• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Top 10 things you may not know about Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements

1. If done properly, the agreement will be enforced in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Court will give effect to an agreement so long as it is ‘fair’, neither party is left in a predicament of ‘real need’, and it was entered into with a full appreciation of its implications and with the benefit of independent legal advice.

2. A Hong Kong nuptial agreement is not the same as a marriage contract

In many European countries it is common to sign a marriage contract electing a matrimonial property regime shortly before the marriage which applies during the marriage, on divorce, and on death. The most common regimes are those of separate property and community property. If no election is made, a default regime will apply (usually one of community property).

Such documents are signed before a notary, without the benefit of financial disclosure or legal advice, and sometimes only a few hours before the wedding.

These contracts are not the same as nuptial agreements and are unlikely to be enforced in Hong Kong in the event of marital breakdown.

3. It’s never too late to have a nuptial agreement

Nobody wants to think about the possibility of things going wrong when planning a wedding, and unless family and friends have a prenuptial agreement, it is unlikely to be at the forefront of your mind.

If you didn’t have time, or simply did not think about having an agreement before the wedding, then you can still enter into a post-nuptial agreement, which is signed after the wedding. In fact, these agreements are often considered to be even more enforceable as it is harder to raise allegations of pressure.

If you have a foreign marriage contract or prenuptial agreement, it is essential to consider a Hong Kong post-nuptial agreement that meets the local requirements.

4. There is no ‘standard’ agreement

There are many different ways of drafting a prenuptial agreement; there is no ‘one size fits all’.

It should be tailor made to your specific circumstances. It may contain financial provision for your spouse, or it may not, depending on the assets in question. It can provide for a clean break, with a one-off lump sum payment, or it can leave open the possibility of spousal maintenance.

So long as the financial needs of both parties are met, you can say whatever you want in the agreement (within reason).

5. The agreement can be limited to dealing with only certain assets

A nuptial agreement doesn’t have to prescribe in detail exactly what the financial settlement may be on divorce. It can be limited to dealing with only certain assets.

For example, where there are important collections such as artworks, wine, watches etc., the agreement can be limited to simply ensuring that those assets are not shared.

An agreement can also cover ownership of intellectual property, for example, literary and artistic works, such as royalties.

The existence of heirlooms and wanting to ensure those are returned to the original family can be the main and only issue dealt with in an agreement.

6. Arrangements for children are always variable

Whatever may be agreed in a nuptial agreement in connection with children is always capable of being varied, with the Court always considering what is in the best interests of the child at the time of the divorce.

This includes the provisions regarding custody, care and control, and also child maintenance. These cannot be set in stone.

7. It can deal with the family pet

The Court in Hong Kong does not treat the family pet as a sentient being. It is treated as chattel which means on divorce the pet will usually remain with the legal owner.

Including provisions regarding pets in nuptial agreements can be sensible if you want to ensure you can continue to have access to your furry friend after a divorce.

8. If the matter still proceeds to Court, financial disclosure can be limited

In the event one party seeks to resile from a nuptial agreement, the Court can deal with the matter by way of preliminary issue, where the onus is placed on that party to ‘show cause as to why the agreement should not be binding’.

In these circumstances, time and costs can be saved when the Court makes early findings regarding the agreement. Importantly, the Court can also dispense, or reduce the need for extensive financial disclosure, which would otherwise have been required if no agreement had been entered into.

9. There is no point in having an infidelity clause

Infidelity clauses (which usually provide for the spouse who has been unfaithful to pay more to the other spouse or receive less from them) are contrary to public policy in Hong Kong.

They won’t be enforced and may render the agreement more vulnerable to being set aside.

10. Prenuptial agreements are a sign of a strong relationship

The prenup conversation is not always easy, and expectations are not always the same. Entering into a prenuptial agreement means a couple has to be able to discuss financial matters and reach compromises. This is important for the future of the relationship. Being able to tackle and discuss difficult issues early on is a sign of a strong relationship.

Our thinking

  • Prosperity Prep: Equipping the Next Generation for Wealth and Business Success

    Patrick Chan

    Events

  • Charles Russell Speechlys makes first Partner promotion in Singapore and moves to One Raffles Quay

    Jeffrey Lee

    News

  • Vanessa Duff writes for Expat Living on navigating divorce with a neurodivergent child

    Vanessa Duff

    In the Press

  • James Elliott-Hughes writes for Today's Family Lawyer on the legal balance of Love Island's power couple upon separation

    James Elliott-Hughes

    In the Press

  • Asian Private Banker quotes Silvia On and Jeffrey Lee on the growth of our Asia offices

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • Molly-Mae'd to Last? Exploring the legal balance of Love Island's power couple upon separation

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Quick Reads

  • Love Don’t Cost A Thing...Or Does It?

    Emily Borrowdale

    Quick Reads

  • Sports Arbitration: Takes Center Stage in Asia-Pacific

    Patrick Chan

    Insights

  • Illegal to divorce in the Philippines - is this about to change and how does England recognise overseas divorces?

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys wins China Business Law Award for Family Wealth Management

    Silvia On

    News

  • The Lawyer quotes Simon Ridpath on our Firm's strategy looking ahead to 2028

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

  • Love is Blind UK – the legal practicalities if the couples do say “I do”

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • From Goalposts to Schedule 1 claims: Navigating witness credibility and press reporting in light of Kyle Walker's legal manoeuvres.

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Quick Reads

  • “Extreme handouts to divorced wives do nothing to help [...] Women are not all victims”. After half a century, will this be the end of the ‘meal ticket for life’?

    Matt Foster

    Insights

  • Common Law v Civil Law Approach to Disclosure in International Arbitration

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • 11K Consulting quotes Simon Green in its latest 'London Property Market Predictions' article

    Simon Green

    In the Press

  • A Refinement to meet Contemporary Demands - Key Features of the 2024 HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Game On for Hong Kong’s Sports Arbitration

    Patrick Chan

    Insights

  • Hubbis interviews Jeffrey Lee on the growth of our Singapore office

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • Bloomberg quotes Sarah Jane Boon on plans announced in the King’s speech to press ahead with the tax hike on UK private school fees

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

Back to top