Dismissal of a pregnant employee: what the employer knows, matters
The EAT has found that in claims for unfair dismissal by reason of pregnancy and pregnancy discrimination, the employer must know or believe the employee was pregnant when it took the decision to dismiss.
In this case, the Employment Tribunal had found that the employer made its’ decision to dismiss before the employee notified it of her pregnancy even though they did not communicate the decision to dismiss until after she had notified them. The Tribunal had originally gone on to find that when the employer discovered the employee was pregnant, they should have considered whether the reasons they were dismissing her were pregnancy related and revisited the reason to dismiss.
The EAT overturned the tribunal and made clear that in order for the decision to be because of the pregnancy, the employer must know of it. Nothing in the legislation creates a liability on an employer if it has treated a pregnant employee unfavourably because of something arising from her pregnancy (i.e. something akin to a disability discrimination claim) when there is no knowledge of the pregnancy (Really Easy Car Credit Ltd v Thompson).
News & Insights
Part year workers gain holiday advantage
This decision puts some part time employees in a more favourable position than full time employees when it comes to holiday pay.
Hirers retain flexibility as agency worker claim denied by the Court of Appeal
Court of Appeal confirms agency workers are not entitled to the same number of working hours per week as permanent employees.
EAT gives guidance on covert recording of meetings by employees
With an increased frequency of cases involving the secret covert recording of workplace conversations, the EAT provides helpful guidance.