Too much information? A significant development in HMRC powers
Recent years have seen a major increase both in HMRC's powers and also the information at HMRC's disposal. The Finance Bill 2020/21 published this week introduces a further measure giving HMRC a significant new power to obtain information.
The draft rules introduce the concept of a Financial Institution Notice (FIN), as an addition to HMRC's existing formal information powers. This will allow HMRC to issue notices to banks and other financial institutions (including credit card companies) placing them under a legal obligation to provide documents or information about a particular taxpayer. Importantly, HMRC will be able to do this themselves, without the taxpayer's agreement or the approval of the tax tribunal (as is the case under the existing rules).
There are various safeguards, including that (in HMRC's reasonable opinion) the production of the documents or information is not onerous. Generally, a taxpayer must be notified of an FIN, together with the reasons for it, although HMRC can apply to the tax tribunal to dispense with this requirement if to do so might prejudice the assessment of tax. A number of the existing safeguards in the information notice regime also apply to FINs, including importantly that they cannot require the production of legally privileged material.
The stated purpose of the changes is to speed up HMRC's information-gathering process, in particular where HMRC is complying with information requests from other jurisdictions under tax treaties and conventions. The draft legislation however goes much further than that. Financial institutions can expect to see a sharp increase in HMRC notices once these rules come into force.
Another point to consider is the territorial scope of FINs. In recent cases, it has been held that HMRC can issue both notices direct to taxpayers and third party notices outside the jurisdiction (see Jimenez  EWCA Civ 51 and PQ v HMRC  UKFTT 371), albeit the Jimenez case is currently under appeal to the Supreme Court. We might similarly expect HMRC to seek to issue FINs to non-UK financial institutions. Arguably this cuts across the existing network of tax treaties and conventions for the cross-border exchange of information; and there may also be issues to consider around local laws (eg around banking secrecy). Developments in this area will be worth watching.
In summary, the FIN is a powerful new weapon for HMRC in tax enquiries and investigations. Financial institutions and taxpayers alike should be prepared for HMRC to deploy these with increasing regularity - and when faced with one they should ensure they are fully aware of their legal obligations.
Eyes on the road: automated vehicles are closer than we think
Sonia looks at automated vehicles, specifically, the automated lane keep system technology known as ALKS
Property Patter: the tactics of settlement offers
What impact can settlement offers have on costs?
A secret will, for the moment
Caroline Greenwell and Peter Carlyon write for New Law Journal on the issue of companies exaggerating their green credentials
The extent and impact of greenwashing by companies, the reputational damage where they’re caught out and potential regulatory action.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon, Georgina Munnik, Sam Saunders and Simone Sancandi produce the Chambers Global Practice Guide on the enforcement of judgments in Bahrain
Phase out of temporary restrictions on use of winding up petitions
Hannah takes a look at the recent UK Government announcement on statutory demands and the presentation of winding up petitions
WHAT NEXT FOR NIGHTCLUBS?
Hugh Gunson quoted by the Daily Express on IR35 tax fines following the news that HMRC was forced to issue tax penalties to several Government departments
HMRC was forced to issue several Government departments with tax penalties in recent months as IR35 failings were unearthed.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon and Haleema Wahid write for The Oath on the rise of litigation
Patrick and Haleema consider some of the litigation funding options available in the UAE, with a particular emphasis on third-party funding.
Gareth Mills writes for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on technology disputes in Bahrain
The most common disputes occur following perceived or actual failures to deliver required technology services an lack of clarity.
International Arbitration in India and Around the World
Rupa Lakha joined the panel discussing the latest developments in construction and dispute resolution.
Gabrielle Shovlin writes for the Practical Law Dispute Resolution Blog on when witness evidence waives privilege
Be careful what you reference: when witness evidence waives privilege.
Be careful what you reference: when witness evidence waives privilege
Gabrielle looks at the recent decision in Scipharm Sarl v Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and its impact on privilege
Hugh Gunson quoted by Accountancy Age on why HMRC needs to rebuild taxpayers' trust after its Loan Charge failings
"HMRC needs to listen to the criticisms made in relation to its handling of the loan charge and reflect on them to achieve real change."
Ongoing supply chain crisis looms large over upcoming allergen law change
Ghassan El Daye
Emaratyah, Al Bayan Newspaper and 24.ae publish comments from Ghassan El Daye on the UAE’s new federal law to establish a National Human Rights Institution
Ghassan comments on the latest proposals to establish a National Human Rights Institution.
The Digital Dispute Resolution Rules – How Novel Are They?
Sonia takes an in-depth look at The Digital Dispute Resolution Rules
Ghassan El Daye
Al Bayan Newspaper quote Ghassan El Daye on the move by the UAE’s Federal Public Prosecution to allow the payment of fines through instalments
The UAE Courts have ensured that services are made available to provide alternative and more accessible options.
Paula Boast, Thanos Karvelis, Niel Coertse and Mazin Al Mardhi write for the International Comparative Legal Guide - International Arbitration 2021
The guide covers common issues in international arbitration laws and regulations across 36 jurisdictions.
Scope of an adviser’s duty of care: a purposive approach
The Supreme Court provides guidance on determining the scope of a defendant adviser’s duty of care.