Financial Conduct Authority consults on increasing the award for the Financial Ombudsman Service
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is consulting on increasing the award limit for the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). The relevant Consultation Paper (CP 18/31) closes for comment on 21 December 2018.
At present, the FOS can require FCA authorised firms to pay awards of up to £150,000 to eligible complainants. It is possible for the FOS to recommend that a firm pays a larger amount, but it is not compulsory for firms to do so.
The FCA’s view is that the £150,000 award is no longer adequate, and the proposal is to increase the award to £350,000 for new complaints. Note however that the new £350,000 limit would apply to complaints about firms’ acts or omissions that happen on or after 1 April 2019.
For new complaints that relate to acts or omissions that took place prior to 1 April 2019, the proposal is to increase the current limit to £160,000. For any complaints referred to the ombudsman before 1 April 2019, the limit will remain at £150,000.
There is also a proposal that from 1 April 2020 onwards, both award limits are automatically adjusted on 1 April each year to make an adjustment for inflation.
The proposal sits alongside a policy statement with near-final rules on extending access to the FOS to a larger category of small and medium-sized enterprises.
The proposals will certainly be welcomed by eligible complainants with high value complaints as a genuine alternative to court proceedings due to the larger potential award. However, it may be disappointing to some that the larger award only relates to business taking place from 1 April 2019. That being said, it is likely that the proposals could lead to an increased number of high value (and potentially more complicated) claims coming through the FOS. One of the concerns with complaining through the FOS at present is that the process can be time-consuming, with long delays while the FOS assesses each stage of the complaint. Further, on occasion the FOS will dismiss a complicated complaint, confirming that it may be better dealt with through the courts. It is hoped that the FOS will be able to address these issues before the proposals come into existence in order to make the FOS a genuine alternative to court proceedings for high value complaints.
For more information please contact Jessica Arrol on +44 (0)20 7427 6709 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Stop, collaborate and listen: Top 10 Tips with Collaboration Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips on collaboration agreements - what should you know?
Preparing your company for sale
We set out here some initial steps to consider in anticipation of a sale.
ESG investment and the challenges for trustees
What challenges does the ESG revolution present for trustees of private family trusts?
The impact of COVID-19 on commercial and residential tenancies
What impact has COVID-19 had on commercial and residential tenancies? Read more here.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises discoverIE on its acquisition of Antenova
discoverIE is a leading international designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics to industry.
Q&A: Separate blocks, common parts and enfranchisement
Miriam Seitler and Lauren Fraser answer queries relating to leaseholders seeking to acquire the freehold.
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
The family court’s role in micro managing 'trivial' disputes
The recent decision has dealt with the family court’s role in micro managing “trivial” disputes in relation to children
Taxing horizons and fiscal black holes
A super-massive black hole at the centre of the nation’s finances means that tax reform and rates rises look increasingly likely.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Acora on acquisition of Westgate IT
Westgate IT specialises in providing IT support to businesses in the South West.
Q&A: Wrestling with restrictive covenants
Camilla Lamont (barrister at Landmark Chambers) and Real Estate Disputes Partner Emma Humphreys answer a pair of covenant queries
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Grape Paradise on the acquisition of a fine wine business
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised Grape Paradise on the acquisition of the Sarment Group in the China Mainland territories.
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
Jessica Arrol Caws
Good news for offshore private banks: the overseas persons exclusion is here to stay
Collateral Warranties – Are they also a ‘Construction Contract’?
What are collateral warranties and what do they mean for your construction contracts? Read more here.
Succession Planning for Landed Estates
The first in our series of articles on succession planning for landed estates covering a wide variety of matters.
The Digital Dispute Resolution Rules – How Novel Are They?
Sonia takes an in-depth look at The Digital Dispute Resolution Rules
The Business Magazine, Insider Media, Business South and The Surrey Chambers of Commerce report on the firm's involvement in Appital's £2.5m growth capital investment
The injection will accelerate the development of Appital’s technology infrastructure, integration with financial institutions.