The Saturday 3pm football blackout: does it have a future?
Football fans across the country generally know the score: if your team has a 3pm Saturday kick-off, the only way to watch the match live legally will be to buy a ticket and head through the turnstiles. However, on Saturday 8 September 2018 supporters in England tuned in to live coverage of that day’s fixtures on the English Football League’s (EFL) iFollow streaming platform (and other club-managed platforms).
This was possible because a “blackout” imposed by the FA on the broadcasting of football between 2.45pm and 5.15pm on a Saturday does not apply during international breaks when other football is being broadcast during the blackout period. Andy Holt, chairman of Accrington Stanley who currently play in EFL League One, tweeted that “[the decision to broadcast Saturday 3pm kick-offs] kills our income and destroys atmosphere.”
This article will consider the legal basis for the Saturday 3pm blackout and whether it has a future in the current football landscape.
Article 48 of the UEFA Statutes grant UEFA and Member Associations (“MA”) exclusive broadcast rights to matches which come within their jurisdiction. Article 3 of the Implementing Regulations to Article 48 allows each MA to designate two and a half hours on weekends to prohibit the transmission by any means of any football in the territory of the MA.
The MA decisions regarding blocked hours for the 2018-19 season are published here.
Article 2 of the Implementing Regulations states that allowing transmission-free periods is designed to ensure that spectators are not deterred from attending football matches or participating in matches themselves on account of broadcast matches.
International break exception
Article 4 of the Implementing Regulations states that if the MA decides to transmit a match during blocked hours, it must also accept the transmission of any other match in its territory during the same period. International matches are widely scheduled during the 2.45pm – 5.15pm period on a Saturday. As soon as a match is permitted to be transmitted in England, all matches can be transmitted; therefore, the blocking period is not sustainable during international weekends and the FA excludes these weekends from the blackout.
What future for the blackout in the current landscape?
The UEFA blackout Regulations were first introduced in the 1980s, at a time when the whole English Football League’s TV rights were valued at approximately £12million a season. So are they still sustainable in a current landscape where the Premier League TV rights alone are valued at around £1.3 billion a season?
Ofcom carried out consumer research in 2016 which suggested that fans strongly valued the Saturday 3pm kick-off slot to attend matches live. Furthermore, advocates for lower league clubs are more likely to oppose removing the blackout by reiterating that they rely on matchday income to a much larger extent than elite clubs (for whom TV revenue has far surpassed gate receipts as an income source).
However, the views of fans and chairmen may be side-lined if the European Commission becomes involved in the dispute. In 2001 the Commission found that a weekly restriction of two and a half hours had no appreciable effect on competition and so did not infringe Article 101(1) TFEU. It is possible that in the current climate this would not still be considered the case. The blackout has a two-way effect across Europe. First, following the Murphy case¹, the blackout is implemented in a way which effectively means that even on the continent Premier League matches cannot be shown in English and only one 3pm kick-off can be shown by a licensee. In 2014 Virgin Media, in a complaint to Ofcom, argued for all 380 Premier League matches to be shown live so as to stop what they saw as the artificially high price of obtaining the rights. Secondly, even continental football is prohibited during the blackout period; as a result, fans of Cristiano Ronaldo missed the first 15 minutes of his Juventus debut as the game kicked off at 5pm UK time. Eleven Sports, who have UK rights to Serie A, have stated their intention to challenge the blackout.
If an appreciable effect on competition were shown, the Commission would consider if the blackout rule is inherent or proportionate to a legitimate objective. This would be an interesting balancing act. For example on one hand, AG Kokott noted in a 2011 Opinion that “it has not been adequately shown…that the closed periods actually encourage attendance at and participation in matches”, and a report published by the EU in 2014 stated that the blackout “sits at odds with the European Commission’s aspirations to promote cross-border access to audiovisual content”. On the other hand, perhaps furthering the legitimate objective of increasing sports participation and the health benefits which result would be favoured by the Commission.
If the European Commission takes a close look in the current climate of sports viewing habits, its decision will have a significant effect on football fans, clubs, and media stakeholders when the 3pm kickoffs come around.
¹Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure and Karen Murphy v. Media Protection Services Limited (2011) - C-403/08 and C-429/08
For more information please contact Jonathan Hyman on +44 (0)20 7438 2201 or at Jonathan.Hyman@crsblaw.com.
The Future of Property Careers
Join to our panel discussion and Q&A with industry leaders on the range of opportunities within the property and construction sector.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Music to our ears? Well, perhaps not for Apple.
A feud first began when the music streaming giant, Spotify, filed a complaint against music streaming provide rand competitor, Apple Inc.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Charles Russell Speechlys boosts private wealth offering with the hire of an international tax team
Robert Reymond will be joined at the firm by Leigh Nicoll, Emma Tyrrell and Oliver Cooper.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.
Competition and Markets Authority announces review of the EU vertical agreements block exemption
The UK Competition and Markets Authority is reviewing the future application of the EU vertical agreements block exemption in the UK.
Playing Copycat – Why have M&S begun legal action against Aldi over Colin the Caterpillar?
M&S’s chocolate caterpillar was the first of its kind to land on our supermarket shelves, over 30 years ago.
Building Back Better: Future Gazing
What’s next for the hospitality industry post-pandemic?
Building Back Better: Re-examining your proposition
Why hospitality businesses should re-examine their proposition now