Market Abuse Regulation update: January 2021
UK MAR and EU MAR
With effect from 11:00 pm on 31 December 2020, the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) was on-shored as UK MAR. UK MAR applies to all issuers with securities listed or traded on a UK market or organised trading facility (Main Market, AIM, AQSE) or which have applied for admission. The MAR itself, now labelled EU MAR in British legislation, continues to apply where securities are listed or traded on a market or organised trading facility in an EEA Member State. Companies which have listings on, for example, Euronext Amsterdam as well as the Main Market will have to comply with both UK MAR and EU MAR and they and their PDMRs (and PCAs) to make the required disclosures to both the FCA in London and the AFM in Amsterdam.
For the time being, the FCA will have regard to ESMA guidelines and Q&A when applying and interpreting UK MAR. The FCA will continue to publish its own guidance in Technical Notes, its Primary Markets Bulletin and Market Watch.
Changes from 1 January 2021
The following changes were made to EU MAR (by the SME Growth Market Regulation) and will be adopted by UK MAR when the Financial Services Bill is enacted and comes into force (those changes that are not relevant to the UK are not listed):
Under MAR as originally enacted, a PDMR and their PCAs were required to notify the issuer and the home state regulator within three business days after the date of any notifiable transaction and the issuer had to make a regulatory announcement of the transaction within those same three business days. This provision has been amended so that the issuer’s announcement must be made within two days after it has been informed of the transaction by the PDMR (or their PCA). UK MAR specifies “working” days, which excludes Saturdays, Sundays, Christmas Day, Good Friday and bank holidays in England and Wales, for both PDMRs and issuers, while EU MAR continues to specify “business” days.
Under MAR as originally enacted, the issuer was responsible both for drawing up its own insider list and for ensuring that each of its advisers kept their own insider list. It is now an express obligation on any person acting for an issuer to keep their own insider list. An issuer can request another person to draw up the issuer’s own list, but the issuer remains responsible for and must have a right of access to the list.
SME Growth Market issuers
The following additional amendments apply to issuers which have their securities admitted to AIM or the AQSE Growth Market (or to an EU SME Growth Market):
Article 17 (4) of UK MAR (and EU MAR) permits an issuer to delay disclosure of inside information where 3 conditions are satisfied:
- immediate disclosure is likely to prejudice the legitimate interests of the issuer;
- delay of disclosure is not likely to mislead the public;
- the issuer is able to ensure the confidentiality of that information.
There is now a small dispensation in that AIM and AQSE Growth Market issuers do not have to keep a written record of their reasoning where they have delayed disclosure of inside information, so long as they are “able to justify its decision to delay”. Having said that, we would always advise an issuer to keep a note of their reasons for delaying disclosure. It is always very difficult to provide a justification after the event, if there is no contemporaneous note.
An SME growth market issuer can keep only a permanent insider list, rather than having to draw up a transaction insider list for every transaction. The permanent insider list should only list those who have access at all times to inside information.
PMB 31 – FCA’s Review of Delayed Disclosure Notifications
The FCA attached a summary of the findings of their review of notifications of delayed disclosure of inside information (DDII) to the November 2020 Primary Markets Bulletin 31 (available here). They highlight a number of matters for issuers and their advisers to consider and set out a number of areas where they will be increasing their oversight.
Where an issuer delays disclosure within the conditions of Article 17(4) (see above under Delayed Disclosure), it is required to submit a delayed disclosure form (available here) at the same time as it publishes the relevant inside information. The FCA found that only a quarter of issuers had submitted a DDII notification during the period under review (4 July 2016 to 12 November 2018) and are concerned that issuers may not be aware of the requirement to submit a DDII. More widely, the FCA conclude that this suggests that issuers may be unaware of the current notification requirements under MAR and potentially how to identify and handle inside information arising from the preparation of periodic financial information.
Where there is an announcement on “unscheduled financial information” (that is trading updates, trading statements or other ad hoc announcements regarding financial performance in between the timetable for periodic financial reports) no specific “legitimate interest” has been identified in the relevant ESMA Guidelines. While the FCA note in their guidance in DTR2.2.9G that a short delay may be acceptable where an issuer encounters an unexpected event, they were surprised at the length of the delay (average 21 days) they found.
As regards periodic financial information, the FCA received a lower volume of DDIIs than they had expected. They say that issuers should begin from the assumption that information relating to financial results could constitute inside information. This is consistent with their statement in TN 506.2 (available here) that it is not appropriate for issuers to take a blanket approach to their assessment of the status of the information and they should not consider that information to be included in their periodic financial reports will always or never constitute inside information.
The FCA were also surprised that the average delay for DDIIs of director/board changes (average 16 days), given that it is not a specified legitimate interest in the ESMA guidelines.
The FCA set out the focus of their future monitoring; namely, trading statements and director/board changes and generally on the overall volume of DDII notifications.
Market Watch 63
The DDII notification form refers to this newsletter of May 2020 (available here), which sets out the FCA’s expectations of market conduct in the context of increased capital raising events and alternative working arrangements due to Covid-19. This is worth reading as a useful reminder of the need to ensure that systems and controls are effective in a homeworking environment and that anyone who has access to inside information or information that might be inside information understands their obligations under MAR and how to identify and assess what might be inside information.
For more information, please contact Victoria Younghusband.
Marcus Stuttard will provide his unique insight and a "state of the nation" market update.
UK Construction Law Update: What Happened in 2021? What can we expect in 2022?
The panel will cover a number of key construction law topics to ensure you stay in the loop
Why “Divorce Day” may come 3 months late in 2022
Fraudulent misrepresentation and the awareness condition: will the Court of Appeal bring certainty?
Is the claimant proving that they relied on false representations?
Is Buy Now, Pay Later creating a new debt crisis?
BNPL providers are quick to claim that their services are offered with “no interest and no fees”, but is this really the case?
Restrictive Covenants Declaration that a restrictive covenant is no longer enforceable
Emma Preece explores restrictive covenants.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Topland Group on two key transactions
Topland Group is one of the largest multi-billion pound, privately owned investment groups.
A Little Help from My Friends? New Measures on Assistance in the Collection of UK Taxes in Guernsey and the Isle of Man
An important development for individual taxpayers, trust companies and other professional services providers.
Property Patter: What can the property world expect from Parliament and the courts in 2022
What’s ahead in the world of property law during 2022
Environmental Land Management: Whose carbon is it anyway?
Everything you need to know about Environmental Land Management Schemes.
Top 10 Tips for dealing with Easements
Everything you need to know about dealing with Easements.
The changing leasehold landscape: Government consultation on reforming the leasehold and commonhold systems in England and Wales
Lauren Fraser and Laura Bushaway explore the changes occurring in the leasehold landscape process.
Social Tokens: What are the regulatory challenges in the UK?
Social tokens are one of the latest innovations in the crypto space and have grown significantly in recent years.
PRA to further scrutinise cloud computing in 2022
Philanthropy Insights – A discussion with John Pepin and Rennie Hoare of Philanthropy Impact
Join us as we discuss the current landscape of philanthropy in the UK and current trends, priorities and concerns amongst philanthropists.
Yahoo and Food Business Africa cover the firm's involvement in Oba Pack's investment in the Babator Farming Company
Oba Pack Company Limited, a Ghanaian-owned agribusiness, purchased the Babator Farming Company Limited (BFC) on 31 December 2021.
The green lease: back for good?
Emma Humphreys and Phil Webb look at the growing interest in green lease clauses.
Expert Shopping – Seeking to rely on a new expert
A practice known as expert shopping may see the court order the disclosure of the previous experts.
On the employment horizon – 2022
We set out some of the key changes we anticipate over 2022 in employment law, and how to best prepare for them.
Playing for time with lease expiry
Emma Humphreys explores time with lease expiry from the perspective of tenant and landlord.