Dispensation from consultation and major works
In the recently decided case of Aster Communities v Chapman & Others  EWCA Civ 660, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the First-Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (“FTT”) and confirmed that the FTT has considerable scope to impose conditions when granting dispensation from the consultation requirements of Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“1985 Act”). Landlords must follow the consultation procedure when carrying out major works, otherwise they can only recover a maximum of £250 from each tenant unless an order is obtained dispensing with them.
This is an important decision and one of relevance to both landlords and tenants dealing with the consultation requirements and applications for dispensation. In this case, the landlord of a block of flats let on long leases consulted with leaseholders under Section 20 in relation to various major works. The Notice of Intention to carry out works, however, did not refer to proposed balcony asphalt repair works. Therefore, the FTT found that the landlord had not consulted with the tenants in relation to those works. However, dispensation was granted on the following conditions by the FTT:
(1) The landlord was to pay the reasonable costs of an expert nominated by the lessees to consider and advise them on the necessity of replacing all the balcony asphalt;
(2) The landlord was to pay the lessees’ reasonable costs of the application; and
(3) The costs of the application were not recoverable by the landlord from the lessees through the service charge.
The landlord objected to the first and second conditions but the Court of Appeal upheld all of the conditions attached to the grant of dispensation. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the FTT has a wide discretion to grant dispensation to the consultation requirements on terms which they consider fit and appropriate.
The Court viewed the grant of dispensation as effectively an “indulgence” to the landlord as a result of a defect in compliance with the consultation requirements. Whether a tenant has suffered prejudice from a defect in the consultation procedure, will be dependent on whether they would have acted differently (and can show this) if the consultation requirements imposed by the 1985 Act had been fully complied with. In Aster, because one of the lessees had shown she would have commissioned an expert report on the necessity the replacement of the balcony asphalt had the consultation been carried out, that prejudice had been proved on behalf of all the tenants.
The decision follows, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Daejan Investments Ltd v. Benson  UKSC 14 and confirms that the FTT has a wide discretion to impose whatever conditions it deems appropriate to an order granting dispensation, and shows the wide range of conditions which may be imposed.
It remains important for landlords to ensure that the consultation procedure is carefully followed to avoid any need for an application for dispensation. However, applications for dispensation can also be made where works are required in an emergency and there isn’t sufficient time for a landlord to complete the consultation procedure. If dispensation is granted, the FTT will have a wide discretion to impose appropriate conditions, such as for the landlord to pay the tenants’ costs of obtaining expert evidence.
Record success for Charles Russell Speechlys’ Private Wealth practice in Chambers HNW 2021 directory
We are delighted to have once again been recognised as a leader in our field in the Chambers High Net Worth 2021 Guide.
Untangling the UK/Swiss Knot: Dealing with a cross border estate
What do the family need to think about following the death of a Swiss person with some UK connections?
Finance Bill 21/22: the implications for corporate taxpayers
The Finance Bill 2021-2022 was published yesterday. What impact will this have on corporate tax payers?
Barclay v Barclay: A Stark Reminder for Badly Behaved High-Profile Litigants
David considers the Barclay v Barclay case and if the judgment should be published, given it's severe criticism of Lord Barclay's conduct
Property Patter: dealing with COVID-19 arrears and the future of commercial tenancy relationships
What are the government’s plans for dealing with pandemic arrears and commercial tenancy relationships?
Emma Preece writes for Property Week on complying with vacant possession conditions
The Court of Appeal recently grappled with the issue of vacant possession in Capitol Park Leeds Plc v Global Radio Services.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Duke Royalty on royalty financing agreement with Fairmed Healthcare AG
Duke Royalty is the leading provider of royalty finance to companies in the UK and Europe.
Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted for Best EIS/SEIS Legal/Regulatory Adviser at 2021 EISA Awards
The Awards denote excellence and recognise the achievements of EIS/SEIS practitioners over the past year.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on the sale of No.1 Lounges Ltd to SwissportALD
SwissportALD will run nine No.1 Lounge properties at the UK’s London Heathrow, London Gatwick, and Birmingham airports.
Property Patter: The Electronic Communications Code – what are the current issues with negotiating telecoms agreements?
We discuss some of the practical issues arising out of the Electronic Communications Code.
Charles Russell Speechlys releases H1 2021 deal highlights
Our deal highlights from the past 6 months are now available.
Joseph Green writes for Property Week on whether special-purpose vehicle leases can be used to avoid empty rates
A recent Supreme Court judgment clarified where the burden of paying empty rates should lie.
Housing-with-care considered in first ever parliamentary debate
The first ever formal parliamentary debate into housing-with-care focussed on the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on retirement communities
When does a claim "become known" under a contractual time bar clause?
Emma Preece quoted by Estate Gazette on the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision in Capitol Park Leeds v Global Radio Services
The Court of Appeal backed tenants in an unusual case about the condition in which tenants are obliged to return premises to landlords.
Q&A: Duval and consent for alterations
Q&A from a landlord and tenant on consent to carry out works in the light of the Supreme Court ruling in Duval.
Property Patter: the whys and wherefores of receivership
What is a fixed charge receiver?
Force majeure and COVID-19: claims of the unexpected
John and Simon look at a force majeure claim arising out of the pandemic and the application of the Braganza duty.
Changes to Right to Work Checks from 1 July 2021
EEA citizens and their family members are required to evidence immigration status in the UK, in the same way as other foreign nationals.