Can an employer ever dismiss an employee on long term disability benefits?
The recent EAT decision in Awan v ICTS is a reminder of the difficulties faced by employers seeking to dismiss an employee who is absent on long term sickness benefits (normally in the form of permanent health insurance). Employees will often ask the court to imply a term preventing dismissal if it would deprive the employee of benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled. They argue that the employer should not grant those benefits with one hand and then take them away in the very circumstances in which it was intended they should be available.
Since this principle was first established by the courts in 1996 (Aspden v Webb), various exceptions have been carved out enabling employers to dismiss those entitled to long term sickness benefits in limited circumstances, where the reason for the dismissal is not the incapacity itself. For example for gross misconduct or in a redundancy situation.
In Awan, the employer dismissed Mr Awan for incapacity after two years absence, despite the fact that he had a contractual entitlement to long term sickness benefits. The EAT found that there was an implied term that the employer would not dismiss while he was entitled to these benefits. To do so would mean that the long term sickness benefits clause would be deprived of its substance, and effectively cease to be a be an entitlement at all.
There are however drafting steps employers can take to ensure they retain the broadest flexibility they can. Some points to consider are:
- Retain the ability to dismiss for incapacity despite the PHI benefits. An express clause in the contract should always override any implied terms, and avoid the difficulties of Awan;
- Ensure that within the benefits clause itself, benefits are only payable if the insurance company underpinning the clause accepts the claim;
- Reserve the right to withdraw or amend the clause;
- Consideration must also be given to any potential disability discrimination and unfair dismissal issues if the dismissal of someone on long term absence is being considered.
Once an employee has been accepted on to a long term absence benefits scheme, it will be rare that an employer will consider dismissal. There are however some occasions where it will be appropriate, and provided the contract is well drafted, and a proper procedure followed, this line of cases will not necessarily prohibit dismissal.
For more information please contact Trevor Bettany.
IBA Annual Conference
The IBA heads to Miami for its 2022 Annual Conference bringing together thousands hundreds of lawyers from around the world.
Joint Venture Opportunities
Join our panel where we will discuss various topics including Joint Venture structuring and Partner procurement.
Mind your business: Safeguarding your business against loss of mental capacity
Practical considerations to safeguard your business against loss of mental capacity.
FT Wealth quotes Sarah Anticoni on forum shopping
"Being the first to file for divorce is not a foolproof way of securing an English hearing"
What can UK investors interested in Life Sciences learn from their more experienced, including US, counterparts?
The recent tie-up between Canary Wharf and Kadans demonstrates the enthusiasm to access the lucrative UK life sciences market.
Helen Coward writes for Tax Journal on the main purpose test for SDLT group relief
Mainly ignored? The main purpose test for SDLT group relief
The Ayes have it - Collateral Warranties can be a ‘Construction Contract’
The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Limited v Simply Construct (UK) LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys advising Battery Ventures on the sale of SPT Labtech for £650 million.
Battery Ventures has raised over $9 billion to invest in software and services, enterprise infrastructure, and much more around the world.
Windrush Day 2022 – supporting access to justice
Charles Russell Speechlys is proud to continue supporting survivors of the Windrush scandal in their fight for justice.
The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022: Landlords and developers beware serious sanctions for non-compliance
The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022 received Royal Assent on 8 February 2022 and will come into force on 30 June 2022.
EG quotes Emma Preece on the Picturehouse and BNY Mellon rent arrears cases
“The case is being closely watched by landlords and tenants alike as the impact of the pandemic lives on in the commercial property sector”
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised long-standing client Stonegate on a series A investment into Peckwater Brands
Stonegate is one of the largest pub companies in the UK with a rich portfolio that covers over 4,500 sites.
Pro bono support for major office premises move for charity in Stoke-on-Trent
Emmaus entities provide safe homes, community support and meaningful work to formerly homeless people across the UK.
Financier Worldwide quotes Rachel Warren on the UK’s Economic Crime Act
Evaluating the UK’s Economic Crime Act
Julia Cox and Felicity Chapman write for International Adviser on the rise of pre-nups in the UK
Julia Cox and Felicity Chapman write for International Adviser on the rise of pre-nups
Property Patter: Reasonable Endeavours
What does it mean to use ‘best’, ‘all’ or ‘reasonable’ endeavours?
Could the UK’s Life Sciences Vision be restricted by its Immigration Policy?
We explore some of the visa options that may be open to businesses in the sector and their relative pros and cons.
Joshua Green writes for Spear's Magazine on Wagatha Christie’s lessons for HNWs
Wagatha Christie’s lessons for HNWs
Stephanie Bonnello writes for the Practical Law Dispute Resolution blog on witness evidence
When are witness summaries permitted instead of witness statements and when should material be struck out from a witness statement?
Hannah Turner writes for the EG Legal Q&A on the validity of a section 21 notice
Q&A: Tackling technicalities and typos