Hirers retain flexibility as agency worker claim denied by the Court of Appeal
In a decision that will be welcomed by employers with a requirement to use agency workers to fill staffing gaps as work fluctuates, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that those workers are not entitled to the same number of working hours per week as permanent employees.
The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR) were introduced to ensure that the basic terms and conditions of temporary agency staff are the same as those enjoyed by permanent staff (once the agency worker has been in the same role for 12 continuous weeks). The relevant “terms and conditions” under the AWR include the “duration of working time”. The issue that the courts had to determine was whether this meant that an agency worker doing the same job as a directly employed employee should, after the 12 week qualifying period, be entitled to work the same number of hours per week that that permanent employee enjoyed.
Mr Kocur was an agency worker supplied to work at the Leeds Royal Mail centre. He claimed that after 12 weeks he should have been allocated the same number of working hours as the directly hired Royal Mail employees. The Tribunal, EAT and ultimately Court of Appeal all rejected his claim. Any arrangement that denied the hirer the flexibility to engage agency workers according to the fluctuating demands of the business would defeat the purpose of hiring agency staff. It was unworkable and not what was intended by the AWR.
The “duration of working time” referred to in the AWR related to working time limits under the Working Time Regulations, not the contracted hours of permanent staff. Any other reading of the AWR would enable agency workers to pick the permanent member of staff who worked the hours that suited them most (as there could be many different working patterns in the business) which would be entirely unworkable.
Fortunately for businesses that need to use agency workers to cover fluctuating work patterns, this is a very practical decision. Flexibility is the key for hirers, and had this decision gone in Mr Kocur’s favour, much of that flexibility would have been lost.
Since the AWR came into force in 2011 there have been relatively few related cases before the tribunals. The AWR are often cited by commentators as an example of employment legislation which may be repealed following Brexit. However, following the Good Work Plan, this does not seem to be the direction of travel at all. In April 2020 the widely used Swedish Derogation (a partial exemption from the AWR under which an agency worker may be given a permanent contract of employment with an agency, and continue to be paid between assignments) will be repealed. This will mean that all agency workers will be entitled to parity of pay after 12 weeks, and agencies must inform their relevant agency workers by 30 April 2020 that the Swedish Derogation no longer applies.
For more information, please contact Anne-Marie Balfour.
HR Magazine quotes Nick Hurley on redundancy and employee rights
"Unfortunately the legal remedies for employees in companies that become insolvent are very limited"
Unknown future claims cannot be settled
The EAT has confirmed that provisions in the Equality Act 2010 mean that unknown future claims cannot be compromised.
HR Magazine quotes Nick Hawkins on a pregnancy discrimination case and what companies need to be mindful of
Pregnant worker given parenting tips before sacking wins tribunal case
“Truss me, I quit!” - 5 Tips to Handle Unexpected Resignations and Post-employment Grievances
Read our guidance for employers on dealing with unexpected and “heat of the moment” resignations
Michael Powner and Ellen Roberts write for People Management on the benefits and drawbacks of novel compensation packages
The benefits and drawbacks of novel compensation packages
HR Magazine quotes Anne-Marie Balfour on the importance of protecting employee data
Interserve handed £4 million fine after staff data breach
What support should employers provide for menopause in the workplace?
We discuss the key support employers should provide for menopause in the workplace
People Management quotes Anne-Marie Balfour on employee monitoring
"Whilst monitoring of employees is not necessarily unlawful, it is a legal minefield"
What’s new in employment law podcast: Innovative reward schemes
As employers compete for the best talent, looking at new ways to reward staff is a key driver for recruitment and retention.
Sophie Rothwell writes for Employment Law Journal on demystifying employment contracts
Demystifying employment contracts: Beyond the basics
The EAT has held that a document did not become privileged retrospectively when an amended version was disclosed
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that a grievance investigation report did not retrospectively attract legal advice privilege
Swiss/UK secondments – the basics
A short guide to the key requirements to second workers from Switzerland to the UK and from the UK to Switzerland.
Back to the office or quietly quitting?
Quiet quitting is where employees choose to do the minimum amount of work.
FT Ignites Europe quotes Nick Hurley on quiet quitting in the asset management industry
"I cannot see any employers embracing quiet quitting as a concept. Most companies will see it as something to reduce or eliminate"
UK Employment Law – A Guide
Looking to learn more about employment law? Discover exactly how it protects you with our complete guide.
Lesley O'Leary writes for The Law Society Gazette on law firm strategy
‘You need to have a frank discussion about the things that matter to clients’
Megan Paul writes for People Management on how business can help stamp out modern slavery in its supply chains
Stamping out modern slavery: how can HR help?
The Times quotes Kelvin Tanner on new scale up visas
"It is difficult to see how the scale-up route would be a more attractive option for an employer than the skilled worker route.”
Clare Davis writes for Personnel Today on hot weather and employment law
Hot summers, hot desks – employment law advice on working through heatwaves