NDAs – an update following publication of the EHRC guidance
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has published new guidance “The use of confidentiality agreements in discrimination cases” two years after #MeToo was launched. The EHRC wants to call time on NDAs used to cover up discrimination, victimisation and harassment. Whilst the government is intending to tackle the inappropriate use of NDAs through legislation “when Parliamentary time allows,” no timescale has been set, no reference to the legislation was made in the recent Queen’s Speech and a general election is now looming. In the meantime, the EHRC guidance does not have the status of a statutory code, but it can still be used as evidence in legal proceedings. It is therefore important for employers to take the recommendations on board. The aim is to help employers understand when and how confidentiality agreements (also referred to as non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or “gagging clauses”) can be used legitimately. It also suggests employers take legal advice on whether an NDA should be used and if so, whether it is worded appropriately. Solicitors – both in private practice and in-house – must follow guidance from the SRA on the use of NDAs.
Terms and conditions of employment
The EHRC guidance states that where confidentiality clauses are included in employment contracts, employers should ensure that the wording does not prevent workers from making a discrimination claim in the future and that there is no pressure to sign the agreement. Workers should be given time to consider the agreement, seek advice if they wish and be given a copy.
Settlement agreements on termination
NDAs are typically included in settlement agreements – which is where most of the controversy has arisen. The guidance sets out circumstances in which an NDA is likely to be appropriate e.g. where the worker wants it. It also sets out the following good practice points:
- If an employer uses a template settlement agreement, confidentiality clauses should only be used on an as required basis and not included as standard;
- Factors for employers to consider in deciding whether to include a confidentiality clause include:
- Is there a clear reason why it is needed?
- What is the benefit to the employer?
- What is the impact on the worker of including it?
- What is the impact on the culture of the organisation?
- What are the benefits of not using it?
- Where used, it should be worded to deal with the particular circumstances of the case and not beyond what is necessary and appropriate.
- Employers can expect to be required to explain and justify their conclusions on the above issues, if the use of an NDA has been challenged.
Tackling the underlying problem - central record and monitoring
The guidance makes the point that settling a claim of discrimination is not the end of the matter. An employer should still investigate to ascertain what has happened. A claim may place the employer on notice of the existence of unlawful discrimination. It should take reasonable steps to address any discrimination identified and prevent it happening again in the future. If it fails to do so, the employer will not be able to rely on the statutory defence that it took all reasonable steps to prevent discrimination occurring.
The EHRC also makes a number of new recommendations in relation to tackling underlying problems. It suggests that employers should keep track of discrimination complaints and their use of NDAs to identify systemic issues and the measures needed to tackle them. Such steps will also help ensure that NDAs are not being misused in individual cases or to mask systemic problems.
The guidance recommends that:
- Employers monitor their use of NDAs;
- Large employers who use a significant number of settlement agreements and employers who operate across multiple sites should keep a central record of confidentiality agreements to monitor potential systemic discrimination issues;
- A central record system could include:
- When NDAs have been used;
- What type of claim they were used for;
- Against whom allegations of discrimination were made;
- What type of NDA was used and why they were used.
- Any record keeping should comply with data protection legislation;
- The board of directors should have oversight of the central record of NDAs;
- The use of an NDA should be signed off by a director or an appropriate delegated senior manager;
- NDAs should be signed off by an individual not involved in the act of discrimination or hearing any grievance related to it;
- The board should ensure that policies and procedures require managers to escalate concerns about the workplace culture, systemic discrimination or repeated or highly serious acts of discrimination by one individual.
The circumstances where an NDA will be unlawful arise where the NDA seeks to prevent a worker from whistleblowing, from reporting criminal activity or co-operating in a criminal investigation or from doing anything that the worker is required to do by law e.g. give evidence in court or to a regulator or the police. The guidance recommends that it should be made clear to the worker either in the agreement or by annexing an explanatory statement to the agreement that the NDA does not prevent them from doing any of these things. It also sets out people and organisations to whom workers are not prevented from talking, including medical professionals bound by an obligation of confidentiality, close family (provided they are asked to keep matters confidential), or potential employers (to the extent necessary to discuss circumstances in which their previous employment ended).
Penalty clauses must not be used i.e. any clause which requires the worker to repay compensation if the worker breaches the settlement agreement which is out of all proportion to the damage caused by the breach.
The guidance also states that workers should not be asked to give a warranty that they are not aware of any act or omission which would be a protected disclosure or a criminal offence, as this could potentially have the same silencing effect as an NDA. As it is unlawful to use an NDA to stop a worker making a protected disclosure or reporting a criminal offence, such warranties should not be used either.
The EHRC guidance means employers should be very clear on when it is appropriate to use an NDA, consider and record the reasons why an NDA has been used and be prepared to justify its use. The guidance specifically recommends that employers take advice. They should certainly do so if any doubt as to whether in any doubt whether (or to what extent) it is appropriate to use an NDA.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
UK SPACs: could changes to the UK Listing Rules spark an increase?
SPAC listing popularity has increased. Could the UK be the next hotspot following proposed changes to the Listing Rules?
Sustainable Investing: From ESG Integration to Impact Investing
We have a wide perspective on the range of issues that fall within the spectrum from ESG to impact investing.
Liability for costs of repair (City of London v. Leaseholders of Great Arthur House)
Oliver Park writes an article for Lexis®PSL on a property dispute case.
Do You Believe?
New tax on property developers - consultation paper published
The government published a consultation paper on the design of the new residential property developers tax.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
The Lawyer, New Law Journal, International Adviser, CDR Magazine and eprivateclient report on the firm's partner promotions
Charles Russell Speechlys promoted five lawyers to partner, effective 1 May 2021.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Charles Russell Speechlys boosts private wealth offering with the hire of an international tax team
Robert Reymond will be joined at the firm by Leigh Nicoll, Emma Tyrrell and Oliver Cooper.