Reform of Retention
The use of retentions in the construction industry was thrust into the spotlight at the beginning of this year with the introduction of the Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill 2017-19 by former chartered surveyor Peter Aldous MP under the Ten Minute Rule. The Bill followed an earlier consultation.
The term ‘retention’ refers to the common practice of deducting a percentage (typically 3%-5%) of the payments certified as due under a construction contract. Half of the amount deducted is typically released to the contractor upon practical completion, with the remaining half released upon certification of making good defects at the end of the rectification period (usually 12 months after practical completion). In theory, retentions provide security to the employer against the risk that the contractor will not complete the works.
The practice of deducting retentions has long been criticised by contractors and sub-contractors. Common complaints are that retentions are released late, offset against spurious defect claims or lost to upstream insolvencies in the supply chain.
Often those most likely to suffer from non-payment of retentions are the SME’s further down the supply chain. The scale of the problem was highlighted by the collapse of Carillion, which was estimated to have held £800 million in retentions at the time it went into liquidation.
The Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill is aimed at protecting retention deposits withheld under construction contracts through the introduction of amendments to the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the “Construction Act”).
The amendments to section 111 of the Construction Act would mean that any clause in a construction contract that enabled a payer to withhold retention will be of no effect unless:
- the retention is paid into a special deposit scheme;
- the payer notifies the payee of the scheme administrator’s details; and
- the payer notifies the scheme administrator of the payee’s details.
Where retention monies are already being held under a contract that pre-dates the new Act, those monies must be transferred into a retention deposit scheme. Where a payer fails to comply with these obligations, it will obliged to refund the retention in full within seven working days.
At the time of writing, the Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill is due to receive its second reading on 25 January 2019. The Bill has received strong backing from some sections of the industry. Others claim the Bill does not go far enough and suggest that retentions should be outlawed altogether. Meanwhile, employers may be wary of additional costs and any attempt to fetter their access to the most common form of security in construction projects.
Charity Training: Digital Transformation in the Charity Sector
We would be delighted if you could join us for the second session in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
Charity Training: Brand Protection
We would be delighted if you could join us for the first in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Practicalities in Cladding Claims
Insight into Issues with Cladding Claims
EWS1 Forms - the latest episode
RICS have now published their highly anticipated guidance on when EWS1 forms will be required.
Q&A: Am I insured for COVID-19?
Laura Bushaway writes for Estates Gazette on a recent claim under the “disease clause” of business interruption policy.
The Purpose Podcast: Corporate purpose
Simon Ridpath discusses corporate purpose and the rise of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in “The Purpose Podcast”
Client alert: Construction under competition law spotlight
We outline the three investigations which have either recently concluded or are ongoing together with what this means for businesses.
Looking beyond the benefitted land: confirmation that an objector’s wider property may be considered in applications to discharge/modify restrictive covenants
Read our recent case study on applicants who were prevented from developing a new house due to a restrictive covenant covering their land.
Further extension of coronavirus restrictions affecting residential properties: Where are we now?
The extension will be implemented from and including 31 March 2021 by the Coronavirus Act 2020.
Knight Frank Wealth Report: The Global Perspective on Prime Property & Investment
Knight Frank partners joined Charles Russell Speechlys for a virtual panel-led discussion on the Knight Frank Wealth Report
Case Study: One Blackfriars Limited
An informative and positive judgment for administrators selling high-value property in distressed and complex scenarios.
Keeping Up With Construction: Handover at Practical Completion - Practical Pointers
Practical tips for the handover of a successful project.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on Trident Royalties’ US$28m Placing
Trident Royalties plc is a growth-focused mining royalty and streaming company.
Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 30 June 2021
As the restrictions are extended, read what it means for you here.
Steven Carey writes for Building on whether a company can provide expert services in claims for and against the same party
A recent appeal case looked at whether a company can provide expert services in claims for and against the same party.
InvestAfrica: Checking in or Checking out? Financing Africa’s Hotels in 2021
The discussion examined the strategies investors and financial institutions can implement to mitigate the effects of the pandemic.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Avation plc on £7.5m secondary placing
Headquartered in Singapore, Avation plc manages a fleet of aircraft which it leases to airlines across the world.
Sleep-in workers not entitled to NMW for entire shift
A unanimous ruling by The Supreme Court in the Royal Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake and another case.
Q&A: Parking privileges
James Souter and David Nicholls address a resident’s parking dilemma.