Commercial rent review determinations
Rent review provisions are common place in commercial business tenancies.
Whilst the rent review mechanism is governed by the specific provisions in each lease in question, it is common to find that in the absence of agreement, the reviewed rent is to be determined by an independent expert.
As is frequently the case with determinations of any kind, one party is likely to be less happy with the result than the other! This is particularly the case if the lease allows the independent expert to make an award of costs against the “unsuccessful” party.
In that event, the question sometimes posed is what can be done to challenge an independent expert’s determination?
The answer in the vast majority of cases is not very much.
There are very limited circumstances in which a Court will set aside an independent expert determination and these are essentially:
- Where the determination discloses a manifest error (and challenges are permitted in such circumstances).
- Where the determination has been made fraudulently or through collusion.
- Where the expert has departed materially from the instruction.
- Where the expert has made an error of law.
By way of example, fraud or collusion will be incredibly rare (and even in those very few cases when it is suspected, it will be very difficult to prove) and for an error to be “manifest” any error will need to be significant, plain and obvious. It is well accepted that valuation is not an exact science, and in the circumstances of a rent review determination, it will be rare for any error to be regarded as so significant as to be “manifest”.
However, it is also possible to take action against an independent expert for negligence if he or she fails to take due care or to exercise reasonable professional skill in carrying out the functions of an independent expert.
The question to be asked is whether the independent expert satisfied the requirement “to use the reasonable care and skill of such persons of ordinary competence measured by their professional standard of the time”.
It is also well established that an independent expert will not be negligent unless the rent determined is “significantly outside the bracket which the evidence shows to be acceptable”.
Whilst there are grounds available to challenge an independent expert’s determination, in many cases there will be a significant hurdle that the party seeking to raise a challenge will need to navigate.
Accordingly, after receiving an expert determination that is considered to be “wrong”, the recommendation is to take early advice and for the determination to be carefully analysed to understand the options that may be available.
The Future of Property Careers
Join to our panel discussion and Q&A with industry leaders on the range of opportunities within the property and construction sector.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Charles Russell Speechlys boosts private wealth offering with the hire of an international tax team
Robert Reymond will be joined at the firm by Leigh Nicoll, Emma Tyrrell and Oliver Cooper.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.
Building Back Better: Future Gazing
What’s next for the hospitality industry post-pandemic?
Building Back Better: Re-examining your proposition
Why hospitality businesses should re-examine their proposition now
Building Back Better: Real Estate and Restructuring
How and why should hospitality businesses re-structure post pandemic?
Asian Legal Business, Hubbis and eprivateclient report on the firm's expansion in Hong Kong
The firm's Hong Kong office continues to expand with the relocation of Real Estate Partner Simon Green to lead the firm’s focus in Asia.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Fudco Partnership on sale to Exponent-backed Vibrant Foods
Fudco is a family-owned business selling South Asian ethnic foods in UK and Europe.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Polar Technology on investment by BGF
Polar Technology Management Group is a holding company for engineering businesses operating at the leading edge of technology.