• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments 2023 - Bahrain

Charles Russell Speechlys exclusively contribute to the Lexology GTDT, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments 2023, Bahrain chapter.

LEGISLATION

Treaties
Is your country party to any bilateral or multilateral treaties for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments? What is the country’s approach to entering into these treaties, and what, if any, amendments or reservations has your country made to such treaties?

Bahrain is a signatory to a number of bilateral and multilateral recognition treaties. These include:

  • the Hague Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes 1907;
  • the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States 1965;
  • the Riyadh Arab Agreement for Judicial Cooperation 1983 (the Riyadh Convention);
  • the Gulf Cooperation Council Convention for the Execution of Judgments, Delegations and Judicial Notifications1995; and
  • various bilateral investment treaties and free trade agreements.

As a general rule, the Bahraini courts will enforce foreign judgments without requiring prior recognition proceedings as long as the judgment originates from a country that is also a signatory to one of the same treaties.

Where reciprocal recognition is not established via treaty between Bahrain and the foreign country, the recognition of foreign judgments is governed by article 16 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021 on the Promulgation of the Execution Law in Civil and Commercial Matters (effective as of 17 March 2022) (Decree-Law No. 22/2021) and foreign judgments may still be recognised following an application to the Bahraini High Civil Court. This is essentially a fresh claim in which the court may choose to re-examine the issues, should the defendant submit a defence.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Intra-state variations
Is there uniformity in the law on the enforcement of foreign judgments among differentjurisdictions within the country?

Yes, all judgments capable of being enforced in accordance with Bahraini law requirements are treated the same for the purpose of enforcement, subject to certain caveats.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Sources of law
What are the sources of law regarding the enforcement of foreign judgments?

In Bahrain, the primary source of law regarding the enforcement of foreign judgments is Decree-Law No. 22/2021. This governs the treatment of foreign judgments and the limitations on enforcement of foreign judgments.

The recognition of foreign judgments may be subject to principles of Islamic law to the extent that the enforcement of such may risk contradicting Islamic Law provisions in Bahrain.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Hague Convention requirements
To the extent the enforcing country is a signatory of the Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, will the court require strict compliance with its provisions before recognising a foreign judgment?

Bahraini courts will not enforce a foreign judgment unless the foreign court that handed down the judgment is competent in accordance with the international rules of jurisdiction set down in the laws of that country. The court judgment must also be final in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction of the court handing down the judgment. Subject to this, and other public policy requirements, the Bahraini courts would be willing to enforce a foreign judgment.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

BRINGING A CLAIM FOR ENFORCEMENT

Limitation periods
What is the limitation period for enforcement of a foreign judgment? When does it commence to run? In what circumstances would the enforcing court consider the statute of limitations of the foreign jurisdiction?

There are no specific provisions in Decree-Law No. 22/2021 on the Promulgation of the Execution Law in Civil and Commercial Matters (effective as of 17 March 2022) (Decree-Law No. 22/2021) regarding the limitation periods for enforcement of a foreign judgment.

Under Bahraini law, all civil claims are subject to the statute of limitations, which prescribes a general limitation period of 15 years (from the date the cause of action arose) unless the law provides for another period. There are shorter limitation periods applicable that vary depending on the nature of the claim. For instance, commercial claims are generally barred after 10 years from the date of due performance of the commercial obligation.

Any judgment being enforced in Bahrain must be final and enforceable in accordance with the laws of its originating country or courts.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Types of enforceable order
Which remedies ordered by a foreign court are enforceable in your jurisdiction?

All judgments must be final to be recognised and enforced by the Bahraini courts. Provided that a certificate of final judgment or enforceability can be obtained from the country in which the judgment was obtained, default and summary judgments can also be recognised and enforced in Bahrain.

Enforcement of an interim judgment will be difficult to enforce in Bahrain as it would not be deemed ‘final’ for the purposes of article 16 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021.

As to the remedies ordered in a foreign judgment, provided that these do not constitute a breach of public order or policy in Bahrain, there is no restriction on the type of remedy that the Bahraini courts can enforce.

Once the foreign judgment is recognised, a judge of the execution court may issue the orders and decisions generally available for the enforcement of domestic judgments, including:

  • specific performance and associated fines;
  • placement of attachment on bank accounts, properties and movable assets or lifting of such attachment;
  • sale of property that is under attachment;
  • imprisonment of a party who obstructs the execution procedures or fails to cooperate with the execution proceedings;
  • payment of amounts collected from the judgment debtor to the judgment creditor or surrender of the disputed items to the latter party;
  • precautionary or provisional measures such as freezing orders; appointment of a guardian, custodial or judicial receiver over assets;
  • orders to prevent assets from being removed from the jurisdiction; or
  • authorising the use of force whenever required and seeking the assistance of the police, if necessary.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Competent courts
Must cases seeking enforcement of foreign judgments be brought in a particular court?

Applications for recognition of foreign judgments and enforcement orders are made to the High Court (article 16 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021).

Recognised judgments or enforcement orders are then enforced, together with local court judgments, by the court of execution, in accordance with article 1 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021: 'The Courts of Execution shall be competent to enforce writs of execution. Execution shall take place under the supervision and control of the Judge of the Court of Execution, and a sufficient number of private execution persons to assist him in the execution procedures.'

Article 2 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021 defines ‘writs of execution’ as ‘judgments and decisions made by the courts in their various kind and degrees, arbitral awards, after ordering their enforcement by the competent court, authenticated deeds, conciliation reports that are ratified by the courts, and any other documents so characterised by law'.

Therefore, the execution courts will deal with foreign judgments being enforced under any applicable treaty or agreement, foreign judgments that have been recognised by the Bahraini courts and foreign judgments confirmed by the Bahraini courts following them being heard as a fresh case.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Separation of recognition and enforcement
To what extent is the process for obtaining judicial recognition of a foreign judgment separate from the process for enforcement?

The recognition procedure is started by bringing the foreign judgment before the Bahraini High Civil Court, requesting that such judgment is recognised, paying the prescribed court fees and requesting an enforcement order.

Once recognised, enforcement of the judgment is then undertaken by the Bahraini Court of Execution. Domestic authorities must execute the foreign judgments as issued (ie, not in-part) provided that they do not constitute a breach of public policy.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

OPPOSITION

Defences
Can a defendant raise merits-based defences to liability or to the scope of the award entered in the foreign jurisdiction, or is the defendant limited to more narrow grounds for challenging a foreign judgment?

In accordance with articles 22 and 23 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021 on the Promulgation of the Execution Law in Civil and Commercial Matters (effective as of 17 March 2022), the role of the execution court is to enforce the judgments received without entertaining objections by a party to the judgment itself. If there appears to be any element of a judgment that is practically unenforceable, an execution court judge must not offer any opinion as to the resolution
thereof and shall instead seek a clarification of the relevant section in writing from the court that handed down the judgment.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Injunctive relief
May a party obtain injunctive relief to prevent foreign judgment enforcement proceedings in your jurisdiction?

Various enforcement or injunctive relief procedures are available against individuals or companies and their assets. These forms of relief are most commonly sought domestically through either the Court of Urgent Matters (at the beginning or during proceedings) or from the execution court when enforcing a final judgment.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

REQUIREMENTS FOR RECOGNITION

Basic requirements for recognition
What are the basic mandatory requirements for recognition of a foreign judgment?

Under article 16(3) of Decree-Law No. 22/2021 on the Promulgation of the Execution Law in Civil and Commercial Matters (effective as of 17 March 2022) (Decree-Law No. 22/2021), no enforcement order of a foreign country judgment may be passed except after ascertaining the following:

  • that the courts of Bahrain are not competent to hear the case in respect of which the court judgment or order was passed, and that the foreign courts that passed it are competent in accordance with the international rules of jurisdiction set down in the laws thereof;
  • that the litigants in the case in respect of which the judgment was issued were duly summoned and properly represented;
  • that the judgment or order has become final in accordance with the law of the court that passed it; and
  • that the judgment or order does not conflict with any judgment or order previously passed by the courts of Bahrain and does not provide for anything that constitutes a breach of public policy or morality.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Other factors
May other non-mandatory factors for recognition of a foreign judgment be considered and, if so, what factors?

The treatment of foreign judgments may depend on the country from which the judgment originates and whether a treaty exists between Bahrain and that country.

A party seeking recognition of a foreign judgment in Bahrain must be aware that, while the Civil and Commercial Law of Bahrain is not governed primarily by Islamic law, the courts will consider certain principles of Islamic law as forming part of Bahrain’s public policy, and therefore may refer to paragraph 3(4) of article 16 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021 to justify rehearing the case.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Procedural equivalence
Is there a requirement that the judicial proceedings where the judgment was entered correspond to due process in your jurisdiction and, if so, how is that requirement evaluated?

Other than certain limited provisions for reciprocal recognition and enforcement proceedings, there is no requirement for the due process under a foreign jurisdiction to correspond with that in Bahrain for a judgment to be enforceable.

The due process that must, however, have been complied with in all cases is that litigants to the case in respect of which the judgment was issued were duly summoned and properly represented. Evidence of this will need to be provided to the High Court as part of any application for recognition.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

JURISDICTION OF THE FOREIGN COURT

Personal jurisdiction
Will the enforcing court examine whether the court where the judgment was entered had personal jurisdiction over the defendant and, if so, how is that requirement met?

The Bahraini High Civil Court will evaluate whether the foreign courts that handed down the judgment were competent in accordance with the international rules of jurisdiction set down in the laws of that country.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Subject-matter jurisdiction
Will the enforcing court examine whether the court where the judgment was entered had subjectmatter jurisdiction over the controversy and, if so, how is that requirement met?

Part of the Bahraini High Civil Court’s assessment of competency of the issuing court may involve a subject-matter jurisdiction assessment. However, insofar as the judgment overcomes the steps listed in paragraph 3 of article 16 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021 on the Promulgation of the Execution Law in Civil and Commercial Matters (effective as of 17 March 2022), the Court will not retry the merits of the case.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Service
Must the defendant have been technically or formally served with notice of the original action in the foreign jurisdiction, or is actual notice sufficient? How much notice is usually considered sufficient?

The defendant must have been properly served with notice of the original action in accordance with the laws governing service in that country. The Bahraini High Civil Court will evaluate whether the litigants in the case in which the judgment was issued were duly summoned and evidence of such should be presented together with any recognition application.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Fairness of foreign jurisdiction
Will the court consider the relative inconvenience of the foreign jurisdiction to the defendant as a basis for declining to enforce a foreign judgment?

Provided the Bahraini courts are satisfied that the foreign court, and not the local courts, had jurisdiction to hear the matter, an inconvenience to the defendant vis-à-vis foreign jurisdiction is not a consideration of the Bahraini courts when deciding on a recognition and enforcement application.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

EXAMINATION OF THE FOREIGN JUDGMENT

Vitiation by fraud
Will the court examine the foreign judgment for allegations of fraud upon the defendant or the court?

The Bahraini High Civil Court will evaluate the foreign judgment on certain terms, including whether it contains anything that constitutes a breach of public policy, and if so, it will not be recognised. Where there is reciprocity, the merits and the arguments made in the judgment are not assessed by the Bahraini courts.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Public policy
Will the court examine the foreign judgment for consistency with the enforcing jurisdiction’s public policy and substantive laws?

Paragraph 3(4) of article 16 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021 on the Promulgation of the Execution Law in Civil and Commercial Matters (effective as of 17 March 2022) (Decree-Law No. 22/2021) allows for the Bahraini High Civil Courts to ensure that the foreign judgment would not be inconsistent with the ‘public order or morality’ of Bahrain.

This principle is established in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and enshrined in some treaties themselves. For example, recognition of a foreign judgment is also capable of rejection under the Riyadh Arab Agreement for Judicial Cooperation 1983 (the Riyadh Convention) (of which Bahrain is a member) if such recognition would contradict the principles of Islamic law or the constitution and public order of the requested country.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Conflicting decisions
What will the court do if the foreign judgment sought to be enforced is in conflict with another final and conclusive judgment involving the same parties or parties in privity?

One of the pillars of enforcement by the Bahraini execution courts for foreign judgments is that they will not enforce any foreign judgment that conflicts with a previous decision or order of a Bahraini court.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Enforcement against third parties
Will a court apply the principles of agency or alter ego to enforce a judgment against a party other than the named judgment debtor?

It will be within the discretion of the court of execution whether the enforcement against a third party would be effective. However, this may depend upon whether that third party was duly summoned and properly represented.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Alternative dispute resolution
What will the court do if the parties had an enforceable agreement to use alternative dispute resolution, and the defendant argues that this requirement was not followed by the party seeking to enforce?

Under article 16 of Decree-Law No. 22/2021, the Bahraini High Civil Court must be satisfied that the foreign courts that passed the judgment were competent to have heard the case and the procedural rules of that jurisdiction were followed. This may include whether the original judgment was heard by the correct means and forum.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Favourably treated jurisdictions
Are judgments from some foreign jurisdictions given greater deference than judgments from others? If so, why?

Article 1 of the Gulf Cooperation Council Convention for the Execution of Judgments, Delegations and Judicial Notifications 1995 (the GCC Convention), of which Bahrain is a member, states that each of the GCC countries shall:

Enforcement under the Riyadh Convention (article 32) requires the competent judicial body to establish that the judgment complies with the provisions of the Riyadh Convention and to confirm this in its judgment. The competent body will then order that appropriate measures be taken to give the judgment the same enforceable status as it would have had if it had been made by the requested party.

In the absence of a treaty such as the GCC Convention or the Riyadh Convention, or in the absence of a principle of reciprocity between Bahrain and the jurisdiction in which the foreign judgment originates, a fresh claim must be filed before the competent court requesting that it acknowledges and recognises the judgment. The foreign judgment may be used as evidence in support of this application.

It may be said, therefore, that judgments subject to reciprocal treaties, such as the GCC Convention or the Riyadh Convention, are given greater deference than non-treaty jurisdiction judgments.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Alteration of awards
Will a court ever recognise only part of a judgment, or alter or limit the damage award?

If the award is recognised, a party must seek enforcement from the Bahraini court of execution. Domestic authorities must execute the foreign judgments as issued (ie, not in-part) provided that they do not contradict shariah law and public policy.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

AWARDS AND SECURITY FOR APPEALS

Currency, interest, costs
In recognising a foreign judgment, does the court convert the damage award to local currency and take into account such factors as interest and court costs and exchange controls? If interest claims are allowed, which law governs the rate of interest?

In recognising a foreign judgment, the Bahraini courts will determine the judgment amount in the currency of the country in which the judgment originates or its equivalent in Bahraini dinars. Interest is recoverable in Bahrain and the rates of interest are enforced in accordance with the provisions for the same as set out in the judgment.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Security
Is there a right to appeal from a judgment recognising or enforcing a foreign judgment? If so, what procedures, if any, are available to ensure the judgment will be enforceable against the defendant if and when it is affirmed?

To appeal a foreign judgment that has been enforced by a Bahraini court of execution, a party must submit an
application to the Bahraini High Court.

To protect the recovery position, concurrent applications can be made to freeze a defendant’s assets at the time of filing recognition proceedings. Appeals to recognition and enforcement orders do not usually have the effect of staying the enforcement proceedings.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

ENFORCEMENT AND PITFALLS

Enforcement process
Once a foreign judgment is recognised, what is the process for enforcing it in your jurisdiction?

Enforcement of final judgments in Bahrain is carried out predominantly by the execution court. As with any jurisdiction, the length of time it takes for a judgment to be settled is almost entirely reliant on the availability of the debtor’s assets.

The Bahraini execution court is efficient and dependable, with systems in place for timely recovery should assets be available.

The swiftest recovery option is liquid assets held by the banks in Bahrain. The execution court requests the debtor’s cash asset position from the Central Bank of Bahrain and, should there be monies held, the execution court will issue an order that an amount up to the value of the judgment be frozen and transferred to the court account. In these circumstances, enforcement can take as little as eight weeks.

If, however, there are no liquid assets available, and property is required to be seized and auctioned, or judicial receivers appointed to manage property (for example, in the case of a business or rental property), the time period for enforcement can extend considerably. There is no fixed amount of time for recovery in these circumstances and they are dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

The execution court fees are governed by Legislative Decree No. (3) of 1972 (as amended). In accordance with this legislation, the execution court charges a fee per enforcement order – this means that each application for a freeze or a seizure of assets is charged separately in accordance with the value of the claim.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

Pitfalls
What are the most common pitfalls in seeking recognition or enforcement of a foreign judgment in your jurisdiction?

Parties seeking to enforce foreign judgments in Bahrain should be aware of the following:

  • Parties cannot undertake this either themselves or using their foreign jurisdiction lawyers as there is no right of audience for non-Bahraini qualified lawyers in the Bahraini courts relevant to recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Bahraini counsel will need to be engaged to file proceedings and appear at court.
  • All original documents will need to be legalised or apostilled (depending on whether the originating country is a
    party to the Apostille Convention).
  • All documents will need to be translated into Arabic by a court-certified translator.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

UPDATE AND TRENDS

Hot topics
Are there any emerging trends or hot topics in foreign judgment enforcement in your jurisdiction?

Bahrain now allows parties to use the English language as an official court language, subject to other conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 117 of 2021 issued by the Minister of Justice. It would therefore appear that Bahrain may be headed towards recognising the English language as an official language of the court, which would include recognising foreign judgments or awards issued in English without requiring translations.

Law stated - 03 August 2022

 

Our thinking

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Has a new route to recovery opened up for victims of banking payment frauds?

    Katie Bewick

    Insights

  • New Tools for Fraud and Asset Tracing between Hong Kong and China?

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Thomas Snider, Reem Faqihi and Dalal Alhouti discuss the impact of technology on the arbitration landscape for Legal Community MENA

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Europlasma in takeover bid of MG-Valdunes

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Breaking Barriers: The Tech Revolution in Arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • Forbes quotes Gareth Mills on the US government’s antitrust lawsuit against Apple

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • The role of national courts in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expansion into Singapore accelerates with new Partner hire

    Peter Brabant

    News

  • Embracing AI's potential in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Thomas Snider, Patrick Gearon and Dalal Alhouti discuss the impact of AI on international arbitration for Legal Community MENA

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • Stewart Hey, Hugh Gunson and Rachel Warren write for Solicitor's Journal on the cum-cum scandal

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Drafting the “perfect” arbitration agreement

    Alim Khamis FCIArb

    Insights

  • Peter Smith shares his thoughts on digital asset disputes for Legal Community MENA

    Peter Smith

    In the Press

  • A Modern Marriage: How AI Powered By Blockchain Could Protect IP Rights

    Shennind Awat-Ranai

    Insights

  • Unlocking Digital Asset Disputes: Strategies for Success

    Peter Smith

    Insights

  • Expert Evidence - Avoiding fatal failure

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Dawn raids... a new dawn?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • Abu Dhabi’s New Arbitral Centre Unveils its Rules

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Nigeria's challenge to US$11 billion award succeeds in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales

    John Olatunji

    Quick Reads

  • An important reminder for employers on World Menopause Day

    Isobel Goodman

    Quick Reads

  • UAE Polishes Federal Arbitration Law

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • What next for HS2?

    Richard Flenley

    Quick Reads

  • Mediation as a pillar of dispute resolution: it’s happening, embrace it

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

    Rory Partridge

    Quick Reads

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Pandora Papers: HMRC nudge taxpayers to come out of their box

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • DIAC Issues First Annual Report

    Georgia Fullarton

    Quick Reads

  • Dispute Resolution: The Case for Mediation

    Marjan Mirrezaei

    Quick Reads

  • Machinery Regulations respond to the rise of AI

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

Back to top