Taxation of asset holding companies in alternative fund structures - draft legislation published
Draft legislation as part of Finance Bill 2021-22 has been published in respect of the much anticipated new regime for asset holding companies (the qualifying asset holding company (QAHC) regime).
The new regime forms part of the government’s wider review of the UK’s funds regime and seeks to enhance the UK’s competitiveness as a location for asset management and for investment funds. The stated aims are twofold: first, to tax investors directly where QAHCs are used to facilitate the flow of capital, income and gains between investors and underlying investments; and second, to tax QAHCs in proportion to the activities they perform.
The regime is only intended to be available to certain types of investment arrangements and it will not have any impact in respect of the taxation of profits from trading activities, UK real estate or intangibles.
Tax benefits for QAHCs and investors
The tax benefits proposed to be afforded to QAHCs and their investors are generous and address longstanding issues that have historically prevented the use of UK companies as holding companies for investment funds. The aim is to bring the tax treatment of QAHCs more into line with the tax benefits that are already available through the use of non-UK companies, to maintain the UK’s attractiveness as a fund jurisdiction. The qualifying part of the QAHC’s business will be ring fenced from its other activities for this purpose.
The proposals offer the following key benefits:
- a broader exemption from corporation tax on gains than is currently afforded by the substantial shareholding exemption;
- exemption from corporation tax on profits from overseas property businesses that suffer non-UK tax;
- greater ability to deduct interest payments for corporation tax purposes (and on an accruals basis) and removal of the requirement to withhold income tax from interest payments to QAHC investors; and
- capital treatment on repurchases of share capital by the QAHC from individual investors, with a stamp taxes exemption for the QAHC.
As expected, the generosity of the tax changes is matched by the stringency of the tests limiting the availability of the new reliefs. We have set out some of the most important points below.
QAHC qualifying conditions
It is proposed that a company (other than a UK REIT) will constitute a QAHC if it:
- is resident in the UK;
- meets both the “ownership” and “activity” conditions (described below);
- is not listed or traded on recognised stock exchange or any other public market or exchange; and
- has elected to be a QAHC. That election will be revocable.
The ownership condition is directed at ensuring that no more than 30% of the “relevant interests” in the company are owned by investors other than diversely owned funds managed by regulated managers, or certain institutional investors – so called “category A investors”. Category A investors include QAHCs, qualifying funds (broadly meaning diversely held collective investment schemes or alternative investment funds) and certain other institutional investors such as REITs and charities.
For this purpose, the definition of “relevant interests” draws on the rules for group and consortium relief: is broadly concerned with voting power and beneficial entitlement to distributions of profit and assets on a winding up, and takes the highest of any of those proportions. A notable difference from the group/consortium relief rules is that the proposed test also has reference to sub-categories of profits or assets where securities are in issue which have different entitlements by reference to the performance of those sub-categories. This is intended to address ‘side pocket’ arrangements, i.e. where a QAHC permits a non-category A investor to take equity in return for a contribution of assets where the equity tracks the contributed assets to the exclusion of other shareholders in the potential QAHC.
The legislation contains detailed provisions to identify (among other things): (i) the profits or assets available for distribution by a potential QAHC to which each person with a relevant interest is treated as beneficially entitled; and (ii) the circumstances in which a relevant person will be treated as being beneficially entitled to those profits or assets (e.g. in respect of carried interest arrangements and tax transparent qualifying funds).
The Explanatory Note to the Finance Bill 2021-22 (the Explanatory Note) indicates that where funds are required to have a regulated fund manager, it will need to be independent in order for companies owned by the fund to qualify as QAHCS. Draft provisions that will give effect to this requirement are yet to be published.
The activity condition will be met when:
- the main activity of the potential QAHC is investing its funds with the aim of spreading investment risk and giving investors in the company the benefit of the results of the management of its funds; and
- any other activities of the company are not carried on to any substantial extent.
‘Substantial extent’ is not defined for these purposes. HMRC take the view that substantial extent equates to 20% or more of a company’s activities in other contexts, notably the test for determining whether a company is trading for certain purposes, but this is certainly not universal across the tax code. The Explanatory Note suggests that this is intended to ensure that trading activity is at a “minimal level”, for example to permit the provision of intra-group management services to related companies for modest fees, which may suggest a lower threshold. Clarity on this point is needed either through specific provisions or guidance from HMRC.
Call for comment
The draft legislation and further detail (including the Explanatory Note) is available here.
Interested parties are invited to raise questions or give comments (email@example.com) by 14 September 2021.
Dilapidations: the law and the reality
Emma Humphreys outlines how the Dilapidations Protocol and related guidance applies in practice.
Bond Clarke and Charles Russell Speechlys act on sale of person-centred software to cow corner
PCS is an award-winning company, founded in 2013 to help improve the quality of life for people in social care.
The Chartered Institution of Taxation (CIOT) Budget representations for October 2021
The CIOT has recommended an extension of the EMI scheme and a fairly comprehensive review of the rules underpinning EOT relief.
Construction & Infrastructure Seminar
Experts will give insights and analysis on Building & Fire Safety, Case law updates and global supply shortages.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises shareholders of eCommonSense on sale to ECI Software Solutions
eCommonSense is a technology solutions provider focused on the construction and building materials supply sectors.
Examining the draft RPDT legislation
Helen Coward considers the important aspects of the draft legislation for the new residential property developer tax.
Charles Russell Speechlys wins best Legal Services: Private Equity at the Africa Global Funds Awards 2021
We are delighted to announce we have been awarded the Legal Services: Private Equity award at the AGF Service Providers Awards 2021.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Silbury Finance on a £55m facility to a Jersey unit trust
Silbury provides real estate development finance for professional developers seeking to acquire and build in the UK.
Who will carry the risk? Professional indemnity crisis in construction
The UK government announced details of its ban on the use of combustible materials on high rise buildings.
Charles Russell Speechlys acts for Cmostores Group Limited on its acquisition of JTM Plumbing Limited
CMO Group Plc, UK’s largest pureplay online retailer of building materials which recently listed on AIM.
Does China’s ban on crypto trading and mining mean the end of Bitcoin and crypto?
The role of IFCs in the post-Brexit environment
International Financial Centres (“IFCs”), are now on a level playing field with the UK when approaching the EU market.
Helen Coward writes for Tax Journal on the draft legislation for the new residential property developer tax
The government published draft legislation for the new residential property developer tax on 20 September 2021.
Jessica Arrol Caws
FCA confirms certain synthetic LIBOR settings to remain in 2022
Charles Russell Speechlys advises the founders of Compandben on the sale of the business to TopSource Worldwide
Compandben is one of the longest established international providers of employment solutions.
Construction Update on Building Safety and the Golden Thread
Find out about the construction update on Building Safety and the Golden Thread.
Victoria Younghusband, Jessica Arrol Caws and Giulia Brunello write for The Bahamas Financial Services Board 's GATEWAY Magazine on the role of IFC's in the post-Brexit environment
Victoria and Jessica consider the changing role for IFCs following the approval of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
Residential property developer tax: Draft legislation published and technical consultation launched
While a number of important issues have been addressed in the legislation, there is still a lot outstanding.
Strategic Planning for Modern Landed Estates
The second in our series of articles on succession planning for landed estates covering a wide variety of matters.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.