• news-banner

    Expert Insights

What happens if one party passes away during divorce proceedings?

With the exceedingly high death rate in the fifth wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong, people become more proactive in estate planning, such as making a Will. Indeed, what will happen if one party dies during a divorce proceeding?

If a spouse dies halfway through the divorce proceedings, the divorce proceeding will be abated. The surviving spouse will be considered as a widow or widower and may become the beneficiary of death benefits under intestacy if the deceased had not left a Will, or be left with nothing if the deceased had left a Will stating so.

According to the current intestacy laws in Hong Kong, if one dies leaving a spouse and two children, the first HK$500,000 of the deceased’s residuary estate plus all of their personal belongings will be given to the surviving spouse. Thereafter, the remaining residuary estate distribution will be given in the ratio of 50% to the surviving spouse and 25% to each of the surviving children. If the deceased dies before their spouse and their parents, the surviving spouse will be granted the first HK$1 million of the residuary estate plus all of the deceased’s personal belongings. The remaining value of the residuary estate will be distributed in the ratio of 50% to the surviving spouse and 50% to the deceased’s parents in equal shares.

Therefore, if the deceased had not left any Will, even though he or she might already be in divorce with the surviving spouse before he died, part of his or her estate will still go to the surviving spouse, regardless of the wishes of the deceased.

Things are different if the deceased spouse had left a valid Will. In that case, the deceased’s estate will be distributed according to his or her wishes as set out in the Will. He or she can leave nothing in the Will for the divorcing spouse, or even specify his intention not to leave any financial provision for the surviving spouse.

Having said that, in the event that the deceased spouse leaves no or insufficient financial provisions in the Will for the surviving spouse, he or she may make a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Ordinance, Cap 481 (the “Ordinance”) if the deceased was domiciled or was ordinarily resident for three years in Hong Kong immediately prior to his death.

According to the Ordinance, a dependant may make an application to the Court for “reasonable financial provision” from the deceased’s estate if the Will had made none, or insufficient provision for the dependant; or if the deceased did not prepare a Will and the dependent is not entitled to share the estate under intestacy rules.

In considering what constitutes as “reasonable financial provision” for a dependant and whether the surviving spouse is a dependant in the first place, the Court will question whether it is reasonable in all circumstances for them to receive such financial provision, regardless of whether the spouse needs such provision for his/her maintenance, and he or she must prove that the deceased had been maintaining him or her prior to the deceased’s death.

If the Court accepts the spouse’s application, it will have the power to grant orders for periodical payments and lump sum orders, as well as transfer and settlement of property orders from property comprised in the estate. It is possible for the Court to transfer the entire amount of income in the net estate to the surviving spouse, if deemed necessary. In reaching this conclusion, the court will consider similar factors as per applications for financial provision in divorce, such as:

a) the financial resources and financial needs which the applicant spouse has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;

b) the financial resources and financial needs which any other applicant has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;

c) the financial resources and financial needs which any beneficiary of the estate of the deceased has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;

d) any obligations and responsibilities which the deceased had towards any applicant or towards any beneficiary of the estate of the deceased;

e) the size and nature of the net estate of the deceased;

f) any physical or mental disability of any applicant for an order, or any beneficiary of the estate of the deceased;

g) any other matter, including the conduct of the applicant or any other person, which in the circumstances of the case the court may consider relevant.

It is worth noting that applicants who may issue applications pursuant to the Ordinance are not limited to surviving spouses. Family members who would otherwise be entitled to share the deceased’s estate under intestacy rules may commence proceedings. Individuals who have been maintained before the death of the deceased either wholly or substantially, such as the deceased’s parents, adult children, or siblings may also take out proceedings. Even if, for example, the deceased had an extra-marital affair, the boyfriend or girlfriend may issue proceedings as long as they can prove they were maintained by the deceased prior to their death. The Court will need to consider the needs of any other beneficiary of the estate as well, which usually makes matters much more complicated than in regular divorce proceedings.

Although there is a possibility that the surviving spouse may seek remedy under the Ordinance, and that one might wish to change their Will after the divorce is finalised, it is still advisable to have a Will done during your lifetime to ensure your wealth is passed on to people whom you wish to benefit after your death, such as your children or siblings. Whether you are in a happy relationship or going through divorce, discussing about death may seem grim. However, given the current chaos in the world, perhaps it is time to plan for the unknown.

Read Part II here: What happens if one party passes away during a divorce proceeding Part II

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2023

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • Dangers of trusts

    Mark Summers

    Events

  • China Daily, and other titles, quote Silvia On on trends affecting Chinese HNWIs

    Silvia On

    In the Press

  • New Hong Kong crypto regime: trading platforms falling foul already?

    Patrick Chan

    Insights

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Hong Kong’s top court makes declaration in favour of same-sex partnerships

    Lisa Wong

    Insights

  • Vanessa Duff writes for Wealth Briefing on how the Bank of Mum and Dad can help young people get on the property ladder

    Vanessa Duff

    In the Press

  • Sarah Higgins and David Wells-Cole write for Wealth Briefing on the pitfalls of using unregulated legal services

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • 5 top tips to make estate administration easier for your executor

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • Back to School: How should recently separated parents face the new term?

    David Hansford

    Quick Reads

  • Financial Reporter quotes Rhys Novak on a new FCA review into the treatment of PEPs

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • South China Morning Post quotes Lisa Wong on Hong Kong's surrogacy rules

    Lisa Wong

    In the Press

  • First time buyers relief and trusts

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Julia Cox on tax planning under a potential Labour government

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • The Times quotes Suzanne Marriott on the legal ramifications of stolen artefacts

    Suzanne Marriott

    In the Press

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The Financial Times quotes James Riby on London’s reputation as ‘divorce capital’ of the world

    James Riby

    In the Press

  • Inside Britney and Sam’s $10m prenup

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • Mind your Language !

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The i quotes Katie Talbot on the merits of putting a life insurance policy into a trust

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • NSPCC urges Government to protect children from domestic abuse during holidays

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • A brief look at HMRC v A Taxpayer [2023] UKUT 00182 (TCC)

    Dominic Lawrance

    Quick Reads

  • An exceptionally harsh judgment? Exceptional circumstances revisited

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Record success for Charles Russell Speechlys in Chambers High Net Worth 2023 directory

    Piers Master

    News

  • ATED and the farmhouse

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Million Dollar Footballer With No Assets?

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • Are Parental Rights Equal for All Families?

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Atonement and post separation endeavour: wife keeps £1m gift from husband after his affair and will receive a share of his business’ future profits

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • Pensions: change is in the air once again

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Pandora Papers: HMRC nudge taxpayers to come out of their box

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Can a financial claim in divorce proceed after the death of either party?

    Sarah Higgins

    Quick Reads

  • Second Time Weddings - Family Law (I) dos and don’ts

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Tina Turner: an inspiration praised for turning the tables on domestic violence

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

Back to top