• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Challenges in the supply chain – fight or flight?

Following the Government’s announcement for all non-essential workers to work from home and for pubs, restaurants and non-essential shops to close, thousands of businesses across the UK are now embedded within the ordered lockdown. Some have found creative ways to adapt, but many still feeling the understandable strain. 

Business are not only adapting to a change in working environment (with many having switched to remote working), but many have also been forced to adapt their supply chain to respond to demand and to react to the global disruption affecting their operations. For some, these challenges will only be intensifying as the lockdown continues, but many are now starting to look beyond the lockdown and what life will be like afterwards. Not only must businesses and service providers ensure they can continue to provide the level of service expected of them, they are battling to ensure they ride the current storm and also adapt successfully after COVID-19.

You only need to take one look at the news channels to see it littered with examples of ways business are adapting positively. Of the most high profile, we have seen a consortium of British manufacturers taking part in the Ventilator Challenge UK to deliver a record number of ventilators to the NHS in a short space of time.  We have seen supermarkets, restaurants and pharmacies switching their operations to focus on key products and delivering to the most vulnerable. We have seen gyms and fitness centres providing live workouts, as well as football clubs and players opening their hotel doors to NHS staff. More recently, we have seen a number of well-known consumer brands step up to produce NHS protective equipment. The response to COVID-19 has been described as nothing short of a “wartime effort”.

Whilst workforces are showing their resilience and ability to adapt to a change in working conditions, vulnerabilities in the supply chains both in the UK and globally are nevertheless being exposed as the disruption takes hold and manufacturing outfits are finding their exports restricted, creating difficulties in delivering. The lockdown rules of some countries mean that their imports and exports are restricted, whereas some are continuing, causing inevitable breaks in the supply chains across the globe.

As a result, businesses are undoubtedly finding themselves looking deep into their supply chain and contracts in place to ascertain how they can react, now and going forward. We have considered steps businesses can take to mitigate their position and look forward. As a starting point, businesses should:

  • Review their underlying contracts with suppliers and customers before taking decisions to suspend supplies and cancel orders. Seek legal advice at the earliest opportunity. Some contracts will contain force majeure clauses. The application of the doctrine of frustration is also being brought to the fore.
  • Maintain a dialogue within the supply chain. Talk to suppliers, manufacturers and customers and discuss how they are adapting and how best companies can work together. Relying on force majeure clauses or frustration is rarely straightforward and is fact sensitive, so negotiating a mutually acceptable solution is often preferable.
  • Mitigate losses. Assess alternatives and contingencies in place and how quickly these can be brought into effect and at what cost. As above, communication is crucial.
  • Check insurance in place as to what losses could be recovered and take advice on that.
  • Take advice on potential regulatory issues to ensure ongoing compliance as the manufacturing of products change. This will also ensure standards are maintained and product liability issues are avoided
  • Keep a record of the steps taken to adapt and new (and ever-changing) measures in place. This may prove important in the future, both in the event an insolvent event occurs (in which case directors’ decisions could be scrutinised), but also to assess long-term changes to supply chain operations when businesses return to normal.

Looking beyond COVID-19 and in addition to the above, wider reviews of supply chains are inevitable to ensure resilience going forward. Examples will be:  looking at where issues occurred during the pandemic and look to diversify going forward both at a supplier level and geographically to reduce risk by not putting all of their eggs in one basket and reviewing IT systems to ensure lines of communication with others in the supply chain are resilient.  

Many businesses are likely to find themselves implementing measures taken during the COVID-19 pandemic long-term where they have proven to be successful. Legal advice should be taken to assess the legal impact of those changes and how best they should be implemented. The team here at Charles Russell Speechlys would be happy to discuss any concerns you have, so please do feel free to contact us for more information.

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner and Sophie Rothwell write for Law360 on anti-bias protection

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Providing pro bono support on social housing issues

    Susan Field

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2024

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • Has a new route to recovery opened up for victims of banking payment frauds?

    Katie Bewick

    Insights

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Dawn raids... a new dawn?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • Abu Dhabi’s New Arbitral Centre Unveils its Rules

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Nigeria's challenge to US$11 billion award succeeds in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales

    John Olatunji

    Quick Reads

  • Caring across borders: The UK’s Homes for Ukraine scheme and the global nature of parental responsibility

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Quick Reads

  • An important reminder for employers on World Menopause Day

    Isobel Goodman

    Quick Reads

  • UAE Polishes Federal Arbitration Law

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • What next for HS2?

    Richard Flenley

    Quick Reads

  • Mediation as a pillar of dispute resolution: it’s happening, embrace it

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

    Rory Partridge

    Quick Reads

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Pandora Papers: HMRC nudge taxpayers to come out of their box

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • DIAC Issues First Annual Report

    Georgia Fullarton

    Quick Reads

  • Dispute Resolution: The Case for Mediation

    Marjan Mirrezaei

    Quick Reads

Back to top