Social impact and environmental, social and governance factors in investment: pension trustees’ duties and listening to the membership
The Government is consulting on clarifying and strengthening trustees’ investment duties in relation to stewardship and consideration of members’ concerns about investments and to require pension trustees to consider and document (and in some cases make publicly available) how they consider ESG (environmental, social and governance) factors will financially affect performance when deciding on an investment strategy.
The consultation follows the Kay Review in 2012, the 2014 Law Commission report on fiduciary duties and investment and the 2017 Law Commission report on social investment in pension schemes, as well as Pension Regulator guidance in 2015.
The primary duty of trustees of occupational pension schemes is to exercise the investment power in the best financial interest of members and to secure the best return over the long term while managing risk. In doing this pension trustees should take into account all financially material factors when making investment decisions. Material factors include the impact of ESG risks on financial performance.
The current legal requirement for pension trustees when preparing a statement of investment principles (SIP) is to state the extent (if at all) they have taken into account ESG factors in their investment decisions. The Government states that this has led to “confusion and misapprehension” among trustees with some pension trustees seeing them as low priority or even running contrary to the issues of financial return.
The proposed changes to the Occupational Pension Schemes (Investment) Regulations 2005 are intended to ensure that the role of ESG factors on financial performance is properly taken into account by trustees deciding on their investment strategy and preparing their statement of investment principles (SIP).
If the proposed changes go ahead, trustees of occupational pension schemes will be required by October 2019:
- to update their existing statement of investment principles (SIP) to include a policy on the evaluation of financially material considerations that includes not only accepted risks such as interest rate risk, liquidity risk etc that have an immediate financial impact but also ESG factors which tend to have a longer term impact. This must explicitly address climate change as a systemic risk that cuts across all issues.
- to include a policy on stewardship in their SIP that deals with core issues of voting (shareholder activism), engaging (with both businesses and investment managers where scheme assets are held in pooled funds), and monitoring.
- to produce a policy statement on how members’ views are taken into account when formulating an investment strategy.
In addition from October 2020, for schemes providing money purchase benefits, trustees will be required to make any updated SIP and the policy on members’ views publicly available on a website and produce an annual report on how they have implemented their strategy.
The changes proposed by the consultation will formalise the requirement for trustees to consider ESG factors when making investment decisions (they can currently state they do not consider them) and to turn their minds to the relevance of these factors on investment performance. For trustees of schemes providing money purchase benefits, the annual reporting and public nature of the SIP will focus attention on investment and ESG issues in particular.
The consultation expressly excludes from its scope any consideration of social impact investment (SII) which the Social Impact Taskforce and National Advisory Board suggest is defined as “investment in the shares or loan capital of companies and enterprises that not only measure and report their wider impact on society – but also hold themselves accountable for delivering and increasing positive impact”.
The proposed changes therefore offer no guidance on the risks of implementing ESG or SII policies for pension trustees who are considering the extent to which they can take into account non-financial matters as well as financial matters in setting their investment strategy. Please see our separate briefing note on this issue.
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Sleep-in workers not entitled to NMW for entire shift
A unanimous ruling by The Supreme Court in the Royal Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake and another case.
Amelia Goodwin quoted by People Management, Home Care Insight and Care Home Management on the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling in Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake
The court found that care providers do not have to pay the minimum wage to staff for time that they are asleep but on call during shifts.
Michael Powner quoted by People Management on the implications of Uber's decision to pay drivers minimum wage
Uber’s rollout of living wage will put further pressure on other gig economy firms to follow suit.
Rose Carey, Kelvin Tanner and Kate Gamester write for Compliance & Risk on navigating the UK's new immigration system
The article highlights the compliance pitfalls and how organisations can adapt to avoid them.
The UK’s post-Brexit rules for skilled workers – Key implications for the construction industry
As a result of the new Points Based Immigration System , UK companies in the construction sector will not be able to sponsor labourers.
How to manage redundancies: employee rights on redundancy
What rights do employees have when a redundancy exercise is carried out?
Michael Powner quoted by Personnel Today on the implications of the Uber Supreme Court ruling on the gig economy
While the case is fact specific, the decision is likely to be a very persuasive authority for tribunals ruling on others in the gig economy.
Michael Powner quoted by Bloomberg, PA Media and People Management on the Supreme Court's ruling on the employment status of Uber drivers
The Supreme Court unanimously found that Uber drivers are workers under UK law.
Nick Hurley quoted by the Daily Mirror on 'no jab, no job' policies
'No jab, no job' may seem clear and concise, but mandatory policies requiring the Covid-19 vaccine are far from straightforward.
How to manage redundancies: practical steps
What are the practical considerations when carrying out a redundancy exercise?
EMI share options, Covid-19, and Brexit – where are we now?
What are the new measures to employers operating EMI schemes that have been affected by the pandemic?
How to manage redundancies: initial planning
What should employers consider when preparing for a redundancy situation?
Post-Brexit Implications for UK/EU Business Travel
How companies need to monitor the activities of their employees on business trips in a post-Brexit world.
Trevor Bettany quoted by People Management on the use of 'fire and rehire' tactics
Trevor Bettany considers questions around the legalities of ‘fire and rehire’ tactics.
Anisha Vyas writes for City AM on the legal issues around mandatory vaccination policies
Nick Hurley quoted by SmallBusiness.co.uk on the legal issues around implementing mandatory vaccination policies
As the Covid-19 vaccine rollout continues, Nick Hurley considers whether employers can make it mandatory for staff to get the jab.
Employment update 2021: the year ahead
We set out a timeline of the key changes expected for the year ahead in employment law, and how to best prepare for them.
The EU-UK Trade & Cooperation Agreement is not a meaningful replacement of free movement
The TCA is vastly limited compared to free movement and simply extends the business visitor category.
Covid-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
Complying with Health and Safety regulations will mean mandatory Covid-19 vaccination for employees?