HMRC’s volte face on the “second home” SDLT surcharge
HMRC has this month updated its guidance on the 3% SDLT surcharge (also known as the “Higher Rates for Additional Dwellings” or HRAD) in its SDLT manual. The 3% surcharge applies (very broadly) where a purchaser of one or more dwellings already has an interest in a dwelling anywhere else in the world, and is not replacing their main residence. It also applies where a company is purchasing one or more dwellings (unless the flat 15% rate applies).
The residential rates of SDLT with HRAD on top are punishing, with a top rate of 15% (set to rise further once the new non-resident surcharge kicks in next April). If a buyer purchases non-residential property or a mix of residential and non-residential property then the 3% surcharge does not apply because the consideration is taxable at the non-residential rates of SDLT. If more than one dwelling is purchased in the same transaction (or as part of linked transactions), then a relief is available which can reduce the total SDLT bill (multiple dwellings relief, or MDR). But what happens when MDR is claimed on a mixed use purchase?
HMRC’s previous guidance stated that the surcharge rates apply where multiple dwellings are bought together with non-residential property and MDR is claimed by the buyer on the residential elements of the transaction. That view has now changed. In the new guidance, HMRC states that the 3% surcharge only applies to purchases of mixed use land if:
1. MDR is claimed in relation to the residential element of the transaction; and
2. the non-residential element of the transaction is “negligible or artificially contrived”.
This is welcome news but the position is still far from clear. HMRC does not provide an interpretation of the term “negligible or artificially contrived”, and so there is no “bright line” until this is tested through challenges to HMRC’s treatment of various transactions in the tax tribunal.
HMRC does address this uncertainty in its guidance, saying that if it is unclear as to whether HMRC would regard the non-residential element of a mixed transaction as “negligible” a non-statutory clearance application can be made to HMRC. This will however take additional time, could give rise to additional cost and risks a negative response, all of which may put off prospective purchasers from making such an application.
Taxpayers should consider if they may have overpaid SDLT on mixed use, multiple dwelling transactions in the last 12 months. In some instances taxpayers can reclaim overpaid SDLT for up to four years after the effective date of the transaction but this is subject to a number of conditions which would need to be considered on a case by case basis.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
Sustainable Investing: From ESG Integration to Impact Investing
We have a wide perspective on the range of issues that fall within the spectrum from ESG to impact investing.
Liability for costs of repair (City of London v. Leaseholders of Great Arthur House)
Oliver Park writes an article for Lexis®PSL on a property dispute case.
Levelling Up Life Sciences?
Can a restrictive covenant become obsolete?
Q&A on adverse possession
A successful application for title by adverse possession will result in the squatter acquiring possessory title to land.
New tax on property developers - consultation paper published
The government published a consultation paper on the design of the new residential property developers tax.
Claire Fallows quoted by Planning on how new PD rights for commercial buildings will change the system
Councils should be prepared for a flurry of applications in August.
Oliver Park writes for LexisPSL Property Disputes on liability for costs of repair
Oliver considers the implications of the decision in City of London v Leaseholders of Great Arthur House.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
The Lawyer, New Law Journal, International Adviser, CDR Magazine and eprivateclient report on the firm's partner promotions
Charles Russell Speechlys promoted five lawyers to partner, effective 1 May 2021.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.