Intellectual Property update: COVID-19
The coronavirus outbreak has brought huge challenges globally to both individuals and businesses. Whilst businesses carry on as best they can in these difficult times, there are different strategies being deployed by intellectual property offices for dealing with deadlines including:
UKIPO – requests for extensions of time will be considered “as favourably as possible on a case-by-case basis” and where national and international legislation allows.
EUIPO – all deadlines falling between 9 March and 30 April before the EUIPO have automatically been extended until 1 May 2020. As this is not a working day, deadlines effectively roll to 4 May 2020. This does not apply to deadlines to further appeal Board of Appeal decisions to the General Court, which remain as originally set.
WIPO – deadlines remain as originally set but there are steps that can be taken if deadlines are missed. Evidence for the reason why the deadline was missed may be required.
Other national offices in the EU have varying procedures. In relation to courts, in England, along with both the General Court and Court of Justice of the EU, the deadlines currently remain as set.
Trade mark applications
The pandemic has already spurred a number of filings for trade marks related to COVID-19.
Looking at the digital healthcare industry, Nepesmo Ltd has applied to register the word ‘RemoteCovid’ as a trade mark in the UK. Nepesmo is a company that uses AI-driven self-monitoring to predict and prevent lung attacks. Information about what exactly RemoteCovid may be is not publicly available yet, but Nepesmo’s products use technology such as mobile apps and internet portals to permit patients and their clinicians to monitor their health conditions. Coronavirus is a respiratory disease which would therefore be considered as a lung attack, which may be why it is being considered by Nepesmo. The application was published on 16 March 2020 and the window to oppose it closes on 16 June 2020.
Elsewhere, a sole trader based in Italy, Francesco Pratesi, perhaps in an optimistic spirit, has registered the word ‘COVID-19 SURVIVOR’ in the Benelux. Mr Pratesi supplies retailers in Italy, Europe and the Far East and has registered the mark in Class 25 which covers baseball hats, beanie hats, skiing hats, fashion hats, t-shirts and messages on t-shirts, suggesting that once the virus has passed he hopes to put the mark on clothing products which proud COVID-19 survivors will be able to wear. Although the mark has been registered, the window to oppose it remains open until 25 April 2020 and appears to have already survived one unsuccessful attempt to oppose it.
It goes without saying that these are unprecedented and strange times. However, we are continuing our business as usual, and if you or your business have any intellectual property needs or queries, our team are on hand to assist.
You can find out more on this by listening to our podcast here.
Charlotte Duly writes for the Trademark Lawyer Magazine on the legal issues that tribute bands face when selecting a name
Picking a name for a tribute act that makes it clear what they offer whilst avoiding issues with the actual band can be a challenge.
Brexit and Intellectual Property: one month on
Charlotte looks at the impact of Brexit on intellectual property one month on
The Tricky Issue of Joint Authorship in Copyright Works
Where more than one person creates a work, it can be deemed ‘joint authorship’ and each has the same rights as a sole author would.
We’re not all going on a summer holiday – what are the implications for all those unused trade mark registrations?
IP in a Pod: Social Media
What IP issues surround the use and protection of hashtags, memes, GIFs and stickers?
Influencer Agreements: Six points that a business should consider
Due to the commercial power that influencers have over their followers, businesses are increasingly looking to secure their services.
MP’s to Investigate the ‘Economic Impact’ of Music Streaming
The DCMS announced that an inquiry is to be launched into the economics of the music streaming industry.
Q&A examining information notices and the right to manage
Can section 82 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 enable an RTM company to serve an information notice on a third party?
Copyright Infringement – Link Available Here
If you reproduce someone else’s work in the form of a link, you could fall foul of copyright law.
Burger King, Stevenage and my FIFA confusion
Trade Mark success for the gymnastics National Governing Body
In a recent case, it was found that UK trade marks for "British Gymnastics, More than a sport" were infringed.
Nick White writes for MCA on the data issues surrounding the rise of popularityy of
The conception of a drinks brand - innovation and IP
Nick White quoted in International Adviser on the scope for musical royalties to be the latest investment craze
David Fyfield writes for Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review on the Supreme Court's ruling in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd
IP in a Pod: Designs and design rights - part 2 (UK rights)
The second part of our two-part episode on designs and design rights.
IP in a Pod: Designs and design rights – part 1 (EU rights)
David, Pete and Rahim discuss registered and unregistered design rights in the European Union.
US Court 'swipes left' on dating app dispute
Captain Tom Moore – a positive pandemic trade mark story
Recent applications for various “Tom Moore” marks have been a welcome reminder of the positive stories that emerged from lockdown.