Q&A examining information notices and the right to manage
Can section 82 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 be used by a leaseholder to compel a freeholder to supply contact details for other leasesholders who have not responded to a notice to participate in an RTM company and subsequent right to manage claim?
Section 82 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) enables an RTM company to serve an information notice on a third party, such as the landlord or the landlord’s managing agent, requesting information which it ‘reasonably requires for ascertaining the particulars required by or by virtue of section 80 to be included in a claim notice for claiming to acquire the right to manage the premises’ (the ‘information notice’). As such, this right is limited to information which the RTM company reasonably requires to be included in the claim notice. It extends only to information within the possession or control of the person served with the notice (CLRA 2002, s 82(1)(a)). The recipient of the information notice has 28 days to comply and provide the information requested in the information notice.
The freeholder or their managing agent will hold the contact details for all of the leaseholders in the building in order to send ground rent and/or service charge demands and other communications in relation to the management of the building.
References: CLRA 2002, s 79(8)
Pursuant to CLRA 2002, s 80, it is a requirement of the claim notice to include the full name of each person who is both: (a) the qualifying tenant of a flat and (b) a member of the RTM company, and the address of their flat. In addition, a copy of the claim notice must be sent to each qualifying tenant in the building.
Pursuant to CLRA 2002, s 79(2), a valid claim notice cannot be given unless each person required to be given a notice of invitation to participate has been served with that notice at least 14 days before service of the claim notice. Therefore, the RTM company may need to prove service of the notice of invitation to participate in relation to those qualifying tenants who have not become members of the RTM company.
However, there is no requirement to include any statement in the claim notice regarding service of the notice of invitation to participate, so there is an argument that the contact details of the leaseholders in the building are not reasonably required to enable the RTM company to ascertain the particulars to be included in the claim notice.
Further, the right under CLRA 2002, s 82 is exercisable by the RTM company rather than an individual leaseholder.
The RTM company could serve an information notice and include a request for contact details of the other leaseholders in the building but for the reasons set out above the recipient is unlikely to be under any duty to supply that information, although they may choose to do so.
As an alternative or additional step, the RTM company can search at the Land Registry in relation to the flats where the leaseholders did not respond to the notice of invitation to participate or in advance of service of the notice of invitation to participate to obtain information as to the name and address of the relevant leaseholder(s). This information may not, however, be as up to date as that held by the freeholder or the managing agents for the building.
A consideration for a landlord receiving a request under CLRA 2002, s 82 is whether it is prevented from supplying the contact details for leaseholders by Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the General Data Protection Regulation (the GDPR). For more information on the GDPR in the property context, see Q&As:
- How does the General Data Protection Regulation impact on property owners and managers?
- Are there General Data Protection Regulation issues to consider in the context of a landlord or managing agent passing information in respect of a tenant(s) to their legal advisers in respect of a proposed vacant possession strategy or providing other legal advice in connection with the enforcement of tenant covenants in a lease and a bailiff or enforcement officer for the purposes of recovering rent arrears?
In summary, CLRA 2002, s 82 cannot be used by a leaseholder to compel a freeholder to supply contact details for other leaseholders who have not responded to a notice to participate in an RTM company and subsequent right to manage claim.
For further information on the right to manage claim generally, see Practice Note: The right to manage.
This content was first published on the Lexis Nexis Ask Forum on 23 September 2020. Please note that the links in the article relate to Lexis PSL content so will only be available to subscribers of that service. For more information, please contact Laura Bushaway on +44 (0)20 7438 2261 or at email@example.com or your usual Charles Russell Speechyls contact.
Charity Training: Digital Transformation in the Charity Sector
We would be delighted if you could join us for the second session in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
Charity Training: Brand Protection
We would be delighted if you could join us for the first in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Practicalities in Cladding Claims
Insight into Issues with Cladding Claims
EWS1 Forms - the latest episode
RICS have now published their highly anticipated guidance on when EWS1 forms will be required.
Q&A: Am I insured for COVID-19?
Laura Bushaway writes for Estates Gazette on a recent claim under the “disease clause” of business interruption policy.
The Purpose Podcast: Corporate purpose
Simon Ridpath discusses corporate purpose and the rise of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in “The Purpose Podcast”
Snail farms and other slow moving business (rates mitigation schemes)
Client alert: Construction under competition law spotlight
We outline the three investigations which have either recently concluded or are ongoing together with what this means for businesses.
New permitted development right to convert unused commercial premises into homes to come into force
Looking beyond the benefitted land: confirmation that an objector’s wider property may be considered in applications to discharge/modify restrictive covenants
Read our recent case study on applicants who were prevented from developing a new house due to a restrictive covenant covering their land.
Further extension of coronavirus restrictions affecting residential properties: Where are we now?
The extension will be implemented from and including 31 March 2021 by the Coronavirus Act 2020.
Knight Frank Wealth Report: The Global Perspective on Prime Property & Investment
Knight Frank partners joined Charles Russell Speechlys for a virtual panel-led discussion on the Knight Frank Wealth Report
Case Study: One Blackfriars Limited
An informative and positive judgment for administrators selling high-value property in distressed and complex scenarios.
Keeping Up With Construction: Handover at Practical Completion - Practical Pointers
Practical tips for the handover of a successful project.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on Trident Royalties’ US$28m Placing
Trident Royalties plc is a growth-focused mining royalty and streaming company.
Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 30 June 2021
As the restrictions are extended, read what it means for you here.
Commercial rent arrears: what are the latest restrictions on landlords’ remedies this quarter day?
What you need to know for this Quarter Day.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Avation plc on £7.5m secondary placing
Headquartered in Singapore, Avation plc manages a fleet of aircraft which it leases to airlines across the world.
To Promote or not to Promote, that is the Option: Top 10 Tips with Promotion Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips with promotion agreements - what should you know?