• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Hong Kong’s top court makes declaration in favour of same-sex partnerships

In a landmark Judgment by the Court of Final Appeal, there has been a ruling in favour of same-sex partnerships which requires the government to establish a framework for legal recognition of same-sex partnerships, such as civil partnerships. Despite being a very positive step for LGBTQ rights in Hong Kong, the court did not go as far as endorsing full marriage rights for same-sex couples.

The Appellant sought a declaration from the court, which is also commonly known as a declaratory judgment or declaratory relief, which is a form of relief generally sought by individuals from the court to clarify their rights.

The Appellant, a Hong Kong resident, was in a same-sex relationship with his partner in Hong Kong. They were married in the US in 2013. Under Hong Kong law, there is no provision allowing for same-sex marriages, nor for same-sex marriages entered into abroad to be recognised. The Appellant brought judicial review proceedings against the fact that his marriage was not recognised in Hong Kong and argued that this constituted discrimination and a violation of his constitutional rights to equality and to protection against interference with his right to privacy and family. He sought a declaration on whether:

  • he has a constitutional right to same-sex marriage under Article 25 of the Basic Law and Article 22 of Hong Kong Bill of Rights;
  • alternatively, the absence of any alternative means of legal recognition of same-sex partnerships constitutes a violation of Article 14 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights (on privacy) and/or Article 25 of the Basic Law and Article 22 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights (on equality); and
  • the non-recognition of foreign same-sex marriage constitutes a violation of Article 25 of the Basic Law and Article 22 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights.

The application was initially dismissed by the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal and then went to the Court of Final Appeal, who unanimously dismissed the first and third points above, but allowed the second on a 3-2 majority ruling.

The Court made a declaration which stated that the government is in violation of its positive obligation under Article 14 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights to establish an alternative framework for legal recognition of same-sex partnerships (such as civil partnerships) and that the government must provide for appropriate rights to ensure compliance with this obligation.

If the government do not comply, the Appellant will be entitled to return to Court to seek damages, or to seek an order to enforce the rights set out in the Court of Final Appeal’s declaration. In the event of such proceedings, the government will not be able to successfully defend its stance. Additionally, should the government fail to comply with the declaration, they would actively be in breach of the law, meaning other affected individuals may also seek to claim compensatory relief.

It is important to note that the case is not yet completely resolved as both parties have an opportunity to lodge further written submissions by 26 September 2023, upon which a final order will be made by the court. As the Judgment currently stands, once this final order has been made, the government will have two years to comply with the declaration. The final order is able to modify the declaration meaning the Court could either backtrack or confirm its decision to compel the government to make the changes.

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys successfully advises the Joint Liquidators of LB GP No.1 Ltd in Lehman Brothers litigation before the High Court in London

    Daniel Moore

    News

  • International Relocation: The Parent Trap 25 years on ...

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • FT Wealth quotes Sarah Anticoni and Vanessa Duff on prenups to protect family wealth

    Sarah Anticoni

    In the Press

  • Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments between Mainland China and Hong Kong

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Top Tips to Building your Brand - Women in Chancery

    Katelyn Silver

    Quick Reads

  • AGBI quotes Paula Boast on Saudi Arabia’s new civil code

    Paula Boast MBE

    In the Press

  • The new Building Safety Regulator’s approach to enforcement

    Charlotte Healy

    Insights

  • Property118 schemes for landlords – a mistake worth fixing?

    Hugh Gunson

    Insights

  • Confidentiality in Arbitration - A Cloak with Holes

    John Olatunji

    Insights

  • The impact of disputes concerning ultimate entitlement on interim maintenance applications and legal services orders

    Sophia Leeder

    Insights

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Bahrain

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • Copyright and AI: Part 2 – Infringement by machine?

    Nick White

    Insights

  • Is the tide turning on environmental regulation? Assessing the future impact of the OEP

    Rachel Warren

    Insights

  • Greenwashing: the story so far

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees should a Labour government add VAT to fees

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Quick Reads

  • Solicitors Journal quotes Hugh Gunson on a £1.4bn tax fraud case in the Supreme Court

    Hugh Gunson

    In the Press

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: United Arab Emirates - DIFC

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • Lexology In-Depth: Technology Disputes Edition 3 - Bahrain

    Gareth Mills

    Insights

  • Tech Monitor quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA restricting Meta from using certain customer data

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Labour government - potential change to cohabitation laws?

    Sarah Anticoni

    Quick Reads

  • Arbitration is Cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • The rise in ESG reporting requirements for UK directors and of related shareholder activism

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • South China Morning Post quotes Lisa Wong on a high-profile ruling in Hong Kong relating to RIVF

    Lisa Wong

    In the Press

  • Nigeria's challenge to US$11 billion award succeeds in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales

    John Olatunji

    Quick Reads

  • Caring across borders: The UK’s Homes for Ukraine scheme and the global nature of parental responsibility

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Quick Reads

  • International Arbitration 2023: Practical cross-border insights into international arbitration work in the UAE

    Thanos Karvelis

    Insights

  • An important reminder for employers on World Menopause Day

    Isobel Goodman

    Quick Reads

  • Game of Homes: Transatlantic Disputes

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • UAE Polishes Federal Arbitration Law

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • What next for HS2?

    Richard Flenley

    Quick Reads

  • Mediation as a pillar of dispute resolution: it’s happening, embrace it

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

    Rory Partridge

    Quick Reads

  • Back to School: How should recently separated parents face the new term?

    David Hansford

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Inside Britney and Sam’s $10m prenup

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • Mind your Language !

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • NSPCC urges Government to protect children from domestic abuse during holidays

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

Back to top