• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Succession of a married person: who gets what?

Matrimonial regimes are liquidated on three occasions: divorce, modification of the matrimonial regime and death. Regarding the latter case, many are not aware that the spouses’ matrimonial regime is liquidated before proceeding with succession which has a significant impact on the assets entering the deceased’s estate.

Acquired vs. Individual property

Swiss law distinguishes between ‘acquired property’ (acquêts; Errungenschaft) and ‘individual/personal property’ (biens propres; Eigengut). Acquired property are assets acquired during the marriage for valuable consideration, such as salaries. Personal assets include those accumulated before the marriage or inherited (before or during marriage).

Implication of the matrimonial regime on the succession

If the deceased was married, and depending on the applicable matrimonial regime, his/her spouse will receive (i) part of the assets in the context of the liquidation of the matrimonial regime, and (ii) part of the assets in the succession.

Acquired property regime (participation aux acquêts; Errungenschaftsbeteiligung): this is the de facto regime for spouses domiciled in Switzerland. Upon divorce or death, the assets acquired during the marriage are shared in half.

By entering into a marriage contract, spouses can choose to adopt one of two other available matrimonial regimes: community of property or separation of property.

A marriage contract can be entered into before or after the marriage was celebrated, effectively at any time (but within the limits of the law). A matrimonial property agreement must be made in the form of a deed.

Community of property regime (communauté de biens; Gütergemeinschaft): in the event of a divorce or death, spouses share all their property, whether personal or acquired during their marriage. In practice, this regime is fairly uncommon – less than 1% of couples are married under this regime.

Separation of property regime (séparation de biens; Gütertrennung): each spouse keeps his/her property separate, i.e. retains ownership, management and use of his/her own assets. In the event of divorce or death, each spouse takes back his/her assets.

The matrimonial regime chosen by the parties therefore has a significant impact on the assets entering the estate.

As a general rule: if the community of property regime greatly favours the surviving spouse, the separation of property regime favours the deceased’s other heirs (such as his/her children).

By way of example: A and B were married and had two common children. A dies. Assume that A did not make any testamentary dispositions, and half the estate is left to the surviving spouse B. See graphics for the implications in the three different matrimonial regimes here.

Acquired property regime

acquired_property_Infographic.jpg

 

Community of property regime

community_of_property_Infographic.jpg

 

Separation of property regime

separation_of_property_ Infographic.jpg

For more information, please contact Sirin Yüce at sirin.yuce@crsblaw.com or Joanna Metaxas at joanna.metaxas@crsblaw.com

Our thinking

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Cosmopolitan quotes Sarah Jane Boon on how to deal with break-up admin

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • The Financial Times, The Guardian and City AM quote Sophie Dworetzsky and Dominic Lawrance on Labour’s proposed tax crackdown on non-doms

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • Why Switzerland is poised to become a prime jurisdiction for families to establish their private trust companies

    Dharshi Wijetunga

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys boosts international private wealth offering with the arrival of Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    News

  • Britain's most successful female Olympian has retired at 31, but how does the Family Court treat (early) retirement?

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • International Tax team joins Charles Russell Speechlys’ in Singapore

    Kurt Rademacher

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • Family Offices for Middle Eastern Clients

    Elinor Boote

    Insights

  • Planning opportunities for British expatriates returning to the UK

    Jeffrey Lee

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Nicola Thorpe on the importance of improving digital hygiene in the fight against cyber crime

    Nicola Thorpe

    In the Press

  • The role of national courts in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: good news for British ex-pats

    Lisa-Jane Dupernex

    Insights

  • New rules for non-doms: (Too) Short and Sweet?

    Alice Martin

    Insights

  • Drafting the “perfect” arbitration agreement

    Alim Khamis FCIArb

    Insights

  • Sarah Jane Boon writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on joint bank accounts

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • How the abolition of Multiple Dwellings Relief affects Build to Rent

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 2)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 1)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • Beware of not obtaining a court order when settling your finances

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

  • Vulnerable elders : a harrowing story and the lessons which need to be learnt

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Home buyers and sellers hit by cyber-attack

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • International Relocation: The Parent Trap 25 years on ...

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • Top Tips to Building your Brand - Women in Chancery

    Katelyn Silver

    Quick Reads

  • What next for residential property? Autumn Statement Update

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees should a Labour government add VAT to fees

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Quick Reads

  • Labour government - potential change to cohabitation laws?

    Sarah Anticoni

    Quick Reads

  • Caring across borders: The UK’s Homes for Ukraine scheme and the global nature of parental responsibility

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Quick Reads

  • Game of Homes: Transatlantic Disputes

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • 5 top tips to make estate administration easier for your executor

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • Back to School: How should recently separated parents face the new term?

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

Back to top