Phillips’ patent for GPS enabled fitness tracker loses its way
Garmin has succeeded in largely revoking Phillips’ UK patent in relation to a GPS enabled athletic performance-monitoring device. The decision significantly reduces Garmin’s potential liability for infringing the patent and may help clear the way for others.
In October 2017, Garmin brought a claim in the High Court of England and Wales to invalidate Phillips’ patent for a GPS-based performance monitor. Phillips brought a counter-claim, alleging that 73 of Garmin’s products sold in the UK infringed the claims of the patent. The High Court handed down its decision at the end of January.
Over the past decade, wearable performance monitoring devices, including those that utilise GPS (either directly or via a smartphone) have become a commonplace sight, expanding rapidly from a fairly niche market of professional and amateur athletes. Phillips’ patent was granted, however, back in 1998. It claimed a device featuring a GPS receiver for acquiring position data of an athlete, and means for converting that data into athletic feedback data and presenting it to the athlete. It also claimed various types of product that developed on this key concept – such as a device also having an integrated audio entertainment system and a system for uploading data from the device to a website to allow for the comparison of the performance of different athletes.
Phillips originally argued that its invention was transformative in the field of technology. Undeterred, Garmin was able to point to a number of articles that pre-dated the patent and raised the possibility of using GPS in conjunction with devices for monitoring physical activity. In particular, Garmin referred to an article by Schutz and Chambaz entitled “Could a satellite-based navigation system (GPS) be used to assess the physical activity of individuals on earth?”, which was published in 1997. From this basis, Garmin argued that the inventions claimed in the patent were not new or would have been obvious to people working in the field of wearable technology in 1998.
The Judge largely agreed with Garmin. Although he considered that the “concept may be said to have given rise to a new industry”, he held that most of the claims of the patent related to ideas that were either not new or were obvious at the time the application was filed for the patent. The only claim of the patent that survived was for a GPS enabled device that features an integrated audio entertainment system for listening to music, where the volume of the music is reduced when data concerning performance is presented audibly to the athlete.
This is a feature found in a number of modern fitness trackers, which may still have infringed the patent (unless their manufacturers obtained a licence from Phillips). However, only a small number of the 73 Garmin products concerned were thought to fall within the surviving claim, so Garmin will have substantially reduced its potential liability to Phillips for infringement of the patent.
The judgment also potentially reduces the risk for other manufacturers’ in the field. Phillips’ UK patent expired in 2018, but it could still bring claims for infringement in relation to products sold in the UK prior to that date. Its ability to do so has now been significantly restricted.
The case has established that the core concept of a device featuring a GPS receiver to monitor physical performance is now in the public domain in the UK. However, future innovations in the technology will be capable of protection and, given the value of the market, it would be no surprise if more patent litigation followed.
For more information please contact David Fyfield on +44 (0)20 7203 5200 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
A secret will, for the moment
Caroline Greenwell and Peter Carlyon write for New Law Journal on the issue of companies exaggerating their green credentials
The extent and impact of greenwashing by companies, the reputational damage where they’re caught out and potential regulatory action.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon, Georgina Munnik, Sam Saunders and Simone Sancandi produce the Chambers Global Practice Guide on the enforcement of judgments in Bahrain
Stop, collaborate and listen: Top 10 Tips with Collaboration Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips on collaboration agreements - what should you know?
Phase out of temporary restrictions on use of winding up petitions
Hannah takes a look at the recent UK Government announcement on statutory demands and the presentation of winding up petitions
WHAT NEXT FOR NIGHTCLUBS?
Preparing your company for sale
We set out here some initial steps to consider in anticipation of a sale.
ESG investment and the challenges for trustees
What challenges does the ESG revolution present for trustees of private family trusts?
Charles Russell Speechlys advises discoverIE on its acquisition of Antenova
discoverIE is a leading international designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics to industry.
Q&A: Separate blocks, common parts and enfranchisement
Miriam Seitler and Lauren Fraser answer queries relating to leaseholders seeking to acquire the freehold.
Hugh Gunson quoted by the Daily Express on IR35 tax fines following the news that HMRC was forced to issue tax penalties to several Government departments
HMRC was forced to issue several Government departments with tax penalties in recent months as IR35 failings were unearthed.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon and Haleema Wahid write for The Oath on the rise of litigation
Patrick and Haleema consider some of the litigation funding options available in the UAE, with a particular emphasis on third-party funding.
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
The family court’s role in micro managing 'trivial' disputes
The recent decision has dealt with the family court’s role in micro managing “trivial” disputes in relation to children
Gareth Mills writes for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on technology disputes in Bahrain
The most common disputes occur following perceived or actual failures to deliver required technology services an lack of clarity.
International Arbitration in India and Around the World
Rupa Lakha joined the panel discussing the latest developments in construction and dispute resolution.
Gabrielle Shovlin writes for the Practical Law Dispute Resolution Blog on when witness evidence waives privilege
Be careful what you reference: when witness evidence waives privilege.
Hugh Gunson quoted by Accountancy Age on why HMRC needs to rebuild taxpayers' trust after its Loan Charge failings
"HMRC needs to listen to the criticisms made in relation to its handling of the loan charge and reflect on them to achieve real change."