection regulations are complied with.
- Do a trial run. This will ensure that all participants can access the necessary hardware, know how to use the video conferencing app, and have sufficient bandwidth on their Internet connection.
- Have an alternative method of communication lined up. Even the best laid plans can fail at the last minute. Clearly the best method, apart from face-to-face “in person” interviews, is over live video, but have a back-up plan which may be audio-only. It may be that you can reschedule a new time and date for the interview but that will not always be possible.
- Ensure the video interview is “locked”. Ensure that no unauthorised access to the call is possible. Depending upon the app used, use unique IDs for each participant together with passcodes. Potentially set up a “waiting room” to check who is joining your meeting and when. “Lock” the interview once it has started to prevent any further participants from joining.
- Instruct the interviewee to find a private space for the interview. In this time of so many people working from home, many people have experienced an interruption to their video calls whether by pets, children or others. Make sure everyone on the call minimises the risk of distractions by finding as secure and private a spot in their home as possible. This is also important to preserve any legal privilege in the notes made of the interview. That privilege may be affected if others – such as spouses, children or flatmates - are in the same room or can otherwise hear the interview. At the beginning of the interview, interviewers should confirm that all participants are in a private location. Seek confirmation, at regular intervals throughout the interview, that no one else has entered the room.
- Making a recording – consider this very carefully in advance. It is easier now to record interviews – many video-conferencing apps have that functionality. However, consider the pros and cons carefully and in advance. First, a threshold question. Is making a recording legally permissible in both your jurisdiction and, where it is different, the jurisdiction of the interviewee? Secondly, is the recording likely to be legally privileged? If there is a material risk that it might not be – and, at least in English law, there is - it might be considered best to rely solely on a lawyer’s notes of the interview. Thirdly, best practice demands that the individual be told of the recording. Consider how that might affect the interviewee’s responses and behaviour.
Running witness interviews during the pandemic is not easy. Provided, however, that all those concerned are competent with video conferencing apps and have applied their minds to logistics in advance of the interview, there is no reason why they cannot be effective.
To find out more on how we can help you, please visit our Investigations page.
LIDW21: A view from London and India - How dispute avoidance can keep construction and infrastructure plans on track
Join us as we discuss the challenges of the possible rise in disputes in the construction and infrastructure sector in India
The Lawyer, New Law Journal, International Adviser, CDR Magazine and eprivateclient report on the firm's partner promotions
Charles Russell Speechlys promoted five lawyers to partner, effective 1 May 2021.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
ICC 2021 Rules
The ICC has recently updated its rules for arbitration: the new rules entered into force on 1 January 2021 (the “2021 Rules”).
The Lugano convention – the journey continues
The UK’s departure from the European Union has had the effect of leaving the UK outside of the Lugano Convention of 2007.
Adding claimants pre-service and amending outside the limitation period: pitfalls for the unwary
Sonia looks at a recent High Court judgment and its important guidance on the ability of claimants to be added to a claim before service
Joe Edwards, Simon Heatley and Lauren Kelly write for Practical Law on damages-based agreements
Law firms entering damages-based agreements face a catch-22.
Damages-based agreements: an island of clarity in changing seas
Simon, Joe and Lauren look at a recent judgment which is a welcome island of clarity in the damages-based agreement sea of uncertainty.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Insolvency Legislation in the GCC
The interesting times of the last 14 months were preceded by the interesting times of the financial crisis of 2008/2009.
Guidance where Domestic Abuse alleged
Rhys Novak quoted by Citywealth on the ways companies can combat potential issues of fraud
Is fraud on the rise and should investors be wary?
Bribery & Corruption team successfully act in Italian bribery prosecution
Helen Coward, Hugh Gunson and Guy Bud write for Tax Journal on remuneration arrangements in partnerships with mixed membership
Odey Asset Management LLP and HFFX LLP consider the law relating to remuneration arrangements in partnerships with mixed membership.
Mind the gap? Enforcing transition-period UK judgments in Switzerland revisited
A decision on an application to apply the Lugano Convention after the end of the UK’s transition period.
The rise of cost sanctions in family law proceedings (even against successful parties!)
CIS General Insurance Limited v IBM United Kingdom Limited - An analysis
Slow and chaotic – lessons from a digital transformation disaster in CIS General Insurance Limited v IBM United Kingdom Limited.
Stewart Hey featured in The Lawyer's reporting on the post-Brexit disputes landscape in the UK
Post-Brexit, the importance of making sure contracts have certainty with regards to jurisdiction and enforcement has never been greater.
Ghassan El Daye
Ghassan El Daye quoted by The National on the Dubai courts rejection of Dh1.3m rent refund claim
A convenience shop in Dubai lost its claim to a rent refund of Dh1.3 million from its landlord on grounds of lost revenue during lockdown.
Warranties on an indemnity basis: a question of damages
John and Simon take an in-depth look at warranties on an indemnity basis