Brexit: Implications for Intellectual Property
The UK left the European Union (EU) at 11 PM on 31st January 2020. At this point, we entered a transition period which effectively meant business as usual for IP matters during the course of 2020. The transition period ended at 11PM on 31st December 2020. Mechanisms have been put in place to ensure that IP rights continue to be protected going forward. Trade marks and designs are the IP rights most affected, but there is an impact on other IP rights as well.
Trade Marks - Significant Impact post Brexit
The UK is no longer automatically covered by EU trade marks. All EU trade mark registrations existing at the end of the transition period were automatically mirrored to become comparable UK national registrations. Therefore, if you owned 10 EU trade mark registrations at the end of the transition period, on the day after you owned 10 comparable UK trade mark registrations and 10 EUTM registrations covering the remaining 27 member states of the EU. The UK registrations retain the original filing, priority and UK seniority dates and the first renewal dates will be the same as the original EU registration (although if an EUTM is due for renewal after 31st December 2020, and was renewed early during the transition period, the comparable UK registration will need to be renewed separately). The creation of the comparable UK trade mark registration was carried out free of charge. The new UK trade mark registration will not initially be liable to revocation for non-use on the ground that the corresponding EU trade mark has not been put to genuine use in the UK (use in the EU prior to the end of the transition period will count as use of the comparable UK right). Comparable UK marks also benefit from reputation acquired in the EU before the end of the transition period (but this will diminish over time). Licences and security interest are generally deemed to apply to the comparable UK mark but did not appear on the UK register automatically.
International registrations designating the EU that were protected before the end of the transition period also continue to be protected in the UK as a comparable mark. However, this registration exists separately to the International Registration that it stems from.
Pending EU trade mark applications were not mirrored automatically and will need to be refiled within a period of 9 months from the end of the transition period in order to apply for a comparable UK trade mark retaining the filing, priority and UK seniority dates of the pending EUTM. The usual UK fees will be required. The same will apply for International Registrations that were not yet protected at the end of the transition period.
New EUTM filings do not extend to the UK (they are limited to the remaining 27 EU member states). Trade mark owners need to seek national protection in the UK for their trade marks. Application through the Madrid Protocol is still be available for International Registrations designating the UK.
The UK court system no longer has EU trade mark courts. EU trade mark owners are not able to enforce them in the UK and obtain pan-EU injunctions under the EUTM Regulation. UK courts continue to accept jurisdiction over proceedings ongoing at the end of the transition period relating to EUTMs and continue to apply the provisions of the EUTM Regulation to such proceedings. However, it appears that remedies may only apply to the comparable UK mark as there is some uncertainty as to whether such orders should have any effect in the EU. UK Courts, of course, continue to have jurisdiction over infringement of UK trade marks.
The UK Government has stated that where an injunction in place at 1 January 2021 prohibits actions in the UK which would infringe an existing EUTM, the terms of that injunction are to be treated as if they also apply to the comparable UK trade mark (subject to an order of a court to the contrary). Pan-EU injunctions issued by UK courts (sitting as EU Courts) prior to the end of the transition period should also be recognised (but may also be subject to contrary orders of an EU court).
UK trade mark laws may develop independently over time and diverge from EU trade mark laws. Future CJEU decisions are no longer binding but are likely to be persuasive.
Designs – Significant Impact post Brexit
Existing Registered Community Designs (“RCDs”) were also mirrored in the same way as EU trade mark registrations to become re-registered designs, but again pending applications will need to be refiled. Designers need to seek national protection in the UK for designs in addition to RCD protection in the EU. Cloning rights were also provided for in relation to existing Unregistered Community Design Rights (“UCDRs”) which will continue to be protected for the remainder of their three year term as continuing unregistered designs.
The UK government has now ratified the Hague Agreement which means that design owners can take advantage of the centralised process for international design registration.
Prior to 1 January 2021, UK unregistered design right did not provide the same protection as UCDR e.g. surface decoration was not covered. However, from 1 January 2021, a supplementary unregistered design is also available which confers similar protection to the UCDR but for the UK only. This is significant for short life designs, e.g. fashion, where the informal three year protection without registration provides valuable temporary protection from copying. First disclosure needs to take place in the UK and not the EU in order for UK protection to arise. Similarly first disclosure in the UK will not lead to protection as an UCDR. Complexities may well arise as to whether first disclosure in another jurisdiction has destroyed novelty.
Patents – Potential Significant Impact on Unified Patent Court and Unitary European Patent Regime post Brexit
Current European Patent Regime: It is important to note that the UK’s exit from the EU has not affected the current European Patent system, which is governed by the European Patent Convention. Businesses can continue to apply to the European Patent Office for patent protection which includes the UK. Existing European Patents covering the UK are also unaffected and European patent attorneys based in the UK will continue to be able to represent applicants before the EPO.
Supplementary Protection Certificates: SPCs can continue to be applied for through the UKIPO.
Unified Patent Court / Unitary European Patent:The UK Government has confirmed its withdrawal from the Unified Patent Court system. Whether the project will go ahead without the UK remains to be seen.
Other IP – Lower Impact post Brexit
Copyright: No significant changes as copyright law is largely national (although based on several EU directives and regulations). There will be an impact on some cross border issues.
Databases: Sui generis database right was implemented in the UK by regulation but qualification for database right was by reference to membership of the EEA. The UK and the EU have agreed that the holder of a database right in respect of the UK which arose before the end of the transition period shall maintain an enforceable right affording the same level of protection and for an equivalent remaining term. UK legislation has been amended so that only UK citizens, residents, and businesses are eligible for database rights in the UK for databases created on or after 1 January 2021.
eu domains: UK registrants are unable to register new .eu domains as from 1 January 2021. Existing domains were withdrawn (and after 12 months will be revoked) unless UK registrants updated their registration data before 31 December 2020 to indicate a legally established entity in the EU or updated their residence to an EU member state. Pan UK/ EU business are therefore still able to register .eu domains though an EU based subsidiary.
Portfolio management: Review filing / brand protection strategies. EUTMs no longer cover the UK and therefore consider filing UK national applications in addition to EUTMs. Consider potential non - use of EUTMs (although use in the UK prior to 1 January 2021 will be taken into account, the significance of that use will progressively decrease). Also, be aware that evidence relating to the UK will no longer contribute to the protection of an EUTM, for example proving reputation, as from 1 January 2021 even if that evidence predates 1 January 2021 as the EUTM must be reputed in the EU at the moment the decision is taken. Consider the need to file EUTMs if the need for future protection in the EU is anticipated. Opting out of owning a comparable UK right is also an option that may need to be considered in certain circumstances.
Representation: The Withdrawal Agreement ensures that UK legal representatives can continue to represent their clients before the EUIPO in cases that were ongoing at the end of the transition period.
It continues to be business as usual for Charles Russell Speechlys as we will conduct our EU trade mark work with the assistance of our colleagues in our Luxembourg office. Your IP matters will continue to be strategically managed by your existing contacts.
In respect of any new proceedings before the UKIPO, from 1 January 2021 an address for service in the UK, Gibraltar or the Channel Islands is required.
Enforcement: Consider your litigation strategy to obtain the most effective remedies in the long term. Anti-counterfeiting programmes may also need to be reviewed, particularly the filing of customs notifications in the EU and UK.
Commercial agreements: Consider the potential impact of various clauses such as territory, force majeure, material adverse change, governing law and jurisdiction. Any references to EU legislation will need to be considered.
Exhaustion: IP rights in goods placed on the UK market by, or with the consent of the right holder may no longer be considered exhausted in the EEA so permission may be needed from the right holder. In the short term, IP rights in goods placed on the EEA market by, or with the consent of the right holder after the transition period continue to be considered exhausted in the UK. There will be a consultation in the early part of 2021 on the UK’s long term position on exhaustion.
IP and transactions: Consider the impact on due diligence, licences, assignments and security over IP. Consider the need to record existing licences and security interests against comparable UK trade marks.
Charity Training: Digital Transformation in the Charity Sector
We would be delighted if you could join us for the second session in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
Charity Training: Brand Protection
We would be delighted if you could join us for the first in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Practicalities in Cladding Claims
Insight into Issues with Cladding Claims
EWS1 Forms - the latest episode
RICS have now published their highly anticipated guidance on when EWS1 forms will be required.
Q&A: Am I insured for COVID-19?
Laura Bushaway writes for Estates Gazette on a recent claim under the “disease clause” of business interruption policy.
The Purpose Podcast: Corporate purpose
Simon Ridpath discusses corporate purpose and the rise of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in “The Purpose Podcast”
Client alert: Construction under competition law spotlight
We outline the three investigations which have either recently concluded or are ongoing together with what this means for businesses.
Looking beyond the benefitted land: confirmation that an objector’s wider property may be considered in applications to discharge/modify restrictive covenants
Read our recent case study on applicants who were prevented from developing a new house due to a restrictive covenant covering their land.
Further extension of coronavirus restrictions affecting residential properties: Where are we now?
The extension will be implemented from and including 31 March 2021 by the Coronavirus Act 2020.
Knight Frank Wealth Report: The Global Perspective on Prime Property & Investment
Knight Frank partners joined Charles Russell Speechlys for a virtual panel-led discussion on the Knight Frank Wealth Report
Case Study: One Blackfriars Limited
An informative and positive judgment for administrators selling high-value property in distressed and complex scenarios.
Keeping Up With Construction: Handover at Practical Completion - Practical Pointers
Practical tips for the handover of a successful project.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on Trident Royalties’ US$28m Placing
Trident Royalties plc is a growth-focused mining royalty and streaming company.
Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 30 June 2021
As the restrictions are extended, read what it means for you here.
Commercial rent arrears: what are the latest restrictions on landlords’ remedies this quarter day?
What you need to know for this Quarter Day.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Avation plc on £7.5m secondary placing
Headquartered in Singapore, Avation plc manages a fleet of aircraft which it leases to airlines across the world.
To Promote or not to Promote, that is the Option: Top 10 Tips with Promotion Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips with promotion agreements - what should you know?
Sleep-in workers not entitled to NMW for entire shift
A unanimous ruling by The Supreme Court in the Royal Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake and another case.
Brexit and intellectual property: Gibraltar, the Isle of Man and
Charlotte looks at where else trade mark and design protection may be required following Brexit.