Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR)
Introduced in 2014, and expanded in 2017, Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR) allows individuals to help social enterprises grow by offering a tax relief on investments.
Under SITR an individual can subscribe for shares in, or lend money to, a social enterprise and claim 30% income tax relief. If, for example, an investor lends £1,000 to a social enterprise, the real cost to the investor is only £700. But the social enterprise receives £1,000 of much needed funding to help it grow in a sustainable manner and achieve more positive social impact.
Charities, community interest companies, certain kinds of community benefit societies and so-called “accredited social impact contractors”1 qualify as “social enterprises” for the purposes of SITR. Social enterprises that have been generating sales revenues for less than 7 years can raise up to £1.5m under SITR. Older enterprises can raise up to around £280k-£290K2.
Here are the tax reliefs that an investor, under SITR, may enjoy:
- Income Tax Relief – 30% of the amount invested is deducted from the investor’s income tax liability for the year in which the investment is made.
- Capital Gains Tax Deferral – if a chargeable gain is re-invested into a SITR-qualifying investment, the CGT liability on that gain is deferred until the SITR investment is disposed of.
- Tax Free Gains – gains made on disposal are free of capital gains tax. But this only applies to capital gains – e.g. on sales of shares. Interest and redemption premium on debt would be taxed as income and are therefore not tax free.
Investments in shares may qualify for exemption from inheritance tax if they have been held for at least two years before death. Investments by way of loans will not, however, qualify for any exemption from IHT.
Investments in shares may qualify for loss relief against income or capital gains tax, but debt will not qualify for loss relief against income tax and only qualifies for relief against capital gains in certain circumstances.
Investors looking to make investments under SITR may invest in individual social enterprises, or via a SITR “fund”. SITR funds work in exactly the same way as an unapproved EIS fund, namely:
- Each investor signs some form of investment management agreement which gives a mandate to the fund manager to invest the investor’s money into social enterprises eligible for SITR.
- Investors’ monies are invested over a period of time (usually spanning two or three tax years).
- Each time a SITR-qualifying investment is made by the fund, each investor is allocated a proportion of the investment and tax relief is then claimed on that investment.
- The investment is typically held in the name of a nominee on behalf of each of the investors in the fund.
- Unlike EIS, there is no concept of an “approved” SITR fund. Tax relief can only therefore be claimed as and when qualifying investments are made via the fund – there is no tax relief when an investor initially commits monies to the fund. However, an investor may be able to carry back an investment to the previous tax year in order to accelerate the claim for income tax relief.
The Chancellor’s decision in the Spring Budget to extend SITR until April 2023 means that the immediate prospect of losing it altogether has been avoided for the time being. The two-year extension has been welcomed by many as a positive step. Big Society Capital, along with Social Enterprise UK, Resonance and Co-ops UK, had campaigned to retain and develop SITR. It still has significant potential to stimulate investment in charities and social enterprises, providing much-needed, affordable investment to these organisations. The extension does, however, beg the question of the kind of reforms currently needed to enable SITR to achieve its full potential. Now that a decision about SITR has been made, there is the possibility that it may result in adjustments to the scheme to render it more beneficial such as:
- Allowing a wider range of charities and social enterprises to be eligible by removing the restrictions that exclude larger charities.
- Allowing a wider range of activities by extending the accreditation scheme for nursing and care homes to cover other excluded activities.
- Taking advantage of the opportunities offered by the post-Brexit landscape (the government is currently consulting on a replacement state aid regime, offering the hope that SITR may have greater flexibility in the future).
1 Newly-incorporated private companies that enter into social impact contracts and are accredited by DCMS.
2 The exact cap is calculated by reference to the exchange rate with the Euro, and the highest UK rate of capital gains tax and will therefore fluctuate.
Hugh Gunson and Guy Bud write for the Tax Journal on the Court of Appeal’s recent judgment in Hoey
Hoey: you’d better PAYE up
David Berry provides comment for CITMA Review on sustainability in the legal sector
“Trying to cut corners or failing to take these efforts seriously would be a huge mistake.”
Charles Russell Speechlys acts for Maitland Medical Services Ltd on its acquisition of Soma Health Limited
We have advised Maitland Medical Services Ltd on its acquisition of Soma Health Limited.
Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the statutory residence test
The statutory residence test: an exceptionally useful case on ‘exceptional circumstances’
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero on the acquisition of OnTech
Zenzero is one of the fastest growing service providers in the UK, supporting over 10,000 users across a variety of industries.
Hoey: you’d better PAYE up
Hugh Gunson and Guy Bud discuss the Court of Appeal’s recent judgment in Hoey, and the implications this has on PAYE and the TOAA regime.
Mind your business: Safeguarding your business against loss of mental capacity
Practical considerations to safeguard your business against loss of mental capacity.
Jack Carter writes for eprivateclient on the registration requirements for trust structures holding UK real estate
Trust structures holding UK real estate: Reporting requirements under the Register of Overseas Entities
PART 36— A move towards greater flexibility?
Discussing the possibility of the Part 36 regime opening up with recent developments.
FT Wealth quotes Sarah Anticoni on forum shopping
"Being the first to file for divorce is not a foolproof way of securing an English hearing"
What can UK investors interested in Life Sciences learn from their more experienced, including US, counterparts?
The recent tie-up between Canary Wharf and Kadans demonstrates the enthusiasm to access the lucrative UK life sciences market.
The hurdles in establishing retrospective validation of post-petition dispositions
A discussion on the key takeaways from ICC Judge Barbers recent case ruling.
Helen Coward writes for Tax Journal on the main purpose test for SDLT group relief
Mainly ignored? The main purpose test for SDLT group relief
The Ayes have it - Collateral Warranties can be a ‘Construction Contract’
The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Limited v Simply Construct (UK) LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Caretech Holdings PLC on its proposed £870.3 million take private
Charles Russell Speechlys is advising the independent board of Caretech Holdings PLC, in its take private sale to Amalfi Bidco Limited.
A guide to protecting non-matrimonial assets in divorce
Learn what you need to know about non-marital assets and how to protect them in a divorce.
Charles Russell Speechlys advising Battery Ventures on the sale of SPT Labtech for £650 million.
Battery Ventures has raised over $9 billion to invest in software and services, enterprise infrastructure, and much more around the world.
Alexia Egger Castillo
Wealth Structuring Developments In Switzerland
Careful considerations need to be given when setting up wealth and estate structures and vesting funds in them.
New Legislation on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgements in Matrimonial and Family cases by the Courts Hong Kong and the Mainland
The implementation of the Ordinance offers better safeguards to the interests of parties to cross-border marriages.
EG quotes Emma Preece on the Picturehouse and BNY Mellon rent arrears cases
“The case is being closely watched by landlords and tenants alike as the impact of the pandemic lives on in the commercial property sector”