• news-banner

    Expert Insights

National minimum wage update

Given the current situation in the UK, many workers may be on furlough with employers anxiously waiting for grants from HMRC. As a result, the national minimum wage (NMW) will not apply to those employees while they are on furlough leave. However, employers should be aware of changes to the national minimum wage laws.

New rates

The first is the usual changes to the rates. With effect from 1 April 2020, the following rates apply:

National living wage

(Age 25+)

£8.72

Adult rate

(Age 21 to 24)

£8.20

Development rate

(Age 18 to 20)

£6.45

Youth rate

(Age under 18)

£4.55

Apprentice rate

£4.15

Measures to simplify compliance

In addition, the Government has implemented some changes, which are more technical in nature, but are intended to simplify compliance and reduce instances of employers inadvertently being in breach of NMW.

Types of work

For the purpose of assessing whether workers have been paid NMW, workers are classified as performing work of one of four types:

  • Salaried hours work
  • Time work
  • Output work; and
  • Unmeasured work.

However, the definition of “salaried hours work” was much more restrictive than the name suggests. It did not apply to all those who received an annual salary, instead it only applied to those on annualised hours contracts who were paid either weekly or monthly and only received basic salary and potentially a performance bonus. It did not include those paid fortnightly or 4-weekly or those who received premium pay, e.g. for working on bank holidays.

Instead, those workers would predominantly fall to be performing “time work” and as such they had to be paid at least NMW for all time worked in each pay reference period. This potentially led to NMW breach as their pay remained the same each pay reference period, but their hours varied, e.g. because there are a different number of working days each month.

In contrast, a worker performing “salaried hours work” is assumed to work basic hours evenly over the course of a year and their average hourly rate of pay must be at least NMW for those basic hours. However, their actual hours worked may not be the same in each pay reference period. There are likely to be fewer compliance issues with salaried hours work, unless a worker’s annual salary is close to NMW and the worker is regularly required to hours in excess of their basic hours.

For example, a salaried shop worker may be required to work extra hours over the Christmas period, but would then be rostered for fewer hours at a quieter time of the year. If this worker was paid equal instalments of salary every month, but received a shift premium for working on bank holidays, the worker would be performing “time work”. It is likely there would be NMW breach in December because the worker would have worked more than one twelfth of their basic annual hours, but only been paid one twelfth of their salary.

With the new changes, there would not be a breach unless the worker exceeded their annual hours, for example due to an administrative oversight in being rostered for more than their basic hours under their contract.

Ability to have a standard “calculation year” for salaried hours work

A further change is to allow employers to choose the “calculation year” for monitoring whether a worker’s basic hours are exceeded where they perform salaried hours work.

To ensure compliance with NMW employer must check that each worker’s average hourly rate of pay for basic hours is above NMW. Where it is close to NMW, then employers will need to ensure that the worker only works their basic hours or there could be a breach of NMW.

Prior to this change, to check whether an employee works in excess of their basic hours required an individual assessment for each worker by reference to their first day of work. This made it difficult for employers to check whether basic hours had been exceeded. Going forward, employers can set a standard calculation year.

Action required

Due to transitional arrangements, these changes to broaden the scope of salaried hour work, and change the calculation year, do not take effect for at least two years unless the employer takes action. To have the benefit of these provisions more quickly, employers must give written notice to each worker which complies with various requirements. If notice is given, then the changes apply from the date specified in the notice, provided it is after 6 April 2020.

Reduction to pay for NMW purposes

There is also a small change to the rules about payments by workers which reduce pay for NMW purposes. At present if a worker makes a purchase from the employer in connection with their employment (e.g. the latest clothing line for uniform in a clothes shop) then it will always reduce NMW pay, even where the employer reimburses the worker (e.g. by providing a clothing allowance or allowing the worker to claim back the cost of such items).

Under the rules from 6 April 2020, if the employer reimburses the purchase it will not reduce NMW pay. This will also cover situations where employers provide money for the purchase in advance, e.g. a uniform allowance payment.

Enforcement

In February 2020, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy announced that it will resume naming and shaming rounds and intends these to occur more frequently. The NMW enforcement budget will be £27.4m for 2019/20, which is more than double the budget in 2015/16.

The latest NMW Enforcement Policy, published in February 2020, has also confirmed that HMRC will not take enforcement action where pay has fallen below NMW as a result of a worker participating in a salary sacrifice arrangement, provided certain conditions are met. These include the worker consenting to the arrangement and deriving a benefit, the employer repaying arrears and the prior conduct of the employer.

This article was written by Clare Davis at Charles Russell Speechlys. For more information, please contact Clare on +44 (0)20 7427 6552 or at clare.davis@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner and Sophie Rothwell write for Law360 on anti-bias protection

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Providing pro bono support on social housing issues

    Susan Field

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2024

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • Has a new route to recovery opened up for victims of banking payment frauds?

    Katie Bewick

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys boosts its Real Estate offering with the arrival of Kim Lalli and Rafe Courage

    Kim Lalli

    News

  • Cosmopolitan quotes Sarah Jane Boon on how to deal with break-up admin

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Building and Fire Safety Miniseries - part 1

    Michael O'Connor

    Podcasts

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Good news for users of the Madrid System

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Michael Gove's announcement on transitional period for two staircase requirement for new residential buildings

    Melanie Hardingham

    Quick Reads

  • Navratri at Charles Russell Speechlys

    Arjun Thakrar

    Quick Reads

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

Back to top