The Saturday 3pm football blackout: does it have a future?
Football fans across the country generally know the score: if your team has a 3pm Saturday kick-off, the only way to watch the match live legally will be to buy a ticket and head through the turnstiles. However, on Saturday 8 September 2018 supporters in England tuned in to live coverage of that day’s fixtures on the English Football League’s (EFL) iFollow streaming platform (and other club-managed platforms).
This was possible because a “blackout” imposed by the FA on the broadcasting of football between 2.45pm and 5.15pm on a Saturday does not apply during international breaks when other football is being broadcast during the blackout period. Andy Holt, chairman of Accrington Stanley who currently play in EFL League One, tweeted that “[the decision to broadcast Saturday 3pm kick-offs] kills our income and destroys atmosphere.”
This article will consider the legal basis for the Saturday 3pm blackout and whether it has a future in the current football landscape.
Article 48 of the UEFA Statutes grant UEFA and Member Associations (“MA”) exclusive broadcast rights to matches which come within their jurisdiction. Article 3 of the Implementing Regulations to Article 48 allows each MA to designate two and a half hours on weekends to prohibit the transmission by any means of any football in the territory of the MA.
The MA decisions regarding blocked hours for the 2018-19 season are published here.
Article 2 of the Implementing Regulations states that allowing transmission-free periods is designed to ensure that spectators are not deterred from attending football matches or participating in matches themselves on account of broadcast matches.
International break exception
Article 4 of the Implementing Regulations states that if the MA decides to transmit a match during blocked hours, it must also accept the transmission of any other match in its territory during the same period. International matches are widely scheduled during the 2.45pm – 5.15pm period on a Saturday. As soon as a match is permitted to be transmitted in England, all matches can be transmitted; therefore, the blocking period is not sustainable during international weekends and the FA excludes these weekends from the blackout.
What future for the blackout in the current landscape?
The UEFA blackout Regulations were first introduced in the 1980s, at a time when the whole English Football League’s TV rights were valued at approximately £12million a season. So are they still sustainable in a current landscape where the Premier League TV rights alone are valued at around £1.3 billion a season?
Ofcom carried out consumer research in 2016 which suggested that fans strongly valued the Saturday 3pm kick-off slot to attend matches live. Furthermore, advocates for lower league clubs are more likely to oppose removing the blackout by reiterating that they rely on matchday income to a much larger extent than elite clubs (for whom TV revenue has far surpassed gate receipts as an income source).
However, the views of fans and chairmen may be side-lined if the European Commission becomes involved in the dispute. In 2001 the Commission found that a weekly restriction of two and a half hours had no appreciable effect on competition and so did not infringe Article 101(1) TFEU. It is possible that in the current climate this would not still be considered the case. The blackout has a two-way effect across Europe. First, following the Murphy case¹, the blackout is implemented in a way which effectively means that even on the continent Premier League matches cannot be shown in English and only one 3pm kick-off can be shown by a licensee. In 2014 Virgin Media, in a complaint to Ofcom, argued for all 380 Premier League matches to be shown live so as to stop what they saw as the artificially high price of obtaining the rights. Secondly, even continental football is prohibited during the blackout period; as a result, fans of Cristiano Ronaldo missed the first 15 minutes of his Juventus debut as the game kicked off at 5pm UK time. Eleven Sports, who have UK rights to Serie A, have stated their intention to challenge the blackout.
If an appreciable effect on competition were shown, the Commission would consider if the blackout rule is inherent or proportionate to a legitimate objective. This would be an interesting balancing act. For example on one hand, AG Kokott noted in a 2011 Opinion that “it has not been adequately shown…that the closed periods actually encourage attendance at and participation in matches”, and a report published by the EU in 2014 stated that the blackout “sits at odds with the European Commission’s aspirations to promote cross-border access to audiovisual content”. On the other hand, perhaps furthering the legitimate objective of increasing sports participation and the health benefits which result would be favoured by the Commission.
If the European Commission takes a close look in the current climate of sports viewing habits, its decision will have a significant effect on football fans, clubs, and media stakeholders when the 3pm kickoffs come around.
¹Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure and Karen Murphy v. Media Protection Services Limited (2011) - C-403/08 and C-429/08
For more information please contact Jonathan Hyman on +44 (0)20 7438 2201 or at Jonathan.Hyman@crsblaw.com.
Marcus Stuttard will provide his unique insight and a "state of the nation" market update.
Dismissal for refusing vaccination found to be fair
An employment tribunal found that the summary dismissal of a care assistant who refused to be vaccinated, was fair.
UK Construction Law Update: What Happened in 2021? What can we expect in 2022?
The panel will cover a number of key construction law topics to ensure you stay in the loop
Online safety – 2022 begins with regulatory developments in both the UK and the EU
Last week saw developments within the UK and EU in their attempts to ensure online businesses do more to address illegal online content.
Why “Divorce Day” may come 3 months late in 2022
Fraudulent misrepresentation and the awareness condition: will the Court of Appeal bring certainty?
Is the claimant proving that they relied on false representations?
To flex or not to flex: comparing traditional offices with flexible office space
Is Buy Now, Pay Later creating a new debt crisis?
BNPL providers are quick to claim that their services are offered with “no interest and no fees”, but is this really the case?
Restrictive Covenants Declaration that a restrictive covenant is no longer enforceable
Emma Preece explores restrictive covenants.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Topland Group on two key transactions
Topland Group is one of the largest multi-billion pound, privately owned investment groups.
A Little Help from My Friends? New Measures on Assistance in the Collection of UK Taxes in Guernsey and the Isle of Man
An important development for individual taxpayers, trust companies and other professional services providers.
Property Patter: What can the property world expect from Parliament and the courts in 2022
What’s ahead in the world of property law during 2022
Environmental Land Management: Whose carbon is it anyway?
Everything you need to know about Environmental Land Management Schemes.
Top 10 Tips for dealing with Easements
Everything you need to know about dealing with Easements.
The changing leasehold landscape: Government consultation on reforming the leasehold and commonhold systems in England and Wales
Lauren Fraser and Laura Bushaway explore the changes occurring in the leasehold landscape process.
Social Tokens: What are the regulatory challenges in the UK?
Social tokens are one of the latest innovations in the crypto space and have grown significantly in recent years.
PRA to further scrutinise cloud computing in 2022
Philanthropy Insights – A discussion with John Pepin and Rennie Hoare of Philanthropy Impact
Join us as we discuss the current landscape of philanthropy in the UK and current trends, priorities and concerns amongst philanthropists.
The green lease: back for good?
Emma Humphreys and Phil Webb look at the growing interest in green lease clauses.
Expert Shopping – Seeking to rely on a new expert
A practice known as expert shopping may see the court order the disclosure of the previous experts.