England’s love of football continues as an English Crown Court scores a conviction
Football fans across the UK were able to watch all 2018 FIFA World Cup games through traditional broadcasters, such as ITV. Gareth Southgate’s England team exceeded expectations by reaching the World Cup semi-finals and the excitement and World Cup fever that consumed the nation as Harry Kane scored the winning goal in injury time against Tunisia and Eric Dier scored England’s winning penalty against Colombia, lead to record TV ratings being set.
England’s semi-final against Croatia was also broadcast by ITV and continued to shatter TV rating records. ITV had an audience share of 84%, and the peak audience was 26.6 million viewers with an average audience of 24.3 million tuning in between kick-off and the final whistle. This was the highest average audience for a single football match ever. The match also had 4.3 million simulcast requests on ITV Hub – a new record, the Hub’s biggest ever number for live programming.
However, many football fans outside of the UK searched online for websites hosting illegal free feeds in attempts to bypass paywalls blocking them from watching World Cup fixtures.
This has been an issue reported on regularly recently as content owners, rights holders and platform owners are devoting significant resources and continue to work together to take down illegal streams in real-time as sport inevitably attracts a lot of global attention from pirates, despite offenders facing criminal penalties.
A recent breakthrough in the battle against illegal streaming saw a man who ran an operation providing illegal access to English Premier League football matches jailed for five years and three months in July 2018, as part of a Premier League piracy case.
It was estimated that almost 8,000 XBMC (Kodi) based devices loaded with a subscription IPTV service were said to have been sold and it was discovered that the offender also created and sold access to his own illegal streaming service – infusum.tv.
The piracy operation ran from March 2013 to July 2015, during which time over £750,000 was generated from the sale of set-top boxes, carried out from a shop and online marketplaces such as eBay and Amazon. The court heard that broadcasters and the Premier League faced potential losses of £4 million per year, while using the devices in pubs exposed licensees to the risk of prosecution.
The High Court also recently granted injunctions to block access during the 2018-2019 football season to certain websites which had previously provided infringing live streams of Premier League and UEFA match footage to UK consumers.
The Premier League's application sought an order for an injunction following the expiry of an injunction that covered the season running from August 2017 to May 2018. The Judge, Mr Justice Arnold, considered that the evidence filed in support of the Premier League’s application showed that the order covering the 2017/18 season had been very effective in achieving the blocking of the infringing servers during matches, and there was no evidence that over-blocking had occurred.
Mr Justice Arnold granted a further injunction for the 2018-2019 season, with new terms enlarging the scope of the targeted servers and permitting the Premier League to wait a short while before notifying the hosting UK internet service providers (ISPs).
UEFA followed in the footsteps of the Premier League and sought variations from the previous football stream blocking injunction granted to it under copyright rules as it wanted to cover additional UEFA competitions, target more servers and make the notification of hosting ISPs subject to a short delay. Mr Justice Arnold also granted the order as sought by UEFA.
As a result, the concept of blocking injunctions therefore appears to be becoming the norm in the battle against the illegal streaming of live sporting events, with football leading the way, and imposing criminal penalties in addition to the conviction of offenders is intended to deter others from infringing the rights of content owners, rights holders and platform owners in the future.
- The Football Association Premier League Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc and others  EWHC 1828 (Ch), 18 July 2018
- Union Des Associations Europeennes De Football v British Telecommunications Plc and others  EWHC 1900 (Ch), 24 July 2018
China’s Personal Information Protection Law – keeping up with the Joneses or increased cyber-security?
Up until recently, China’s data protection rules could be found through a number of laws and guidelines
ESG in Sport – net zero targets and “coolerplate” clauses
Charles Russell Speechlys advises shareholders of eCommonSense on sale to ECI Software Solutions
eCommonSense is a technology solutions provider focused on the construction and building materials supply sectors.
Resilience vs. Recovery - How the Facebook outage highlights important lessons
The recent Facebook outage disrupted all of its key global platforms, including Instagram and WhatsApp.
Property Patter: Dealing with Sporting Rights over Land
Sporting rights can cause issues particularly if they are granted over land which may be developed in the future.
The United Arab Emirates Joins the Madrid System
Charles Russell Speechlys advises the founders of Compandben on the sale of the business to TopSource Worldwide
Compandben is one of the longest established international providers of employment solutions.
Emma Raducanu - "Serving to Unite the Nation" - The Future Protection of Sporting Events of National Interest
Supply chain going flat
"The WinnerS Take It All"
In a sports setting, it is most unusual to see so many winners arising out of a decision by a rights holder to share rights.
2020: Influencer, 2021: Creative Director – what could go wrong?
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
Jason Saiban writes for Food Manufacture on the food industry's climate change challenge
The key challenge will be how the environmental targets are actually met.
Keep Your Enemies Close – Multi-Club Ownership in UEFA Competition
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
Nick White writes for City AM on how City Football Group's multiple ownership model might give Man City an edge in the transfer market post-Brexit
Could a multiple ownership model give clubs an edge in the transfer market post-Brexit?
Nick White writes for Intellectual Property Magazine on the ever-expanding role of licensed content within the video gaming industry
Darren Bailey quoted by City AM on why a salary cap is unlikely to succeed where Financial Fair Play failed in making European football more competitive
The solution to football’s problems may require more fundamental change.
Mark Hill writes for In-House Community Magazine on solutions templating, a new priority for in-house legal teams
Removing the burden from legal teams, contract managers and administrators.
Richard Davies quoted by eprivateclient on tattoos and their licensing for high profile private clients
Private clients and advisers have many things to think about but one thing that’s unlikely to make the list is tattoos.