Working abroad: unintended consequences
Many employers have been very flexible about where employees are located when working from ‘home’ during the pandemic, particularly in the first few months. For some, it may have been a holiday home far from England, for others it has meant returning to their home country for an extended stay. Now that most offices are returning to some office based working, many employers have required employees to return to the UK. Those that have been away for some time, or who continue to stay away, may find themselves facing unexpected immigration, tax and employment issues, with additional potential issues for those in regulated sectors.
Employees that are permitted to work for extended periods outside the UK may accrue employment protections in the territory in which they are working and residing. This may be the case even if the arrangement began as a temporary arrangement but has inadvertently become a longer assignment. Each case will be different depending on local law application but it would be prudent to take legal advice in the relevant jurisdiction to establish what these rights might be and to assess legal risks and possible exposure.
An employer may trigger additional tax liabilities by allowing an employee to work abroad for any extended period of time. The tax consequences will depend on the individual circumstances in each case and the jurisdictions in question. In broad terms, the main risks are: (i) triggering a local corporation tax liability through the inadvertent creation of a “permanent establishment” in the local jurisdiction and (ii) becoming obliged to account for local payroll tax and social security in respect of amounts paid to the employee whilst they are abroad. This is a complex area, and employers are advised to seek specialist tax advice, ideally well in advance of the employee’s departure.
In the financial services sector the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority expect UK authorised firms to have “mind and management” in the UK. FCA and PRA regulated firms therefore always need to ensure that they continue to maintain sufficient numbers of senior management who are physically present in the UK.
Additionally, the FCA expects firms to maintain the same standard of monitoring of staff working from home as they would in an office environment. In a speech on 12 October Julia Hoggart the FCA's director of market oversight said that "We expect firms to have updated their policies, refreshed their training and put in place rigorous oversight reflecting the new environment - particularly regarding the risk of use of privately owned devices."
Outside financial services in other areas where business is regulated it would be prudent to think about the consequences of allowing employees to work remotely for extended periods from an oversight and supervision perspective. Where appropriate advice should be sought from a regulator.
Prior to employees’ working remotely, outside of the UK, consideration should have been given to the visa requirements of that particular jurisdiction. Currently UK nationals can live and work freely across all EEA countries, however this position changes from 1 January 2021. EEA nationals arriving in the UK to work from 1 January 2021 will require a visa and we expect similar rules to be put in place for UK nationals seeking to work in EEA countries from this date onwards.
Each jurisdiction has different rules and business visitor visas are not always required in advance for business trips, usually depending on the individual’s nationality. It is common, however, throughout most jurisdictions - the UK included - that any type of ‘productive’ work is strictly prohibited under a business visitor visa. Penalties for illegal working can be severe, both for the individual and their employer.
If a work visa is required, consideration should be given to the current status of the immigration system in the relevant country, for example, there may be significant delays to visa processing times due to COVID-19. The employee may also be required to self-quarantine for a period in their country of destination and again upon their return to the UK. Depending on the employee’s nationality, travel bans might also be in place at a later date preventing them from returning to their home office. Finally, for employees in the UK who are not UK nationals, consideration should be given to their current immigration status in the UK and how this, or any future UK immigration application, might be impacted by a prolonged trip overseas, for example by way of an issue with excessive absences.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
UK SPACs: could changes to the UK Listing Rules spark an increase?
SPAC listing popularity has increased. Could the UK be the next hotspot following proposed changes to the Listing Rules?
Sustainable Investing: From ESG Integration to Impact Investing
We have a wide perspective on the range of issues that fall within the spectrum from ESG to impact investing.
Liability for costs of repair (City of London v. Leaseholders of Great Arthur House)
Oliver Park writes an article for Lexis®PSL on a property dispute case.
New tax on property developers - consultation paper published
The government published a consultation paper on the design of the new residential property developers tax.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
The Lawyer, New Law Journal, International Adviser, CDR Magazine and eprivateclient report on the firm's partner promotions
Charles Russell Speechlys promoted five lawyers to partner, effective 1 May 2021.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
eprivateclient and Citywealth report on the hire of a new international tax team led by Robert Reymond
The firm strengthened its international wealth structuring capabilities with the hire of an international tax team led by Robert Reymond.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.