Non-dom reforms - what can you do now?
In his Budget speech in July 2015 the Chancellor announced the abolition of “permanent” nondomiciled status with effect from 6 April 2017. Almost a year later, we are still waiting for the details.
With the EU referendum absorbing the Treasury’s attention, it seems unlikely that there will be any certainty regarding the changes to the regime for nondomiciliaries until the autumn, leaving clients and their advisers with little time to act before the regime comes into force. In this article we consider some key issues which advisers can start to discuss with their clients so that they will be ready to take any necessary steps as soon as the position becomes clearer.
- Non-domiciled individuals who are resident in the UK for at least 15 out of the preceding 20 tax years will be deemed to be domiciled in the UK for all tax purposes (income tax, capital gains tax and inheritance tax) from the start of the sixteenth year. This means that they will pay UK income tax and capital gains tax on their worldwide income and gains as they arise and inheritance tax on worldwide assets.
- Stricter rules will apply to individuals who were born in the UK and have a UK domicile of origin. They will be deemed to be domiciled in the UK if UK resident (possibly with a grace period for those returning to work in the UK temporarily, but this is yet to be confirmed).
- Trusts will have a privileged status. The assets of trusts settled by a nondomiciled individual before the individual became deemed domiciled will remain ring-fenced from income tax, capital gains tax and inheritance tax. The individual will be liable to tax on receipt of “benefits” from the trust although it is not known how the benefits regime will operate.
- Some form of capital gains tax “rebasing” will be available for individuals who will be deemed domiciled on 6 April 2017, such that only the post 6 April element of any gain will be taxable. It is not known if the remittance basis will still apply to the pre 6 April element of the gain.
Once the details of the new regime are known, the period before 6 April 2017 is going to be extremely busy for nondomiciled clients and their advisers. Any preparatory work that can be undertaken now is likely to pay off in ensuring that clients have sufficient time to restructure their affairs. Despite the uncertainty surrounding some of the details, we have enough information to know that advisers will need to focus on the following areas:
Start the process of identifying where new “post 6 April 2017” accounts will be required for current remittance basis users who will become deemed domiciled under the new regime. Post 6 April 2017 income accounts should receive the income generated by existing accounts because that income will be taxable on an arising basis and so will not be subject to further tax if remitted.
Pre 6 April 2017 income, on the other hand, will remain taxable if remitted so the post 6 April 2017 income should be used in priority for UK expenditure. It will also be advisable to open separate post 6 April 2017 capital gains accounts to receive the proceeds of post 6 April 2017 disposals, where the assets were originally acquired with pre 6 April 2017 untaxed income and gains. Unfortunately clients who already have a multiplicity of accounts will face further complication.
Start considering how the new regime will affect the client’s investment strategy. For example, restrictions on investing in UK situs assets may need to remain in place if the investments are made using pre 6 April 2017 income and gains which would be taxable if remitted. Restrictions on investing in UK assets may however be lifted for investments made from “clean capital”, which will include post 6 April 2017 income. If a client has been investing in non-reporting funds (which give rise to gains taxed at income tax rates), consider whether there should be a switch to reporting funds after 6 April.
Capital gains position
Review assets standing at a gain and at a loss. Depending on how the capital gains tax rebasing operates, it may be that it is preferable to “manually” rebase assets – for example, by selling them, or by making a gift – before 6 April 2017 rather than relying on automatic rebasing. If clients have an accurate picture of their overall capital gains tax position then they will be better placed to act once the details are known.
For clients who are not yet deemed domiciled for inheritance tax purposes, consider which assets might be suitable to transfer into trust. Transferring liquid assets into trust should be relatively straightforward but more preparatory work may be required in relation to investments with transfer restrictions, or real estate. Trust planning can also be more complicated where the settlor or beneficiaries have connections to the US and certain other jurisdictions, in which case it will be advisable to start planning
Tax efficient structures
For clients who are already deemed domiciled for inheritance tax purposes and so limited in their ability to create trusts, start to consider alternative structures which could reduce the client’s worldwide liability to tax. These include holding assets in an offshore insurance bond, or through a UK company which will pay corporation tax.
Clients with a UK origin
Identify clients born in the UK with a UK domicile of origin who currently claim to be non-domiciled, and review any structures established by them. It will be particularly important to analyse the implications of the new regime for any trust structures and to consider whether the client should be excluded from benefit, or the structure collapsed, before the new regime comes into force.
Some clients will consider ceasing to be UK resident. Others may remain UK resident for general purposes but claim residence elsewhere for the purpose of a double tax treaty. It will be important to review well in advance of 6 April what steps the client will need to take to break residency. The statutory residence test should provide certainty as to a client’s residency status but the rules are extremely complex.
This article was written by Lisa-Jane Dupernex. For more information please get in touch via firstname.lastname@example.org or +44 (0)20 7427 6733.
News & Insights
Victory for Veuve Clicquot in dispute over its distinctive orange labels
Corks were surely popping at the HQ of MHCS after the Court's decision that Veuve Clicquot's labels had been infringed.
Financing arrangements: the impact of COVID-19 for borrowers
Considering the short and longer term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on financing arrangements.