ECJ opens the door to banning the visible wearing of religious or political signs
The ECJ has today ruled (in two cases) that a dress code (whether formal or informal) which has, at its heart, the principle of projecting neutrality to the company’s client or customer base, is not directly discriminatory against any given religion. It is however potentially indirectly discriminatory unless the employer can objectively justify the dress code. That means the employer must show both a legitimate aim (here, neutrality to customers and clients) and demonstrate that their way of achieving that aim is both appropriate and proportionate. This is a balancing act and could potentially differ for different groups of employees – for example, can the same legitimate aim be applied to those who have no contact with customers as opposed to those who are in customer facing roles?
Both cases are returning to their local courts to apply the ECJ decision, so the Belgian and French courts will have the final say. The two cases, while applying the same principles, could well end up with different outcomes as the G4S v Achibita case related to a dismissal for failing to follow the company’s dress code, which the company will have to show was an appropriate and proportionate means of achieving their stated aim of projecting neutrality. In the second case of Bougnaoui v Micropole, Ms Bougnaoui was dismissed because a client did not want her to wear a veil, rather than because of an internal rule. In such circumstances it is difficult to see that any successful defence can now be put forward.
Once the UK has extricated itself from Europe, we are unlikely to be bound by these decisions. Discrimination law is, however, so ingrained in our employment practices that decisions like this are unlikely to be diluted by Brexit.
Our thinking
Rose Carey
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Sara Wilson
Sleep-in workers not entitled to NMW for entire shift
A unanimous ruling by The Supreme Court in the Royal Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake and another case.
Amelia Goodwin
Amelia Goodwin quoted by People Management, Home Care Insight and Care Home Management on the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling in Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake
The court found that care providers do not have to pay the minimum wage to staff for time that they are asleep but on call during shifts.
Michael Powner
It’s all about the data…why has the government delayed hospitality reopening again?
Michael Powner
Michael Powner quoted by People Management on the implications of Uber's decision to pay drivers minimum wage
Uber’s rollout of living wage will put further pressure on other gig economy firms to follow suit.
Rose Carey
Rose Carey, Kelvin Tanner and Kate Gamester write for Compliance & Risk on navigating the UK's new immigration system
The article highlights the compliance pitfalls and how organisations can adapt to avoid them.
Rose Carey
The UK’s post-Brexit rules for skilled workers – Key implications for the construction industry
As a result of the new Points Based Immigration System , UK companies in the construction sector will not be able to sponsor labourers.
Trevor Bettany
How to manage redundancies: employee rights on redundancy
What rights do employees have when a redundancy exercise is carried out?
Michael Powner
Michael Powner quoted by Personnel Today on the implications of the Uber Supreme Court ruling on the gig economy
While the case is fact specific, the decision is likely to be a very persuasive authority for tribunals ruling on others in the gig economy.
Michael Powner
Michael Powner quoted by Bloomberg, PA Media and People Management on the Supreme Court's ruling on the employment status of Uber drivers
The Supreme Court unanimously found that Uber drivers are workers under UK law.
Nick Hurley
Nick Hurley quoted by the Daily Mirror on 'no jab, no job' policies
'No jab, no job' may seem clear and concise, but mandatory policies requiring the Covid-19 vaccine are far from straightforward.
Trevor Bettany
How to manage redundancies: practical steps
What are the practical considerations when carrying out a redundancy exercise?
Elliot Michaelson
EMI share options, Covid-19, and Brexit – where are we now?
What are the new measures to employers operating EMI schemes that have been affected by the pandemic?
Clare Davis
How to manage redundancies: initial planning
What should employers consider when preparing for a redundancy situation?
Rose Carey
Post-Brexit Implications for UK/EU Business Travel
How companies need to monitor the activities of their employees on business trips in a post-Brexit world.
Trevor Bettany
Trevor Bettany quoted by People Management on the use of 'fire and rehire' tactics
Trevor Bettany considers questions around the legalities of ‘fire and rehire’ tactics.
Anisha Vyas
Anisha Vyas writes for City AM on the legal issues around mandatory vaccination policies
Nick Hurley
Nick Hurley quoted by SmallBusiness.co.uk on the legal issues around implementing mandatory vaccination policies
As the Covid-19 vaccine rollout continues, Nick Hurley considers whether employers can make it mandatory for staff to get the jab.
Trevor Bettany
Employment update 2021: the year ahead
We set out a timeline of the key changes expected for the year ahead in employment law, and how to best prepare for them.