Calculating holiday pay: the saga continues
Working out holiday pay continues to be less than straightforward and the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in Brazel v Harpur Trust looks at how this should be calculated for those with irregular hours. It has been long considered that the correct way of calculating holiday pay is to apply the percentage 12.07% to the amount the worker has earned so that this is calculated on an annualised basis consistent the entitlement of full-time workers to 5.6 weeks holiday per year. This is also the method suggested in ACAS guidance. However, the EAT has held this is incorrect and that workers with irregular hours should have their holiday pay calculated by reference to the previous 12 weeks earnings.
This means that in some cases a part-time worker who does not work the whole year will receive more holiday pay than a full time worker. The EAT held there is nothing to prevent part-timers being treated more favourably than full timers and that there is no justification for capping holiday pay at 12.07% for those working on a part-time basis.
This decision will directly affect any business employing casual or zero hours workers working irregular hours, term-time only workers in educational establishments and those who are paid rolled-up holiday pay. Although the sums involved are likely to be small for the particular individual, when applied across an organisation these can add up to a significant amount.
Employers who are affected by this need to consider what to do going forward and should consider taking advice on their particular circumstances.
News & Insights
Part year workers gain holiday advantage
This decision puts some part time employees in a more favourable position than full time employees when it comes to holiday pay.
Hirers retain flexibility as agency worker claim denied by the Court of Appeal
Court of Appeal confirms agency workers are not entitled to the same number of working hours per week as permanent employees.
EAT gives guidance on covert recording of meetings by employees
With an increased frequency of cases involving the secret covert recording of workplace conversations, the EAT provides helpful guidance.