Furlough fraud and other errors in coronavirus support claims: last chance saloon
In recent weeks, HMRC have made clear that they will clamp down hard on abuse of the furlough scheme and other coronavirus support measures. The passing of the Finance Act 2020 last week now gives employers a 90-day window to notify HMRC of any errors (whether deliberate or inadvertent). Businesses should therefore review their furlough claims now to mitigate the risk of an HMRC investigation in future.
The various coronavirus support measures were introduced on a "pay now, check later" basis. It has become clear that the schemes have been abused by some, and HMRC have been keen to send a clear message that fraud will not be tolerated. HMRC will open criminal investigations where they consider it appropriate and their first arrest has already been reported. There is also an online portal for people to report furlough fraud and other such abuse; it can be assumed that any such report will be important evidence in any consequent investigation.
A criminal investigation by HMRC presents serious risks for any business (including potential adverse publicity). In reality, however, it seems likely that criminal investigations will be reserved for a (perhaps significant) minority of particularly serious cases.
Civil enquiries and new HMRC powers
In addition to their criminal powers, HMRC have been given significant new powers to deal with errors in furlough claims as a civil matter. The Finance Act 2020 (which was enacted last week) contains new legislation providing that that where a business has received a furlough payment to which it was not entitled, this will be taxed at a rate of 100% (regardless of whether the original error was deliberate or accidental). This effectively allows wrongly-claimed furlough payments to be recovered as tax through the tax system, subject to HMRC's usual administration, collection and enforcement powers. HMRC will be able to use their formal information powers to compel businesses to provide information about incorrect claims. And in certain circumstances, HMRC will have the power to recover the tax from directors and other office-holders where the company is insolvent.
Importantly, the new legislation places a legal obligation on an employer to notify HMRC of any claims to which it was not entitled. There is a 90-day window for doing this (starting, broadly, from the later of 22 July and the day the furlough payment was made). There is a level of recognition by HMRC that in these extraordinary circumstances, errors may have been made. However, any failure to notify now has serious consequences, particularly where the employer knew at the time of the claim that it was not entitled to it. In such a case, the failure will be treated as "deliberate and concealed" for penalty purposes. This could give rise to a penalty of up to 100% of the amount wrongly claimed (in addition to the liability to repay the amount itself). It may also result in businesses being included on HMRC's publicly-available list of "deliberate tax defaulters".
It is of course acknowledged that businesses have a lot on their plate at present. However, this issue should not be overlooked. The 90-day window is an opportunity for employers to get on the front foot and pre-empt any future HMRC investigation. The clock is ticking however, particularly in light of the serious penalties for non-compliance. All businesses would be advised to review their furlough and other coronavirus support claims as soon as possible. If any errors are identified or suspected, appropriate advice should be taken and if necessary a disclosure should be made to HMRC. A proactive approach to this issue will be of real benefit in the long run.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
LIDW21: A view from London and India - How dispute avoidance can keep construction and infrastructure plans on track
Join us as we discuss the challenges of the possible rise in disputes in the construction and infrastructure sector in India
No “New Look” in the latest landlord challenge to a tenant CVA
Daniel and Hannah look at the impact of the recent New Look CVA judgment
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
The Lawyer, New Law Journal, International Adviser, CDR Magazine and eprivateclient report on the firm's partner promotions
Charles Russell Speechlys promoted five lawyers to partner, effective 1 May 2021.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
ICC 2021 Rules
The ICC has recently updated its rules for arbitration: the new rules entered into force on 1 January 2021 (the “2021 Rules”).
The Lugano convention – the journey continues
The UK’s departure from the European Union has had the effect of leaving the UK outside of the Lugano Convention of 2007.
Adding claimants pre-service and amending outside the limitation period: pitfalls for the unwary
Sonia looks at a recent High Court judgment and its important guidance on the ability of claimants to be added to a claim before service
Joe Edwards, Simon Heatley and Lauren Kelly write for Practical Law on damages-based agreements
Law firms entering damages-based agreements face a catch-22.
Amelia Goodwin and Georgina O'Sullivan write for Pharmacy Business on managing employee performance
Why contractors should prioritise performance management of employees as a regular feature of their business strategy.
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Have your say: MAC call for evidence on Intra-Company Visa Route
The MAC, has launched a call for evidence on the Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) immigration route.
Damages-based agreements: an island of clarity in changing seas
Simon, Joe and Lauren look at a recent judgment which is a welcome island of clarity in the damages-based agreement sea of uncertainty.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Insolvency Legislation in the GCC
The interesting times of the last 14 months were preceded by the interesting times of the financial crisis of 2008/2009.
Guidance where Domestic Abuse alleged
Rhys Novak quoted by Citywealth on the ways companies can combat potential issues of fraud
Is fraud on the rise and should investors be wary?
Bribery & Corruption team successfully act in Italian bribery prosecution