• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Luxembourg Client briefing: Circular CSSF 21/789 – Fund manager self-assessment, management letter, separate audit report

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) has issued Circular CSSF 21/789[1] (the Circular) which concerns - with only few exceptions - all Luxembourg authorised investment fund managers[2] (IFMs or the Addressees). The Circular introduces three new supervisory tools that apply for financial years ending on or after 31 December 2021. They are described hereafter.

  • A self-assessment questionnaire: Addressees have to submit a self-assessment questionnaire form (SAQ) to the CSSF for each financial year. The first submission of the SAQ is due within 6 months after the end of the Addressee’s financial year. The following submissions are due within 4 months after the end of the Addressee’s financial year.
  • A separate audit report: The Luxembourg authorised auditor of an Addressee (réviseur d’entreprises agréé – REA) has to issue a separate report to the Addressee (rapport distinct - the Separate Report) to verify the Addressee’s replies to the SAQ. The Addressee must transmit the Separate Report to the CSSF within 7 months after the end of the Addressee’s Financial Year. However, for the first Separate Report, the REA has 9 months after the end of the Addressee’s financial year to issue the Separate Report.
  • A management letter: The REA of the Addressees must produce a management letter (lettre de recommendations – Management Letter) or a confirmation that the REA has no comments (the No Comment ML). The Addressees must transmit the Management Letter with their comments (or the No Comment ML) to the CSSF within 7 months from the end of their financial year.

If an Addressee’s CSSF authorisation ends, the deadlines for submission of the SAQ and the Separate Report and the Management Letter (or the No Comment ML) apply from the date of the end of authorisation.

More about the SAQ

The content of the SAQ depends on the scope of licence of the Addressee. The Addressees shall self-assess their compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements applying to them. The SAQ contains no questions on AML/CFT. This topic is covered inter alia via Circular CSSF 21/788.

The SAQ must only be submitted after it has been reviewed and validated by the responsible persons of the Addressee[3] (the Responsible Persons). Accordingly, the Responsible Persons shall establish adequate processes within the Addressee to make sure that they receive all necessary information to respond to the SAQ in due time.

More about the Management Letter

The Management Letter form is made available to the REA by the CSSF via eDesk. The Circular requires that the Management Letter must take into account, at least, the following (the Findings):

“- an important weakness or a point needing improvement communicated to whom it concerns in accordance with:

  • ISA 260 “Communication with those charged with governance”;
  • ISA 265 “Communicating deficiencies in internal control to those charged with governance and management”;

- any other weakness or point needing improvement which, based on the professional judgement of the REA, is of sufficient importance to be brought to the attention of the IFM’s responsible persons or the CSSF.”

The Management Letter must also follow up on any Findings of previous financial years that have not been closed. The Responsible Persons must comment on any Findings and include in particular:

“- a detailed explanation of the reasons and circumstances related to the occurrence of the weakness or point needing improvement raised by the REA; - a detailed explanation of the measures taken or decided in order to remedy the weakness or point needing improvement and to prevent their recurrence in the future. These measures must be accompanied by a detailed remediation plan and a related timetable”.

If the Responsible Persons do not respond to the REA and/or do not take remedial action in relation to Findings in a timely manner, the REA shall mention in the Management Letter that the REA did not receive comments on the Findings from the Responsible Persons.

More about the Separate Report

The REA must fill in the Separate Report via eDesk. To verify the Addressees’ responses to the SAQ, the CSSF has defined a series of procedures in the Separate Report that must be completed by the REA. The results of the procedures are answers to “mainly closed-ended questions and they do not entail an opinion” in accordance with auditing or other standards.

Miscellaneous

The Circular reminds that general requirements about filings via the CSSF’s eDesk portal are set out in Circular CSSF 19/721 and that a general user guide is available to Addressees and REA on the eDesk portal.

Procedures and explanations on preparing the SAQ, the Separate Report and the Management Letter are provided on the CSSF’s eDesk portal under the heading “Investment funds and vehicles / Investment fund managers” in the “Collective Investment Sector Reporting Tool” box.

 

[1] Circular CSSF 21/789 of 17 December 2021 - Practical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted annually by investment fund managers. Engagement of the réviseurs d'entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors) of investment fund managers and practical rules concerning the management letter and the separate report to be drawn up annually
[2] The Circular contains a list of the enitities in scope. This list includes all investment fund managers as defined in Circular CSSF 18/698, except management companies authorised according to article 125-1 of the law of 17 December 2010 on undertakings for collective investment (the 2010 Law) and management companies authorised in accordance with chapter 18 of the 2010 Law.
[3] Responsible persons means 1) the management body (“organe de direction”) under Article 1(26) of the 2010 Law, 2) the governing body (“organe directeur”) under Article 1(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013 of 19 December 2012 supplementing Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to exemptions, general operating conditions, depositaries, leverage, transparency and supervision and 3) senior management (“instances dirigeantes”) as defined in part I of Circular CSSF 18/698.

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Give Back Beauty Group in the acquisition of INCC Parfums

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2024

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • France: Employment and Labour Law Comparative Guide

    Kim Campion

    Insights

  • Daniel Sullivan writes for Law360 on hundreds of 'rogue filings' being lodged via Companies House and advice for affected banks

    Daniel Sullivan

    In the Press

  • Why Switzerland is poised to become a prime jurisdiction for families to establish their private trust companies

    Dharshi Wijetunga

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • The role of national courts in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • There is a new tax law in town – but it’s probably not what you think

    Sarah Kadhum

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Vitro on a major international restructuring project

    David Cordova Flores

    News

  • Digital assets consultation by the Law Commission

    Cheryl Tham

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys continues to grow its Financial Services Regulation & Funds offering with the appointment of Jeremy Bell

    William Garner

    News

  • FT Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on industry pushback to FCA plans to name firms under investigation

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Charlie Ring and Ross Youngs write for FT Adviser on where wealth managers should look to for their own financial advice

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

  • Take-aways for UK firms from ESMA’s consultation on reverse solicitation

    Cheryl Tham

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Paris significantly strengthens litigation practice with notable team hire led by Frédéric Dereux

    Frédéric Dereux

    News

  • FCA Authorisation: Do I need to be FCA-regulated?

    Richard Ellis

    Insights

  • City AM quotes William Garner on FCA plans to 'name and shame' firms under investigation

    William Garner

    In the Press

  • Sifted quotes Victoria Younghusband on a boardroom disagreement involving Klarna and Sequoia Capital

    Victoria Younghusband

    In the Press

  • Consumer Duty - FCA warns that some firms are “lagging behind”

    Richard Ellis

    Insights

  • Les entreprises en difficulté ou en croissance peuvent-elle se passer des equity lines? Can distressed or growth companies do without hybrid bonds?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • UAE Polishes Federal Arbitration Law

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Is the opening up of Nexity's services division capital a consequence of the difficulties facing the French property sector?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration publishes new Arbitration Rules

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • FCA warns asset managers against greenwashing

    Quick Reads

  • Sustainability disclosure requirements: Time is short to comment on FCA's proposals

    Quick Reads

  • FSRA Ramps up Enforcement Action with Fines and a Prohibition Order

    Quick Reads

  • Ten Years Since The 2012 Saudi Arbitration Law: Where Are We Now?

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Donoghue v Stevenson: 90 years on from a snail and a bottle of ginger beer

    Joe Edwards

    Quick Reads

  • Sberbank CIB enters special administration as worldwide sanctions take their grip on London branches of Russian banks

    Jessica Williams

    Quick Reads

  • How to tackle a large Gender Pay Gap

    Emily Chalkley

    Quick Reads

  • The importance of being earnest: file your proof of debt on time

    Jessica Williams

    Quick Reads

  • LPAs – a welcome change for the better

    Natalie Butler

    Quick Reads

  • PRA to further scrutinise cloud computing in 2022

    Mark Bailey

    Quick Reads

Back to top