Housing-with-care considered in first ever parliamentary debate
The first ever formal parliamentary debate into housing-with-care was held on 1 July 2021, tabled by Jim Shannon MP. The debate focussed on the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on retirement communities, flagging the threat of serious illness, loss of social support and isolation to the elder community but also highlighting that retirement villages tended to be safer environments by offering residents the ability to self-isolate in their own homes whilst maintaining access to a network of support, supervision and social interaction which was not possible in other care settings.
The UK retirement village space is still a nascent market compared to other countries (only 0.6% of over-65s in the UK live in such facilities whereas in the US, New Zealand and Australia this figure is closer to 5% to 6%), but it has been rapidly growing in recent years driven by an increase in life expectancy and a shortage of suitable retirement accommodation.
The debate outlined three things needed to address this shortage of suitable retirement accommodation – (1) sector-specific legislation and regulation to set out residents’ rights and to define the nature of the relationship with care providers, so as to give greater long-term confidence to both consumers and investors; (2) clarity in the planning system as it is currently harder to build housing-with-care properties than traditional care homes due to a lack of definition in the planning system; and (3) funding options for affordable housing-with-care provision so that it is an option for all older people.
Jim Shannon MP said that the pandemic has redrawn the landscape for retirement communities and that the Government must take steps to fund later living accommodation to plan and prepare for the future. This does not mean that there are calls to move away entirely from traditional models of care homes or retirement living. As the Rt Hon Karen Bradley MP stressed, there has to be a full suite of facilities available so that the right facility is available for the right person. It is about having the right housing options available for retired people to stay independent for longer, continuing to live as part of a wider community in their own home, with the care they need easily accessible when needed.
The debate has marked a key milestone in the evolvement of this sector. The overarching theme from the debate is that there is a real opportunity for the retirement village model to form part of the Government’s plans to reform the social care system and address the housing crisis. There are mounting calls for a cross-Government taskforce to be established to look at this type of facility and for the Government to set out a clear roadmap for how it plans to support this sector during its expansion.
Charles Russell Speechlys has considerable expertise in the retirement living sector. If you would like more information, please contact Jon Bond (Banking), Cara Fulker (Banking), Sarah Wigington (Corporate), Claire Fallows (Planning) or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys’ contact.
Increased cost and shortage of materials – what impact does this have on negotiating building contracts?
Powering Real Estate
Is it plausible to meet the governments ambitious plan to get new houses off the gas grid by 2025? Watch our webinar here
Property Patter: “Holiday” listening for surveyors: what (non-COVID) news is there so far in 2021?
Here we discuss “business as usual” judgments which have been handed down so far this year.
Pandemic Clauses: sharing (risk) is not (necessarily) caring
A County Court decision has refused to include a clause in a renewal lease to reduce the rent by 50% in the event of future lockdowns
Service charge demands: a reminder of key principles
What are the key principles, implications and key takeaways?
Record success for Charles Russell Speechlys’ Private Wealth practice in Chambers HNW 2021 directory
We are delighted to have once again been recognised as a leader in our field in the Chambers High Net Worth 2021 Guide.
Finance Bill 21/22: the implications for corporate taxpayers
The Finance Bill 2021-2022 was published yesterday. What impact will this have on corporate tax payers?
Barclay v Barclay: A Stark Reminder for Badly Behaved High-Profile Litigants
David considers the Barclay v Barclay case and if the judgment should be published, given it's severe criticism of Lord Barclay's conduct
Property Patter: dealing with COVID-19 arrears and the future of commercial tenancy relationships
What are the government’s plans for dealing with pandemic arrears and commercial tenancy relationships?
Emma Preece writes for Property Week on complying with vacant possession conditions
The Court of Appeal recently grappled with the issue of vacant possession in Capitol Park Leeds Plc v Global Radio Services.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Duke Royalty on royalty financing agreement with Fairmed Healthcare AG
Duke Royalty is the leading provider of royalty finance to companies in the UK and Europe.
Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted for Best EIS/SEIS Legal/Regulatory Adviser at 2021 EISA Awards
The Awards denote excellence and recognise the achievements of EIS/SEIS practitioners over the past year.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on the sale of No.1 Lounges Ltd to SwissportALD
SwissportALD will run nine No.1 Lounge properties at the UK’s London Heathrow, London Gatwick, and Birmingham airports.
Property Patter: The Electronic Communications Code – what are the current issues with negotiating telecoms agreements?
We discuss some of the practical issues arising out of the Electronic Communications Code.
Charles Russell Speechlys releases H1 2021 deal highlights
Our deal highlights from the past 6 months are now available.
Joseph Green writes for Property Week on whether special-purpose vehicle leases can be used to avoid empty rates
A recent Supreme Court judgment clarified where the burden of paying empty rates should lie.
When does a claim "become known" under a contractual time bar clause?
Emma Preece quoted by Estate Gazette on the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision in Capitol Park Leeds v Global Radio Services
The Court of Appeal backed tenants in an unusual case about the condition in which tenants are obliged to return premises to landlords.
Q&A: Duval and consent for alterations
Q&A from a landlord and tenant on consent to carry out works in the light of the Supreme Court ruling in Duval.