Extradition in the United Arab Emirates
Extradition, in international law, is the process by which one state (requesting State), upon the request of another (requested State), effects the return of a person for trial for a crime punishable by the laws of the requesting State and committed outside the State of refuge or final convictions. This process must include three parties: the requesting State, the requested State and the person requested for criminal trial or final conviction.
Extradition is governed and subject to two kind of laws: the local laws of both States and the existence of a treaty between the two States.
Extradition in UAE
- The UAE has deployed since 2006 a specific Federal Law known as Federal Law no. 39 of 2006 on Mutual Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters.
- This law permits the UAE authorities only to hear the formal procedures and conditions of the extradition request regardless of the nature of the crime.
- The UAE is a signatory party to the Riyadh Arab Convention on Judicial Co-operation in 1983, which was signed by most other Arab countries including Algeria, Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia.
- The UAE is also a signatory party to many bilateral treaties signed and ratified for judicial co-operation such as agreements with Australia, China, Egypt, France, India, Iran, Pakistan, Spain, the United Kingdom and Republic of Kazakhstan.
- The UAE has set up a judicial mechanism made up of five stages enabling the person requested for extradition to challenge the extradition process as follows:
- The Local Interpol Authorities in the UAE
- The Public Prosecution heading the International Judicial Matters
- The Court of Appeal
- The Cassation Court
- The Ministry of Justice & The Ministry of Interior
- Article 7 of the Federal Law no. 39 of 2006 on Mutual Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters states the conditions that need to be fulfilled in order to qualify for accepting extradition.
- Article 9 of the same law states the legal obstacles that will lead to non-extradition.
Case Study 1: The absence of an extradition treaty.
We advised a client on the legal challenges to resist the extradition process between UAE and Romania, which did not sign an extradition treaty with UAE.
Our client was subject to extradition request based on a final irrevocable conviction by the Highest Court.
In the absence of an extradition treaty, the authorities are bound to apply the local laws which is Federal Law no. 39 of 2006 on Mutual Judicial Co-operation Matters and to respect the important principle of Reciprocity in International Law.
In this specific case, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of our client and declared non-extradition because the European state (Requesting State) did not abide and respect the principle of Reciprocity.
Case study 2: The existence of an extradition treaty.
We also advised a client on the legal challenges to resist the extradition process between UAE and Kazakhstan, with the existence of an extradition treaty with UAE signed and ratified in 2009.
Our client was subject to a warrant arrest issued by the Requesting State in abstention.
This case was a unique one, since there was a detailed extradition treaty that governs the extradition request. The requesting state had sent almost all the required legal documents and information that qualify the UAE authorities to determine extradition.
The UAE authorities by applying the extradition treaty had found that the indictment document was missing and the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of our client for non-extradition because of this legal omission.
What does this mean?
- The UAE has entered into multilateral and bilateral extradition treaties during the last decade.
- The UAE has promulgated a very developed and up to date Federal Law in 2006 taking into consideration international affairs and local laws requirements without any challenges to its sovereignty over its subjects and the expats living in UAE from one side and the cosmopolitan environment UAE has set during the last decade with the high importance on the rule of the law and human rights guarantees secured under this law to the persons requested for extradition.
- The UAE has set a very detailed and staged judicial system specifically to hear and decide extradition requests.
This article was written by Ghassan El Daye. For more information please contact Ghassan on +971 42461903 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
A secret will, for the moment
Caroline Greenwell and Peter Carlyon write for New Law Journal on the issue of companies exaggerating their green credentials
The extent and impact of greenwashing by companies, the reputational damage where they’re caught out and potential regulatory action.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon, Georgina Munnik, Sam Saunders and Simone Sancandi produce the Chambers Global Practice Guide on the enforcement of judgments in Bahrain
Phase out of temporary restrictions on use of winding up petitions
Hannah takes a look at the recent UK Government announcement on statutory demands and the presentation of winding up petitions
WHAT NEXT FOR NIGHTCLUBS?
Hugh Gunson quoted by the Daily Express on IR35 tax fines following the news that HMRC was forced to issue tax penalties to several Government departments
HMRC was forced to issue several Government departments with tax penalties in recent months as IR35 failings were unearthed.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Patrick Gearon and Haleema Wahid write for The Oath on the rise of litigation
Patrick and Haleema consider some of the litigation funding options available in the UAE, with a particular emphasis on third-party funding.
Gareth Mills writes for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on technology disputes in Bahrain
The most common disputes occur following perceived or actual failures to deliver required technology services an lack of clarity.
International Arbitration in India and Around the World
Rupa Lakha joined the panel discussing the latest developments in construction and dispute resolution.
Gabrielle Shovlin writes for the Practical Law Dispute Resolution Blog on when witness evidence waives privilege
Be careful what you reference: when witness evidence waives privilege.
Be careful what you reference: when witness evidence waives privilege
Gabrielle looks at the recent decision in Scipharm Sarl v Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and its impact on privilege
Hugh Gunson quoted by Accountancy Age on why HMRC needs to rebuild taxpayers' trust after its Loan Charge failings
"HMRC needs to listen to the criticisms made in relation to its handling of the loan charge and reflect on them to achieve real change."
Ongoing supply chain crisis looms large over upcoming allergen law change
Ghassan El Daye
Emaratyah, Al Bayan Newspaper and 24.ae publish comments from Ghassan El Daye on the UAE’s new federal law to establish a National Human Rights Institution
Ghassan comments on the latest proposals to establish a National Human Rights Institution.
The Digital Dispute Resolution Rules – How Novel Are They?
Sonia takes an in-depth look at The Digital Dispute Resolution Rules
Ghassan El Daye
Al Bayan Newspaper quote Ghassan El Daye on the move by the UAE’s Federal Public Prosecution to allow the payment of fines through instalments
The UAE Courts have ensured that services are made available to provide alternative and more accessible options.
Paula Boast, Thanos Karvelis, Niel Coertse and Mazin Al Mardhi write for the International Comparative Legal Guide - International Arbitration 2021
The guide covers common issues in international arbitration laws and regulations across 36 jurisdictions.
Mark Hill and Lara Haidar write for The Legal 500 Country Comparative Guide on Intellectual Property in the United Arab Emirates
An overview of the latest intellectual property laws and regulations applicable in United Arab Emirates.
Mark Hill writes for In-House Community Magazine on solutions templating, a new priority for in-house legal teams
Removing the burden from legal teams, contract managers and administrators.
Scope of an adviser’s duty of care: a purposive approach
The Supreme Court provides guidance on determining the scope of a defendant adviser’s duty of care.