Internal investigations - 6 tips on collecting documents during the COVID-19 pandemic
Conducting internal investigations during the pandemic presents a number of significant barriers. The processes used in the “old normal” may not be fit for purpose in the current stage of the crisis even though lockdown measures appear to be easing.
Collecting and reviewing documents and data is but one example. Continued restrictions on international travel and the inability (or unwillingness) of staff to access offices and storage facilities may affect a company’s ability to collect all relevant documents and data.
Here are 6 tips for running an effective data collection and review programme during the outbreak.
- Prepare prepare prepare – data mapping is crucial. This has always been a key mantra for any internal investigation - but given the complications around accessing documents it is imperative that a comprehensive custodian and data map is prepared outlining the location and recoverability of physical and electronic documents and data.
- Suspend all document destruction policies. Easier said than done currently! This requires a detailed consideration of the IT architecture that a company has. Engage with the in-house IT team or the outsourced IT provider urgently so that those with the relevant “key” can “lock” the data down. As for physical documents – do employees now have relevant documents at home
- Physical documents – consider creative ways to collate hard copy documents. With the lockdown easing, the ability to collate hard copy documents is admittedly becoming somewhat easier or at least possible. If they can be collated safely, give careful consideration to where the physical documents should be delivered. In the current circumstances that may not be a law firm’s offices. Consider whether it is necessary or cost-effective to digitise the data via scanning software given that the days of review teams being based in one central location is arguably many months away. Is there a secure hub nearer where reviewers live which they can access in a COVID-safe manner? If, however, collecting physical documents cannot be done safely, companies should carefully consider how to preserve and secure them so that they can be recovered at a later date.
- Electronic documents and data - speak to an IT forensics specialist as soon as possible and get them involved early in the data mapping process. This is one particular area where technology can be your friend. There are many ways in which IT forensic teams can help companies collate data in a remote way. This can range from the traditional attendance at offices to “image” data in person (albeit on a socially-distanced basis) to full forensic copying over the “pipes” of the relevant data.
- Personal devices – the need for robust IT policies. Hopefully the company under investigation has a robust IT policy which enables the company or its lawyers to demand the delivery of personal devices for imaging. In the lockdown, however, are employees using home PCs and other devices? Does the company’s IT policy entitle the company to demand access to these devices? What protections can be put in place to ensure that purely personal information – irrelevant to the company and the investigation – is either not collected or, at least, not reviewed.
- The miscreant’s data – an opportunity? The continued lockdown may present an opportunity. Where the investigation relates to a fraud or other misconduct by an employee, it may be easier to copy the suspect’s data from PCs and other devices which remain in the office. There may be no need for a surreptitious early morning office visit by IT forensics given that so many offices still, despite the limited easing of lockdown measures, effectively remain shut.
With a little ingenuity and creative thinking, and a lot of patience and preparation, the pandemic's barriers to an effective document collection can be overcome.
To find out more on how we can help you, please visit our Investigations page.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon, Georgina Munnik and Sam Saunders write for Lexology's Getting The Deal Through on the enforcement of foreign judgments in Bahrain
Bahrain is a signatory to a number of bilateral and multilateral reciprocal recognition treaties.
Arbitration agreements: governing law clarified and NOM clauses show their bite
Sam and Simon look at the recent developments concerning how the English courts will determine the governing law of arbitration agreements.
Samuel Jenkins and Simon Heatley write for Practical Law Magazine on the Supreme Court’s decision in Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group
The Supreme Court decision provides clarity on how the English courts will determine the governing law of arbitration agreements.
Piers Master and Peter Smith write for eprivateclient on tailoring arbitration for family offices
The advantages of arbitration over litigation as a form of dispute resolution are well-known.
Charles Russell Speechlys named in Global Restructuring Review’s GRR 100 2021
Restructuring and Insolvency team ranked in Global Restructuring Review
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon, Sara Sheffield and Peter Smith write for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on enforcement of foreign judgments in the United Arab Emirates
A quick reference guide enabling side-by-side comparison of local insights into relevant treaties, conventions and other sources of law.
Judicial Review Reform
Judicial review is a mechanism available to various interested parties to challenge the legality of decision made by a public body.
Privy Council confirms ability of courts to grant freezing injunctions in aid of foreign proceedings – but beware the minority report
Georgina looks at the landmark Privy Council judgment on freezing and interim injunctions
PSV 1982 Limited v Langdon: A Warning for Directors in Breach of Section 216 Insolvency Act 1986
Georgina takes a look at PSV 1982 Limited v Langdon
Playing fast and loose with justice: estoppel by conduct
Ben and Simon look at La Micro Group (UK) Ltd and another v La Micro Group Inc and others and its impact on estoppel
Lloyd v Google – Supreme Court to deliver judgment tomorrow (on 10 November 2021) – a reminder of the issues at stake
Ben Moore and Simon Heatley write for the Practical Law Dispute Resolution Blog on the potential for estoppel to arise based on the conduct of a party in litigation
The potential for estoppel to arise based on the conduct of a party in litigation is well established in the law of England and Wales.
Black Swans freezing in BVI but not migrating
No service-out gateway for BVI Black Swan injunctions, but so what?
Gareth Mills, Georgina Munnik and Thomas Catto write for The Technology Disputes Law Review on Bahrain's technology laws
Bahrain continues to be a regional HUB for ICT and technology innovation.
Why is being nosey not a nuisance?
Legal Week, Legal Business, eprivateclient and International Adviser report on the hire of Madalina-Andreea Dumitrescu as a Disputes Partner in London
Madalina-Andreea Dumitrescu has joined the firm as a commercial dispute resolution Partner in London.
Energy crisis sparks questions of liability where hedged prices are not necessarily so.
Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Madalina-Andreea Dumitrescu as new Disputes Partner
The firm announces the appointment of Madalina-Andreea Dumitrescu as a commercial dispute resolution partner in London.
A better alternative just around the block?
Hugh and Guy explain the experiences of startup Fashion on the Block after it inadvertently filed the wrong form with HMRC
Anti-Money Laundering in Switzerland - Quick overview
Swiss anti-money laundering legislation has undergone numerous changes in recent years.