Can an employer ever dismiss an employee on long term disability benefits?
The recent EAT decision in Awan v ICTS is a reminder of the difficulties faced by employers seeking to dismiss an employee who is absent on long term sickness benefits (normally in the form of permanent health insurance). Employees will often ask the court to imply a term preventing dismissal if it would deprive the employee of benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled. They argue that the employer should not grant those benefits with one hand and then take them away in the very circumstances in which it was intended they should be available.
Since this principle was first established by the courts in 1996 (Aspden v Webb), various exceptions have been carved out enabling employers to dismiss those entitled to long term sickness benefits in limited circumstances, where the reason for the dismissal is not the incapacity itself. For example for gross misconduct or in a redundancy situation.
In Awan, the employer dismissed Mr Awan for incapacity after two years absence, despite the fact that he had a contractual entitlement to long term sickness benefits. The EAT found that there was an implied term that the employer would not dismiss while he was entitled to these benefits. To do so would mean that the long term sickness benefits clause would be deprived of its substance, and effectively cease to be a be an entitlement at all.
There are however drafting steps employers can take to ensure they retain the broadest flexibility they can. Some points to consider are:
- Retain the ability to dismiss for incapacity despite the PHI benefits. An express clause in the contract should always override any implied terms, and avoid the difficulties of Awan;
- Ensure that within the benefits clause itself, benefits are only payable if the insurance company underpinning the clause accepts the claim;
- Reserve the right to withdraw or amend the clause;
- Consideration must also be given to any potential disability discrimination and unfair dismissal issues if the dismissal of someone on long term absence is being considered.
Once an employee has been accepted on to a long term absence benefits scheme, it will be rare that an employer will consider dismissal. There are however some occasions where it will be appropriate, and provided the contract is well drafted, and a proper procedure followed, this line of cases will not necessarily prohibit dismissal.
For more information please contact Trevor Bettany.
Charity Training: Digital Transformation in the Charity Sector
We would be delighted if you could join us for the second session in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
Charity Training: Brand Protection
We would be delighted if you could join us for the first in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Practicalities in Cladding Claims
Insight into Issues with Cladding Claims
EWS1 Forms - the latest episode
RICS have now published their highly anticipated guidance on when EWS1 forms will be required.
Q&A: Am I insured for COVID-19?
Laura Bushaway writes for Estates Gazette on a recent claim under the “disease clause” of business interruption policy.
The Purpose Podcast: Corporate purpose
Simon Ridpath discusses corporate purpose and the rise of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in “The Purpose Podcast”
Client alert: Construction under competition law spotlight
We outline the three investigations which have either recently concluded or are ongoing together with what this means for businesses.
Looking beyond the benefitted land: confirmation that an objector’s wider property may be considered in applications to discharge/modify restrictive covenants
Read our recent case study on applicants who were prevented from developing a new house due to a restrictive covenant covering their land.
Further extension of coronavirus restrictions affecting residential properties: Where are we now?
The extension will be implemented from and including 31 March 2021 by the Coronavirus Act 2020.
Knight Frank Wealth Report: The Global Perspective on Prime Property & Investment
Knight Frank partners joined Charles Russell Speechlys for a virtual panel-led discussion on the Knight Frank Wealth Report
Case Study: One Blackfriars Limited
An informative and positive judgment for administrators selling high-value property in distressed and complex scenarios.
Keeping Up With Construction: Handover at Practical Completion - Practical Pointers
Practical tips for the handover of a successful project.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on Trident Royalties’ US$28m Placing
Trident Royalties plc is a growth-focused mining royalty and streaming company.
Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 30 June 2021
As the restrictions are extended, read what it means for you here.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Avation plc on £7.5m secondary placing
Headquartered in Singapore, Avation plc manages a fleet of aircraft which it leases to airlines across the world.
To Promote or not to Promote, that is the Option: Top 10 Tips with Promotion Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips with promotion agreements - what should you know?
Sleep-in workers not entitled to NMW for entire shift
A unanimous ruling by The Supreme Court in the Royal Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake and another case.
Amelia Goodwin quoted by People Management, Home Care Insight and Care Home Management on the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling in Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake
The court found that care providers do not have to pay the minimum wage to staff for time that they are asleep but on call during shifts.