The Tech Entrepreneur’s Journey – The Capital Requirements
This article, as part of a wider series of articles, will consider the key legal aspects associated with a tech entrepreneur effectively and efficiently funding the capital requirements of his/her new business venture during its corporate life cycle.
There are alternative mechanisms available to entrepreneurs (e.g. venture debt, grants etc.) but we will be considering the most common methods we see used to raise working capital for the proposed new business during its corporate life cycle.
The seed stage of a new business is the development of an idea/concept into a trading business. In order to do this every entrepreneur will require an injection of working capital.
Once an entrepreneur has settled upon his/her business idea/concept and prior to founding the actual legal business entity he/she will need to:
- decide upon a business ownership structure (including what skill sets will be required to grow the business and identify people with these skills and consider whether to incentivise such people with equity in the business) (being the Founder(s));
- find appropriately skilled professional advisors (legal, tax and accounting advice will, as a minimum, be required in the early days of a start-up business); and
- create a business plan to assist with raising working capital for the business.
We believe that the primary goal for any fundraising of a technology business should be to give the Founder(s) (and his/her team) the resources and time required to create a product/service that fixes an issue they have identified in the market/solve the problems of their targeted customer base, always with the view of making a profit.
Family and Friends Investment
The most common means of obtaining initial seed capital for a start-up business is from the Founder(s)’ personal assets, friends or family members.
The capital raised from family/friends is normally obtained in exchange for an equity stake in the business.
Once raised this capital is normally used to:
- pay the initial expenses of the business (including but not limited to tax advice as to the business structure, incorporation of the relevant legal entity, drafting of any shareholders’ agreement etc.);
- finance product development and market research;
- fund salaries of staff (including the Founder(s)); and
- develop the company’s business plan.
This capital, whilst essential to initial growth of the business, traditionally has a short life span as start-up technology businesses usually require continued cash injection to fund necessary research and product development to ensure that the identified business opportunity is still viable or drive the business towards profit.
Third Party Investment
Once the financial needs of the business outgrow the financial appetite of family and friends, start-up businesses often experience difficulties trying to convince third parties to invest due to the risk profile associated with such an early stage business.
Seeking third party investment is a significant (and potentially daunting) stage in any company’s life cycle. As such, when it comes to choosing the right investor, it is important that the company understands all of the options available to it.
In all cases, the company should consider each of the following points in an effort to to encourage a constructive relationship with the desired investor:
- funding level – how much does the company need for its desired growth;
- typically investors will want an exit plan from day one – be prepared to discuss and commit to an agreed exit plan;
- the company’s market value will be established upon taking on this investment – bear this in mind when speaking to investors as the valuation of the business will need to be justifiable;
- how much time and costs will be needed for the process of securing the desired investment – don’t underestimate ;
- what value can the desired investor add beyond the financial contribution e.g. sector expertise or additional introductions to key industry contacts/companies;
- type of investment – debt or equity funding; and
- if equity, what percentage of the company’s shareholding you are willing to give up.
The traditional avenues available to a company seeking to obtain seed capital investment from third parties are:
- professional “Angel Investors” – high net worth individuals who provide capital for a business start-up, usually in exchange for equity. There are multiple Angel Investor networks in existence that allow start-up companies the opportunity to connect with these high net worth individuals;
- from a Seed Capital Fund - a fund established solely for the purpose of providing capital for a business start-up in return for a mixture of debt and equity; or
- a mixture of these two.
Any investor’s appetite to invest in a technology start-up will be determined by the founder(s)’ skills, business capabilities, track record (if any) and sector experience, together with the product’s or service’s ultimate benefit to its users. Such factors will ultimately determine how much seed capital (if any) an investor may contribute to a start-up technology business and for what equity stake.
From our experience the most common area of contention is what can be referred to as the “Dragon’s Den Dilemma”. This being a large disparity in what equity stake in the company an investor wishes to obtain for its investment and what equity stake the founder(s)’ is/are willing to give up for this level of investment.
The ultimate structure of any proposed investment is usually heavily influenced by tax. A company may be able to incentivise investors with potential tax reliefs that are available to companies e.g. Investors’ Relief that enables qualifying investors to pay tax on up to £10 million of gains realised on ordinary shares issued to the investor after a 3 year holding period at half the usual tax rate (i.e. 10% instead of 20%), EIS (Enterprise Investment Scheme) and SEIS (Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme) both of which, subject to differing financial limits and conditions, enable qualifying UK based investors after a 3 year holding period to pay 0% tax on gains realised on its investment of ordinary shares in the capital of the company.
When a start-up requires urgent funding but has not yet settled on its fundraising valuation it is becoming more prevalent for investments to be made pursuant to the terms of an “Advance Subscription Agreement”. The reason for this is that any capital advanced by an SEIS/EIS investor must be used as subscription for shares in the company (as opposed to, for example, being a loan to the company). This is a relatively new concept that allows a start-up to receive an immediate capital injection whilst retaining the investor’s opportunity to obtain EIS or SEIS tax relief. As this is a relatively new concept, it remains subject to HMRC scrutiny but at the date of publication of this article it seems to be appealing to both start-ups and investors.
We would expect such investment (subject to the size of investment being deemed low in value to the investor) to be made pursuant to “Series Seed Investment Documents”. Such documentation tends to be less extensive than “Series A Investment Documents (these documents being used for the first venture capital investment made into the company) and will normally impose fewer restrictions on the company and how the business is managed than would be expected in Series A Investment Documents.
The Founder(s) should expect to provide a seed investor with a number of investment protections including but not limited to:
- simple, non-participating liquidation event preferences (i.e. the investor gets its investment reimbursed to it prior to any other capital being split between the shareholders of the company);
- basic warranties;
- non compete provisions;
- participation rights in the event of a sale of the business or company;
- pre-emption rights on an issuance of shares by the company (a right for the investor to be able to subscribe for shares in preference to any other third parties);
- rights to receive key information related to the company e.g. accounts and management accounts, annual business plan etc.,
but should, at this stage, expect to retain ultimate control of the company (including the board) and, subject to basic investor veto rights, the day to day operations of the business.
Whilst this article provides a high level overview of the Seed Capital stage of a business’ corporate life cycle, it is only the initial stage. Set out below is an overview of a typical business corporate life cycle. We will comment on each of these stages in our the future articles of The Tech Entrepreneur’s Journey – The Capital Requirements.
For more information please contact Ashwin Pillay on +44 (0)20 7438 2194 or at Ashwin.Pillay@crsblaw.com.
China’s Personal Information Protection Law – keeping up with the Joneses or increased cyber-security?
Up until recently, China’s data protection rules could be found through a number of laws and guidelines
Construction & Infrastructure Seminar
Experts will give insights and analysis on Building & Fire Safety, Case law updates and global supply shortages.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises shareholders of eCommonSense on sale to ECI Software Solutions
eCommonSense is a technology solutions provider focused on the construction and building materials supply sectors.
Resilience vs. Recovery - How the Facebook outage highlights important lessons
The recent Facebook outage disrupted all of its key global platforms, including Instagram and WhatsApp.
Examining the draft RPDT legislation
Helen Coward considers the important aspects of the draft legislation for the new residential property developer tax.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Silbury Finance on a £55m facility to a Jersey unit trust
Silbury provides real estate development finance for professional developers seeking to acquire and build in the UK.
Who will carry the risk? Professional indemnity crisis in construction
The UK government announced details of its ban on the use of combustible materials on high rise buildings.
Charles Russell Speechlys acts for Cmostores Group Limited on its acquisition of JTM Plumbing Limited
CMO Group Plc, UK’s largest pureplay online retailer of building materials which recently listed on AIM.
The role of IFCs in the post-Brexit environment
International Financial Centres (“IFCs”), are now on a level playing field with the UK when approaching the EU market.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises the founders of Compandben on the sale of the business to TopSource Worldwide
Compandben is one of the longest established international providers of employment solutions.
Construction Update on Building Safety and the Golden Thread
Find out about the construction update on Building Safety and the Golden Thread.
Residential property developer tax: Draft legislation published and technical consultation launched
While a number of important issues have been addressed in the legislation, there is still a lot outstanding.
Strategic Planning for Modern Landed Estates
The second in our series of articles on succession planning for landed estates covering a wide variety of matters.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Stop, collaborate and listen: Top 10 Tips with Collaboration Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips on collaboration agreements - what should you know?
Fiona Edmond and Mark Smith write for Property Week on data centres as an infrastructure asset class
The complexity of operational issues is something those new to the sector may not anticipate and interest is likely to increase.
Gareth Mills writes for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on technology disputes in Bahrain
The most common disputes occur following perceived or actual failures to deliver required technology services an lack of clarity.
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
eCommerce and the Post-Brexit State of Play
Key UK and EU legislation governing how online platforms deal with consumers and their business users.