Religious discrimination in the workplace
It should come as no surprise that Equality Act claims in the Employment Tribunals account for more than one third of all claims each year. Gender and equal pay claims are consistently the most common of these, but an increased awareness of disability and religion and belief discrimination rights has led to a rise in the number of these types of claim. We take a look at topical cases on different aspects of religion in the workplace.
Refusing to remove a veil or headscarf
Most recently, in Achbita and another v G4S Secure Solutions NV, a Belgian employee of G4S who was dismissed for insisting on wearing her headscarf at work because of her Muslim belief was found not to have been the subject of unlawful discrimination by the European Advocate General.
This follows the French employee who refused to remove her veil at work, which she wore as a manifestation of her Muslim beliefs. The European Courts, in Ebrahimian v France, found that her employer’s insistence that she remove the veil was not in breach of her human rights.
In both of these cases, the employer successfully defended religious discrimination claims on the basis that their policy that “no religious, political or philosophical symbols” could be worn whilst working was justifiable. The employers’ objective was to ensure that their service was provided neutrally from a religious and ideological perspective given their wide range of customers in both the public and private sectors.
In the UK, the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) in Azmi v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council has similarly upheld an employer’s right to require a bi-lingual support worker in a school not to wear a veil (which covered all but her eyes). The requirement that she wore clothing that did not cover face or mouth or would not interfere with her ability to communicate with pupils was deemed a proportionate, justifiable means of ensuring best education.
Therefore, whilst in all cases the policy, provision or criterion (PCP) was potentially indirectly discriminatory, they were objectively justifiable.
Employers should ensure that if they have a workplace dress code they take into account the good practice recommendations in the Acas guidance on religion or belief and the EHRC Code of Practice.
Belief in the sanctity of marriage
Another recent religious discrimination case, Pendleton v Derbyshire County Council and The Governing Body of Glebe Junior School, concerned a teacher who was dismissed for standing by her sex offender husband because of her Christian belief in the sanctity of marriage. She was found to have been unfairly dismissed and subjected to indirect religious discrimination. She believed in the sanctity of marriage, subject to the full repentance of her husband, and refused to choose between her husband and her job. She asserted that her responsibilities toward safeguarding of the children in her school were not in any way eroded by her husband’s conviction. There was no allegation that she was involved at all or implicated in any way in his activities.
This is a highly emotive subject, but raises interesting points with regards to religious discrimination. The EAT considered the fact that the case involved unusual circumstances did not prevent the employer’s response of dismissing her being the operation of a practice for indirect discrimination purposes. Although the employer had not applied the practice previously their evidence was this is how they would respond in this situation. In looking at group disadvantage, the comparison should be made with people in long-term loving relationships but who didn’t share Ms Pendleton’s religious beliefs and who were given the same choice between their career and their long-term partner. The EAT considered that there was a particular disadvantage for those who held a religious belief in the sanctity of marriage as they would suffer a crisis of conscience if put in this position. This case shows there can be a practice, even for one-off unusual instances, if the circumstances indicate that is how the employer would respond.
This article was written by Emma Bartlett.
Our thinking
Michael Powner
Michael Powner quoted by Bloomberg, PA Media and People Management on the Supreme Court's ruling on the employment status of Uber drivers
The Supreme Court unanimously found that Uber drivers are workers under UK law.
Nick Hurley
Nick Hurley quoted by the Daily Mirror on 'no jab, no job' policies
'No jab, no job' may seem clear and concise, but mandatory policies requiring the Covid-19 vaccine are far from straightforward.
Trevor Bettany
How to manage redundancies: practical steps
What are the practical considerations when carrying out a redundancy exercise?
Elliot Michaelson
EMI share options, Covid-19, and Brexit – where are we now?
What are the new measures to employers operating EMI schemes that have been affected by the pandemic?
Clare Davis
How to manage redundancies: initial planning
What should employers consider when preparing for a redundancy situation?
Rose Carey
Post-Brexit Implications for UK/EU Business Travel
How companies need to monitor the activities of their employees on business trips in a post-Brexit world.
Trevor Bettany
Trevor Bettany quoted by People Management on the use of 'fire and rehire' tactics
Trevor Bettany considers questions around the legalities of ‘fire and rehire’ tactics.
Anisha Vyas
Anisha Vyas writes for City AM on the legal issues around mandatory vaccination policies
Nick Hurley
Nick Hurley quoted by SmallBusiness.co.uk on the legal issues around implementing mandatory vaccination policies
As the Covid-19 vaccine rollout continues, Nick Hurley considers whether employers can make it mandatory for staff to get the jab.
Trevor Bettany
Employment update 2021: the year ahead
We set out a timeline of the key changes expected for the year ahead in employment law, and how to best prepare for them.
Anna Rogers
Restaurants must keep innovating to survive the impact of another lockdown
Michael Powner
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme from 1 November 2020 to 30 April 2021
Reviewing the latest updates on the extended furlough scheme.
Elizabeth Beddard
UK Government considering a crackdown on unfair employment contract clauses
Anne-Marie Balfour
Covid-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
Complying with Health and Safety regulations will mean mandatory Covid-19 vaccination for employees?
Rose Carey
The UK's New Post-Brexit Immigration System: New Immigration Rules for Skilled Workers
Reviewing the post-Brexit immigration changes for those seeking to come to the UK for work.
Rose Carey
Tackling Recruitment & Potential Racial Discrimination under the UK’s new Post-Brexit Immigration System
What the new Skilled Worker route and the UK's new immigration system will mean for UK employers & their recruitment practices?
Esther White
Towards a new RPI - good news or bad?
Nick Hurley
ICO publishes guidance on responding to subject access requests
Taking a closer look at the ICO's recently published Guidance on the right of access and how to apply it in practice .
Trevor Bettany
Trevor Bettany quoted by People Management on the legalities of the BBC’s new impartiality guidance
Michael Powner
Extension of Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS)
Reviewing the points of the government’s announcement about the Extended Furlough Scheme.