Business Rates – Good news for ratepayers at last
Newbigin v S J & J Monk (a firm)
The Supreme Court has handed down a unanimous judgment in favour of the ratepayer overturning the Court of Appeal decision. This is good news for developers and reinstates the practice of altering the rating list to reflect a building being in the course of refurbishment. In the context of forthcoming changes to business rates bills this judgment will provide some timely reassurance.
What is it all about?
The ratepayer stripped out their offices as a part of a redevelopment. This included removing sanitary fittings, plant and machinery, electrical wiring and taking up much of the flooring. The ratepayer proposed an amendment to the rating list from ‘offices and premises’ with a rateable value of £102,000 to ‘building undergoing refurbishment’ with a nominal value of £1 to reflect the fact that the premises were not capable of being used as offices. However, the valuation officer did not agree and the matter went to the Valuation Tribunal which decided against the proposal to alter the list. The matter went to the Upper Tribunal who found for the ratepayer but the Court of Appeal subsequently found for the valuation officer.
The case concerns the physical state in which rateable premises are assumed to be in when valuing the property. The Local Government Finance Act 1988 provides that rateable premises are in most cases valued as a tenancy from year to year on certain assumptions. One assumption is that immediately before the tenancy begins the premises are in a state of reasonable repair (the ‘repair assumption’). There is excluded from that assumption any repairs which a reasonable landlord would consider uneconomic.
The Court of Appeal determined that the premises (offices as stated in the list) would be valued in a reasonable state of repair and so there should be no alteration in the list. Replacement of the stripped out parts of the premises was described as replacement of the subsidiary parts of the whole and could fairly be described as repairs. On the facts the court determined that reinstating the premises was not uneconomic.
The Supreme Court
The unanimous decision of the Supreme Court was that the earlier decision of the Court of Appeal was ‘novel’, being a departure from the long established principle of reality. The judgment approves of the 3 stage approach submitted by the British Property Federation and Rating Surveyors’ Association as interveners in the appeal to the Supreme Court;
- Is the property is capable of rateable occupation?
- What is the mode or category of occupation?
- Is the property in a state of reasonable repair for use consistent with the mode of occupation?
The Supreme Court decided that the repair assumption applies at the third stage. At the material time the premises were not capable of beneficial occupation as offices and in accordance with the practice at the time the valuation officer should have retained an entry in the list as ‘building undergoing refurbishment’ with a nominal value.
Why does this matter?
This has an impact on the financial assessments of many construction projects. Rating surveyors can now advise their clients to propose an alteration in the rating list in appropriate cases to reduce the business rates bill whilst a property is undergoing significant works of refurbishment.
The Wider Context
The Supreme Court decision is just one of a number of recent developments. The business rates revaluation comes into force on 1 April 2017 which will mean a change in the amount that businesses pay. Many businesses, particularly in London will face a significant rise in their bills, some reporting increases of 400%. On the other hand many areas of the country will see businesses receive reduced bills, particularly in the North of England.
To help businesses adjust the government is proposing transitional measures to stagger the rises over 5 years but any reductions will also be staggered. This will be helpful to some businesses but those who would otherwise see a significant drop in their bills will see this as unfair.
There will also be changes to the way a ratepayer can challenge their bill. If a ratepayer disagrees with the rateable value, at present it proposes a new rateable value and any disputes are ultimately determined by the Valuation Tribunal. However the right to challenge rateable values is to be restricted to where it is outside reasonable professional judgment. It is not as yet clear what that means.
Other recent decisions that have affected rates bills include;
The result in Woolway v Mazars will mean that separate floors in a building leased by one tenant but accessed through common parts will often be separately assessed. Separate assessment will often increase the overall charge.
Sainsburys and others v VOA determined that ATMs within stores will be separately assessed, again usually resulting in a higher business rates charge. The judgment on appeal in the Upper Tribunal is awaited.
A complaint often heard in these cases is that the VOA is now approaching the assessment of rates in a new way from previous practice, departing from its own guidance. One explanation is that local authorities retain 50% of locally collected business rates. For cash strapped local authorities it means that they will work with the VOA to try to maximise income. There are proposals to increase the percentage that local authorities retain to 100%.
There is pressure on the government to look at wholesale reform of business rates but in the short term we will have to see if Philip Hammond can help ratepayers in the budget on 8 March.
Property Patter: The last resort – FAQs on tenant liquidation
How does liquidation work?
Leasehold Reform – The devil is in the detail
Taking a closer look at the Government's announcement in January that makes home purchase easier and cheaper for leaseholders.
Property Patter: Love Thy Neighbour - how to deal with boundary disputes
Boundary disputes often involve high levels of stress and costs.
Laura Bushaway writes for the Estates Gazette Legal Q&A on the implications of Covid-19 on business interruption policies
Laura Bushaway considers the question: Am I insured for Covid-19?
Property Patter: The “bubble wrap” option – FAQs on tenant administration
The team look at some key points on tenant administration.
David Haines and Ingrid Saffin write for Caterer Licensee on the end of the rent moratorium
With the rent moratorium due to end on 31 March, David and Ingrid emphasise the importance of communication with landlords.
‘Subject to contract’ – The effect of these words in settlement negotiations
The importance of the ‘subject to contract’ label during settlement negotiations and communications.
Leases and licences: Sizing up the available options
Lauren Fraser and Jacqueline Lean answer queries on the right of forfeiture.
Managing risk in property management companies – corporate governance and considerations for directors
We take a closer look at the guide launched by the Companies House highlighting key considerations for flat management company directors.
Property Patter: What can the property world expect from Parliament and the courts in 2021?
Our team look at what’s ahead in the world of property law
Lease renewals in the time of coronavirus
What flexibility tenants and landlord are going to have when negotiating on the terms of the lease renewal ?
The journey begins….destination : commonhold
Following the Government's press release today, read what it means for the residential sector here.
Lifting the stay on residential possession proceedings: where are we now?
The stay on all forms of possession proceedings was lifted in September, but implications for landlords still remain.
Beyond Brexit: What is the position for cross-border disputes now?
EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement was signed on 30 December 2020, what does it mean for cross-border disputes now?
Emma Humphreys writes for Expert Witness Journal on restrictive covenants
Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 31 March 2021
As the restrictions are extended, read what it means for you here
Need to Know: Dealing with 2020’s December Quarter Day
What you need to know for this Quarter Day.
Abandoned premises: Abandon hope, all ye who seek re-entry?
What can landlords do when tenants are leaving premises abandoned without prior notice due to the evolving coronavirus crisis?
Emma Humphreys appears on Estates Gazette’s Top 10 Cases of 2020 podcast on the significance of Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd
Megan Davies wrote for the Estates Gazette Legal Q&A on terminating contracts due to matters of materiality