Coastal Work Comes at a Cost
The Kingdom of Bahrain first considered a proposal aimed at imposing levies on companies dredging sand from its coastline a number of years ago, with the Shura Council approving a draft law in this respect during early 2013.
Whilst the levies will, of course, provide the government with a further source of income, this is not the only intention behind the imposition of these charges: these levies will also work to limit the number of companies dredging from Bahrain’s coasts and, in doing so, will preserve and protect its natural resources.
Initially the legislation governing dredging, and the fact that levies would be applied for doing so, was published in the Official Gazette during August 2014. The legislation governing the regulation of dredging and sale of sea sand operations (Law No. 37 of 2014) subsequently came into force on 7th September 2014 (the “Legislation”).
The Legislation did not, however, provide any information in respect of the fees that would be applicable and it was not until February 2016 that these were published (Regulation No. 29 of 2016) (the “Regulation”). The Regulation defined the fees applicable to dredging as 500 fils per cubic metre.
With the significant interval between the issuance of the Legislation and the Regulation, some businesses are now facing complications regarding the levies that should have been paid during this 18 month period.
Companies subject to the Legislation have been paying fees in the intervening period however these amounts are not necessarily equivalent to the charges provided for in the Regulation.
The main question now is whether charges under the Regulation can and will be backdated and, if so, will the relevant authorities be issuing credit notes for any overpayments made and further invoices to recoup monies where underpayments have been made?
There have also been some discussions as to whether charges are likely to be backdated to when companies were initially granted their dredging permits. Having said this, it is worth noting that the notion of retrospective implementation of these charges is not provided for in the Legislation.
Regardless of the monetary aspect, it is certainly comforting that laws limiting the ungoverned use of natural resources are now not only being rolled out across Bahrain but are also being put into effect with companies carrying out these activities being formally regulated.
This article was first published by Lexis Nexis in the MENA Business Law Review in the 1st quarter of 2017.
This article was written by Georgina Munnik. For more information please contact Georgina on +97317133205 or at firstname.lastname@example.org
News & Insights
How to ‘Insure’ Victory – Bringing Claims Against Insurers with Insolvency Exclusions
Heidi Wagstaff and Rachel Bardell examine a recent judgement and its effect on bringing claims against insurers with insolvency exclusions.
“I didn’t see it, but can I still say it?” – witness statements from office holders
Office holders involved in litigation often face difficulties in giving evidence in the claims which they pursue.
Deeds of assignment – what claims are you really buying?
A recent judgment re-iterates the importance of carefully drafting a deed of assignment when assigning claims.
New Zealand Courts find that the Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution IS a Court
Georgina Munnik discusses the decision in New Zealand which ruled that the BCDR's judgments are internationally enforceable.