Further changes to landlords’ remedies for recovering commercial rent arrears: An update
Two of the classic self-help remedies open to landlords for recovering commercial rent arrears have traditionally been forfeiture and Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR), but both of these have been restricted as a result of Government measures to support tenants during the coronavirus crisis. There is also a proposed ban on winding-up petitions for coronavirus-related debts, which is already being applied by the courts.
Amended CRAR Regulations
The Regulations changing the use of CRAR originally came into force on 24 April and apply to enforcement action taken under that process.
The Taking Control of Goods and Certification of Enforcement Agents (Amendment) (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 provided three key changes (although only the first is really headline grabbing):
- An increase of the threshold before CRAR can be exercised in the first place – from 7 days’ rent arrears to 90 days, for enforcement notices given between 25 April and 30 June 2020;
- An extension, in certain circumstances, to the date by which an enforcement agent must have taken control of goods if the notice of enforcement is not to lapse; and
- An extension of the 2 year enforcement certificate that enforcement agents must hold in order to act in that capacity (again, in certain circumstances).
However, there are further amendments which apply from the June quarter day (being the day on which the amendments are expected to take effect). The Taking Control of Goods and Certification of Enforcement Agents (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2020 provide:-
- The threshold before CRAR can be exercised has increased from 90 days to 189 days’ rent arrears for enforcement notices given between 24 June and 30 September 2020;
- The restrictions on taking control of goods at premises which include a dwelling-house and goods which are found on the highway (and on the premises which an enforcement agent may not enter, re-enter or remain) are extended both in their remit and time period (such that those restrictions will now not expire until 23 August 2020); and
- There is a further extension to the validity period of the enforcement certificate that enforcement agents must hold.
Proposed changes to insolvency
The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill is reaching the conclusion of its journey through Parliament. This contains temporary restrictions on statutory demands and winding up petitions, with retrospective effect.
The Government announced on 23 April that it intended to:
- ban the use of statutory demands between 1 March – 30 June 2020; and
- restrict winding-up petitions between 27 April – 30 June 2020.
The provisions of the Bill prevent the presentation of winding up petitions during the “relevant period” (27 April to 30 June but now extended to 30 September 2020) unless the creditor has reasonable grounds for believing that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the company or that the company would have become unable to pay its debts even if the coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the company. As currently drafted, the Bill provides that coronavirus has a “financial effect” on a debtor company if the debtor’s financial position worsens as a result of, or for reasons relating to, coronavirus.
The Government announced on 19 June 2020 that there will be a further amendment to the Bill to extend these restrictions on winding-up petitions until 30 September 2020 (in line with the forfeiture moratorium affecting business tenancies – see below).
It is clear that the courts already have one eye on the legislation and are making decisions with the Bill in mind. Most recently in Re A Company (Injunction to Restrain Presentation of Petition)  EWHC 1406, the High Court granted an injunction restraining the presentation of a winding-up petition against a retail company which closed its premises due to Government restrictions on the basis of the temporary measures contained within the Bill. The Court had a “high degree of confidence” that the Bill would be enacted in more or less its current form. The Bill has prompted a lot of Parliamentary debate and the final Act is awaited in the new few weeks.
Update on forfeiture moratorium
Ever since the Coronavirus Act 2020 came into force on 25 March, a moratorium has been in place preventing the forfeiture of commercial leases for unpaid rent – currently due to expire on 30 June 2020. This has now been extended to 30 September 2020 - read our article here.
This does not affect the ability of landlords to take steps as a prelude to forfeiture in connection with other breaches of covenant, e.g. subletting, disrepair etc. Section 146 Notices in respect of such breaches remain a valid approach in the enforcement armoury open to landlords. However, the practical impact of such an approach is severely limited by amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules which have extended the stay on possession proceedings until 23 August 2020 except in relation to:
- Possession claims against trespassers within the meaning of CPR 55.6;
- Applications for an interim possession order under Section III of CPR Part 55;
- The issue of possession claims by the court – claims should be issued but will then be stayed;
- Applications for case management directions which are agreed by all the parties (so that proceedings can resume effectively once the stay has expired)
The restrictions detailed in this insight have been changed and also been extended to 31 December 2020. Please refer to our latest guidance on our September 2020 Quarter Day page which can be found here.
The Future of Property Careers
Join to our panel discussion and Q&A with industry leaders on the range of opportunities within the property and construction sector.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Charles Russell Speechlys boosts private wealth offering with the hire of an international tax team
Robert Reymond will be joined at the firm by Leigh Nicoll, Emma Tyrrell and Oliver Cooper.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.
Building Back Better: Future Gazing
What’s next for the hospitality industry post-pandemic?
Building Back Better: Re-examining your proposition
Why hospitality businesses should re-examine their proposition now
Building Back Better: Real Estate and Restructuring
How and why should hospitality businesses re-structure post pandemic?
Asian Legal Business, Hubbis and eprivateclient report on the firm's expansion in Hong Kong
The firm's Hong Kong office continues to expand with the relocation of Real Estate Partner Simon Green to lead the firm’s focus in Asia.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Fudco Partnership on sale to Exponent-backed Vibrant Foods
Fudco is a family-owned business selling South Asian ethnic foods in UK and Europe.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Polar Technology on investment by BGF
Polar Technology Management Group is a holding company for engineering businesses operating at the leading edge of technology.