Co-owning a property: know your oranges
The decision as to how to hold the beneficial interest in a co-owned property is one which requires some thought, and is relevant for anyone who co-owns (or is considering co-owning) their home.
You’re probably aware that co-owners hold the legal interest in their property jointly. However, you may not be aware that co-owners also have a ‘beneficial’ interest in the property, and that this interest is held in one of two ways: as joint tenants, or as tenants in common. Which is the best option will depend on the co-owners’ circumstances. The distinction is important in a number of scenarios, particularly where:
- An unmarried couple purchase a house together, or contributions are not equal;
- You plan to leave your share in a property in your will; or
- You would like to contribute towards your child’s home purchase, and they plan to co-own.
Joint tenancy or tenancy in common?
Think of the beneficial interest as an orange.
When you hold as beneficial joint tenants, it’s one, solid orange. There are no segments you can remove which are yours and yours alone to deal with as you please. You can’t leave a share in the property to someone in your will, as the property automatically passes to the surviving joint tenant(s). On a sale of the property, joint tenants are jointly entitled to the whole (in the absence of any agreement to the contrary). Married couples often hold as joint tenants, happy for the property to pass automatically to their spouse in the event of their death, regardless of what their will says.
Tenants in common each have their own segments of the orange. The size of the shares is agreed (50/50, 60/40 etc.); particularly useful if one party is making a larger contribution to the deposit and/or mortgage repayments. On a sale of the property, tenants in common are entitled to their relative share of the sale proceeds, and can also leave their share to a donee of their choice in their will.
Changing your mind
You can change how you hold the beneficial interest. If you hold as beneficial joint tenants and want to become tenants in common, you can do so with a ‘notice of severance’. Basically, as the name suggests, it’s the legal process of slicing up the orange.
In the recent case of Lee v Lee, an incorrect notice of severance almost prevented a son from inheriting his full share of his parents’ property on his father’s death. The court saw it appropriate to rectify the notice due to the circumstances of this particular case, but not everyone might be so lucky. The case highlights the importance of ensuring your property is held as you wish, and that your plans are legally possible.
A solicitor can help you to decide how you wish to hold the beneficial interest in your property and on the process if you want to change. You should also keep in mind that there may well be tax implications, which will also require discussion and advice.
This article was written by William Marriott. If you would like to speak to him about any aspect of buying, selling or owning a house, email him at firstname.lastname@example.org or call him on +44 (0) 1483 252 519.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Guildford Games Developer Community on the launch of Guildford.Games Ltd
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised the Guildford.Games committee, a not-for-profit initiative, on the formation of Guildford.Games Ltd
Alexia Egger Castillo
Inheritance contracts: An unknown planning tool for Brits with assets in Switzerland?
How you choose to dispose of your estate after death requires careful consideration, especially where assets are in multiple jurisdictions
Construction News quotes David Savage on the slight rise in construction output in September
"It remains to be seen how the sector reacted in October amid the political turmoil"
How final is a Final Certificate?
A recent Scottish case grappled with the complexities of a smash and grab adjudication.
HR Magazine quotes Nick Hawkins on a pregnancy discrimination case and what companies need to be mindful of
Pregnant worker given parenting tips before sacking wins tribunal case
Court of Appeal decides defective notice to quit not saved by 'Mannai' principles
The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the second appeal in O G Thomas Amaethyddiath v Turner & Ors  EWCA Civ 1446.
“Truss me, I quit!” - 5 Tips to Handle Unexpected Resignations and Post-employment Grievances
Read our guidance for employers on dealing with unexpected and “heat of the moment” resignations
Sarah Jane Boon
The Independent quotes Sarah Jane Boon on the 9.6% divorce increase in 2021
ONS statistics - Divorces in England and Wales: 2021
Appointing a Director
This article explores some of the ways that additional directors can be appointed.
Charles Russell Speechlys succeed in Greggs v Zurich Covid-19 insurance trial
Charles Russell Speechlys successfully act for Greggs in landmark business interruption trial
Roger Elford writes for EG on the UK restructuring regime
Is the UK restructuring regime fit for purpose?
Riparian Owners: What are your rights and responsibilities?
Learn about Riparian land ownership and the associated rights and responsibilities.
What’s new in employment law podcast: Innovative reward schemes
As employers compete for the best talent, looking at new ways to reward staff is a key driver for recruitment and retention.
Sophie Rothwell writes for Employment Law Journal on demystifying employment contracts
Demystifying employment contracts: Beyond the basics
Top 10 Tips: The Registration Gap
The Land Registry is reporting its longest delays in registrations in years.
Q&A: Clarifying points on eviction
Brooke Lyne is a barrister at Landmark Chambers and Emma Preece discuss points on eviction
The Mail Online quotes David Gregory on the mini budget and changes to the real estate industry
"This is a step in the right direction, but further support for existing occupiers may be needed..."
Piers Master and Jack Carter write for International Adviser on the register of overseas entities
How UK register of overseas entities impacts advice clients
The Grocer quotes Jamie Cartwright on the Celia Marsh inquest and allergen action
“Natasha’s Law responded to a perceived lack of accessible information on ingredients for consumers on the product itself..."
The Telegraph quotes Penelope Byatt on the proposed sale of the Trevalga estate
“Many charities do carry on for hundreds of years ... They’re not subjected to this requirement"