Deemed delivery of notice
Great care needs to be taken in calculating the date on which deemed service has occurred when serving notice to the shareholders for a General Meeting (GM) or an Annual General Meeting (AGM). In serving notices, a UK company needs to ensure that it complies with both the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) and any provisions in the company’s articles of association (the Articles).
In this article, we consider the provisions under the Act only.
What does clear days’ notice mean?
Under section 360 of the Act, any references to days within the sections which set the minimum notice periods for general meetings are to “clear” days. What this means is that when calculating the specified notice period, the day of the GM (or AGM) and the day that the notice is given are excluded. Furthermore, when determining the date on which notice is given, we need to bear in mind the statutory deemed delivery provision (see below). For private companies (this does not include traded companies), unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice period for a GM (including an AGM), other than an adjourned meeting, is 14 clear days (section 307(1) and (3) of the Act).
For public companies, unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice periods are:
- for an AGM, other than an adjourned meeting, 21 clear days (section 307(2) of the Act); and
- for a GM, other than an AGM or an adjourned meeting, 14 clear days (section 307(2)(b) of the Act).
Under section 1147 of the Act, the rules on the deemed delivery of documents and information sent by a company to its shareholders are as follows:
- by post: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, prepaid and posted to an address in the United Kingdom, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was posted (s1147(2) of the Act);
- by electronic means: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was sent (s1147(3) of the Act); and
- website: deemed delivery is when the material was first made available on the website or, if later, actual or deemed receipt of notice (sent by post or electronic means) of the fact that the material is on the website (s1147(4) of the Act).
Section 1147(5) of the Act clarifies that we should not take in account any part of a day that is not a working day. Accordingly, if, for example, a notice was posted on a Friday, deemed delivery would be the following Tuesday.
Of course, all of the above is on the basis that the Articles do not have any contrary provisions (section 1147 (6) of the Act).
Private company or GM of a public company
|By post or Electronic means|
|Notice of GM posted||Friday 1 June 2018|
|Notice deemed delivered||Tuesday 5 June 2018|
|14 days’ notice||Up until Tuesday 19 June 2018|
|Earliest date of meeting||Wednesday 20 June 2018|
AGM of a Public company
|By post or Electronic means|
|Notice of AGM posted||Friday 1 June 2018|
|Notice deemed delivered||Tuesday 5 June 2018|
|21 days’ notice||Up until Tuesday 26 June 2018|
|Earliest date of meeting||Wednesday 27 June 2018|
What happens if notice is not validly given?
If a company does not send a notice to every person entitled to receive notice, the proceedings at the meeting may be invalid.
Notwithstanding the above, under section 313(1) of the Act, the accidental failure to give notice of either a general meeting or a resolution to be moved at a general meeting to one or more persons does not automatically render the meeting or the resolution invalid.
Section 313(1) of the Act, may, however, be overridden by the Articles except in relation to:
- notice of meeting required by shareholders under section 304 of the Act (i.e. when the directors are under a duty to call a meeting, which has been requested by the shareholders);
- notice of meeting called by shareholders under section 305 of the Act (i.e. when the shareholders can call a meeting because the directors have failed to do so under section 304); and
- notice of resolutions at AGMs proposed by shareholders under section 339 of the Act
Although these rules seem straight-forward, on many occasions companies have fallen foul of them, which, therefore, rendered the proceedings during a GM or AGM invalid.
For more information, please contact Dafni Loizou.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
The Lawyer, New Law Journal, International Adviser, CDR Magazine and eprivateclient report on the firm's partner promotions
Charles Russell Speechlys promoted five lawyers to partner, effective 1 May 2021.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Fudco Partnership on sale to Exponent-backed Vibrant Foods
Fudco is a family-owned business selling South Asian ethnic foods in UK and Europe.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Polar Technology on investment by BGF
Polar Technology Management Group is a holding company for engineering businesses operating at the leading edge of technology.
Use and Regulation of Renewable Energy Certificates in the UAE
The market for trading in renewable energy certificates is set to increase in both visibility and importance.
Odey and Hffx: partnerships with mixed membership
Examining two decisions relating to remuneration arrangements in partnerships with individual and corporate membership.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises shareholders of Modern Networks on sale to Horizon Capital
Modern Networks is a leading provider of IT support, broadband and telecoms managed services to the UK’s commercial property sector.
Patrick Gearon FCIArb
Insolvency Legislation in the GCC
The interesting times of the last 14 months were preceded by the interesting times of the financial crisis of 2008/2009.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on Trident Royalties’ US$28m Placing
Trident Royalties plc is a growth-focused mining royalty and streaming company.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Avation plc on £7.5m secondary placing
Headquartered in Singapore, Avation plc manages a fleet of aircraft which it leases to airlines across the world.
The Corporate team's involvement in Fishawack Health’s acquisition of PRMA featured in Yahoo! Finance USA, Markets Insider and Morning Star
Martin Wright and the Corporate team provided legal support on the acquisition of PRMA Consulting.
Charles Russell Speechlys, Strategic Partners of the Asoko Insight West Africa's Family-Owned Business Report
The report is the most comprehensive study of Family-Owned Businesses throughout West Africa.
Jessica Arrol quoted by Real Deals on the implementation of SFDR
SFDR aims to remove greenwashing and promote transparency in reporting ESG, but GPs and LPs are experiencing its flaws.