• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Top 10 things you may not know about Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements

1. If done properly, the agreement will be enforced in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Court will give effect to an agreement so long as it is ‘fair’, neither party is left in a predicament of ‘real need’, and it was entered into with a full appreciation of its implications and with the benefit of independent legal advice.

2. A Hong Kong nuptial agreement is not the same as a marriage contract

In many European countries it is common to sign a marriage contract electing a matrimonial property regime shortly before the marriage which applies during the marriage, on divorce, and on death. The most common regimes are those of separate property and community property. If no election is made, a default regime will apply (usually one of community property).

Such documents are signed before a notary, without the benefit of financial disclosure or legal advice, and sometimes only a few hours before the wedding.

These contracts are not the same as nuptial agreements and are unlikely to be enforced in Hong Kong in the event of marital breakdown.

3. It’s never too late to have a nuptial agreement

Nobody wants to think about the possibility of things going wrong when planning a wedding, and unless family and friends have a prenuptial agreement, it is unlikely to be at the forefront of your mind.

If you didn’t have time, or simply did not think about having an agreement before the wedding, then you can still enter into a post-nuptial agreement, which is signed after the wedding. In fact, these agreements are often considered to be even more enforceable as it is harder to raise allegations of pressure.

If you have a foreign marriage contract or prenuptial agreement, it is essential to consider a Hong Kong post-nuptial agreement that meets the local requirements.

4. There is no ‘standard’ agreement

There are many different ways of drafting a prenuptial agreement; there is no ‘one size fits all’.

It should be tailor made to your specific circumstances. It may contain financial provision for your spouse, or it may not, depending on the assets in question. It can provide for a clean break, with a one-off lump sum payment, or it can leave open the possibility of spousal maintenance.

So long as the financial needs of both parties are met, you can say whatever you want in the agreement (within reason).

5. The agreement can be limited to dealing with only certain assets

A nuptial agreement doesn’t have to prescribe in detail exactly what the financial settlement may be on divorce. It can be limited to dealing with only certain assets.

For example, where there are important collections such as artworks, wine, watches etc., the agreement can be limited to simply ensuring that those assets are not shared.

An agreement can also cover ownership of intellectual property, for example, literary and artistic works, such as royalties.

The existence of heirlooms and wanting to ensure those are returned to the original family can be the main and only issue dealt with in an agreement.

6. Arrangements for children are always variable

Whatever may be agreed in a nuptial agreement in connection with children is always capable of being varied, with the Court always considering what is in the best interests of the child at the time of the divorce.

This includes the provisions regarding custody, care and control, and also child maintenance. These cannot be set in stone.

7. It can deal with the family pet

The Court in Hong Kong does not treat the family pet as a sentient being. It is treated as chattel which means on divorce the pet will usually remain with the legal owner.

Including provisions regarding pets in nuptial agreements can be sensible if you want to ensure you can continue to have access to your furry friend after a divorce.

8. If the matter still proceeds to Court, financial disclosure can be limited

In the event one party seeks to resile from a nuptial agreement, the Court can deal with the matter by way of preliminary issue, where the onus is placed on that party to ‘show cause as to why the agreement should not be binding’.

In these circumstances, time and costs can be saved when the Court makes early findings regarding the agreement. Importantly, the Court can also dispense, or reduce the need for extensive financial disclosure, which would otherwise have been required if no agreement had been entered into.

9. There is no point in having an infidelity clause

Infidelity clauses (which usually provide for the spouse who has been unfaithful to pay more to the other spouse or receive less from them) are contrary to public policy in Hong Kong.

They won’t be enforced and may render the agreement more vulnerable to being set aside.

10. Prenuptial agreements are a sign of a strong relationship

The prenup conversation is not always easy, and expectations are not always the same. Entering into a prenuptial agreement means a couple has to be able to discuss financial matters and reach compromises. This is important for the future of the relationship. Being able to tackle and discuss difficult issues early on is a sign of a strong relationship.

Our thinking

  • Token2049 week - what's on the horizon?

    Racheal Muldoon

    Quick Reads

  • My “15 Minutes of fame”, Eddie Redmayne and The Theory of Everything...

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • From Double Helix to the Courtroom – A Look Down The Microscope into DNA Testing in Family Law

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Insights

  • The path to paradise or the road to ruin? The Pathfinder pilot in Children Act cases

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

  • Setting Standards: The Ciarb Guideline on AI Use in Arbitration

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Global Insight quotes Shirley Fu, Tom Wong and Victoria Younghusband on trends in corporate activity in China

    Shirley Fu

    In the Press

  • PRC amends its AML Law to regulate specific non-financial institutions

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

  • The Evolution of Family Office Structures in Hong Kong: A Strategic Guide to Regulatory and Structuring Considerations. Part 2: Structuring Considerations

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • Passport to Parenthood: Navigating International Surrogacy Arrangements

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • The Evolution of Family Office Structures in Hong Kong: A Strategic Guide to Regulatory and Structuring Considerations. Part 1: Regulatory Compliance

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • Gafencu quotes Vanessa Duff on breakdowns of trust in marriage and the role of prenups

    Vanessa Duff

    In the Press

  • SIAC by the Numbers: What their 2024 Statistics Reveal

    Abdul Azeem Abdul Samad

    Quick Reads

  • Sarah Higgins, Sarah Jane Boon, Miranda Fisher and Charlotte Posnansky write for Family Law Journal on how the 2024 budget is impacting family law

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • DIFC Court – A New Vision - Insights from the BarMENA discussion with the Chief Justice of the DIFC Courts H.E. Wayne Martin

    Abdul Azeem Abdul Samad

    Quick Reads

  • Helliwell v Entwistle Live

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Quick Reads

  • Arbitrating shareholders’ disputes

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • BBC Radio 5 Live and The Telegraph interview Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

Back to top