Too much information? A significant development in HMRC powers
Recent years have seen a major increase both in HMRC's powers and also the information at HMRC's disposal. The Finance Bill 2020/21 published this week introduces a further measure giving HMRC a significant new power to obtain information.
The draft rules introduce the concept of a Financial Institution Notice (FIN), as an addition to HMRC's existing formal information powers. This will allow HMRC to issue notices to banks and other financial institutions (including credit card companies) placing them under a legal obligation to provide documents or information about a particular taxpayer. Importantly, HMRC will be able to do this themselves, without the taxpayer's agreement or the approval of the tax tribunal (as is the case under the existing rules).
There are various safeguards, including that (in HMRC's reasonable opinion) the production of the documents or information is not onerous. Generally, a taxpayer must be notified of an FIN, together with the reasons for it, although HMRC can apply to the tax tribunal to dispense with this requirement if to do so might prejudice the assessment of tax. A number of the existing safeguards in the information notice regime also apply to FINs, including importantly that they cannot require the production of legally privileged material.
The stated purpose of the changes is to speed up HMRC's information-gathering process, in particular where HMRC is complying with information requests from other jurisdictions under tax treaties and conventions. The draft legislation however goes much further than that. Financial institutions can expect to see a sharp increase in HMRC notices once these rules come into force.
Another point to consider is the territorial scope of FINs. In recent cases, it has been held that HMRC can issue both notices direct to taxpayers and third party notices outside the jurisdiction (see Jimenez  EWCA Civ 51 and PQ v HMRC  UKFTT 371), albeit the Jimenez case is currently under appeal to the Supreme Court. We might similarly expect HMRC to seek to issue FINs to non-UK financial institutions. Arguably this cuts across the existing network of tax treaties and conventions for the cross-border exchange of information; and there may also be issues to consider around local laws (eg around banking secrecy). Developments in this area will be worth watching.
In summary, the FIN is a powerful new weapon for HMRC in tax enquiries and investigations. Financial institutions and taxpayers alike should be prepared for HMRC to deploy these with increasing regularity - and when faced with one they should ensure they are fully aware of their legal obligations.
News & Insights
Investigations: Fraud in the time of pandemic
Many business have experienced massive disruption recently, Charlotte Pender, Stewart Hey and Caroline Greenwell discuss the impact.
Untangling the Atlantic Knot: Tax reporting and compliance for US citizens living in the UK
As a US citizen, Sam must continue to report and pay taxes to the IRS. But as a UK resident, Sam also needs to navigate the UK tax system.
Furlough fraud and other errors in coronavirus support claims: last chance saloon
Hugh looks at the recent clamping down of abuse of the furlough scheme by HMRC and the impact of the Finance Act 2020.
Supreme Court decides that reflective loss rule does not bar claims made by unsecured creditors
A review of the recent Supreme Court judgment which significantly narrowed the scope of the rule against recovery of reflective loss.