• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Top 10 things you may not know about Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements

min read

1. If done properly, the agreement will be enforced in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Court will give effect to an agreement so long as it is ‘fair’, neither party is left in a predicament of ‘real need’, and it was entered into with a full appreciation of its implications and with the benefit of independent legal advice.

2. A Hong Kong nuptial agreement is not the same as a marriage contract

In many European countries it is common to sign a marriage contract electing a matrimonial property regime shortly before the marriage which applies during the marriage, on divorce, and on death. The most common regimes are those of separate property and community property. If no election is made, a default regime will apply (usually one of community property).

Such documents are signed before a notary, without the benefit of financial disclosure or legal advice, and sometimes only a few hours before the wedding.

These contracts are not the same as nuptial agreements and are unlikely to be enforced in Hong Kong in the event of marital breakdown.

3. It’s never too late to have a nuptial agreement

Nobody wants to think about the possibility of things going wrong when planning a wedding, and unless family and friends have a prenuptial agreement, it is unlikely to be at the forefront of your mind.

If you didn’t have time, or simply did not think about having an agreement before the wedding, then you can still enter into a post-nuptial agreement, which is signed after the wedding. In fact, these agreements are often considered to be even more enforceable as it is harder to raise allegations of pressure.

If you have a foreign marriage contract or prenuptial agreement, it is essential to consider a Hong Kong post-nuptial agreement that meets the local requirements.

4. There is no ‘standard’ agreement

There are many different ways of drafting a prenuptial agreement; there is no ‘one size fits all’.

It should be tailor made to your specific circumstances. It may contain financial provision for your spouse, or it may not, depending on the assets in question. It can provide for a clean break, with a one-off lump sum payment, or it can leave open the possibility of spousal maintenance.

So long as the financial needs of both parties are met, you can say whatever you want in the agreement (within reason).

5. The agreement can be limited to dealing with only certain assets

A nuptial agreement doesn’t have to prescribe in detail exactly what the financial settlement may be on divorce. It can be limited to dealing with only certain assets.

For example, where there are important collections such as artworks, wine, watches etc., the agreement can be limited to simply ensuring that those assets are not shared.

An agreement can also cover ownership of intellectual property, for example, literary and artistic works, such as royalties.

The existence of heirlooms and wanting to ensure those are returned to the original family can be the main and only issue dealt with in an agreement.

6. Arrangements for children are always variable

Whatever may be agreed in a nuptial agreement in connection with children is always capable of being varied, with the Court always considering what is in the best interests of the child at the time of the divorce.

This includes the provisions regarding custody, care and control, and also child maintenance. These cannot be set in stone.

7. It can deal with the family pet

The Court in Hong Kong does not treat the family pet as a sentient being. It is treated as chattel which means on divorce the pet will usually remain with the legal owner.

Including provisions regarding pets in nuptial agreements can be sensible if you want to ensure you can continue to have access to your furry friend after a divorce.

8. If the matter still proceeds to Court, financial disclosure can be limited

In the event one party seeks to resile from a nuptial agreement, the Court can deal with the matter by way of preliminary issue, where the onus is placed on that party to ‘show cause as to why the agreement should not be binding’.

In these circumstances, time and costs can be saved when the Court makes early findings regarding the agreement. Importantly, the Court can also dispense, or reduce the need for extensive financial disclosure, which would otherwise have been required if no agreement had been entered into.

9. There is no point in having an infidelity clause

Infidelity clauses (which usually provide for the spouse who has been unfaithful to pay more to the other spouse or receive less from them) are contrary to public policy in Hong Kong.

They won’t be enforced and may render the agreement more vulnerable to being set aside.

10. Prenuptial agreements are a sign of a strong relationship

The prenup conversation is not always easy, and expectations are not always the same. Entering into a prenuptial agreement means a couple has to be able to discuss financial matters and reach compromises. This is important for the future of the relationship. Being able to tackle and discuss difficult issues early on is a sign of a strong relationship.

Our thinking

  • eprivateclient features an article by Matt Foster and Sarah Moore on untangling crypto assets in divorce

    Matt Foster

    In the Press

    min read
  • Simon Green comments in Asian Legal Business on the attractiveness of Asia as a global capital hub amidst geopolitical uncertainty

    Simon Green

    In the Press

    min read
  • Corporate restructuring: Preparing for Future Challenges

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

    min read
  • The 1975 Act 50 Years On: Looking Back and Looking Forward

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

    min read
  • What assets can a Family Investment Company (FIC) hold?

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • LCIA Announces Consultation on Revising Arbitration Rules

    Gareth Mills

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Today's Family Lawyer quotes James Riby on an ‘extraordinary’ Court of Appeal case that highlights the importance of disclosure

    James Riby

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys wins ‘Family Law Legal Team of the Year’ at WealthBriefing European Awards 2026

    Shona Alexander

    News

    min read
  • Miranda Fisher comments in the Financial Times on child custody arrangements and the impact of geopolitics

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

    min read
  • Bad Romance: conduct and prenups

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Talon Asset Management Limited on the creation of entertainment industry-focused fund

    Gaven Cheong

    News

    min read
  • Gaven Cheong quoted in CNBC on Hong Kong’s appeal to family offices amid geopolitical uncertainty

    Gaven Cheong

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi comments in We Wealth on adoption in special cases and the change of a child’s surname

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Family Offices Across Generations: Purpose, Trends, and Key Considerations

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Hong Kong: A Strategic Base for Fund Managers Amid Regional Instability

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

    min read
  • Child Maintenance and Sport: A Game of Two Halves

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top