Reform of Retention
The use of retentions in the construction industry was thrust into the spotlight at the beginning of this year with the introduction of the Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill 2017-19 by former chartered surveyor Peter Aldous MP under the Ten Minute Rule. The Bill followed an earlier consultation.
The term ‘retention’ refers to the common practice of deducting a percentage (typically 3%-5%) of the payments certified as due under a construction contract. Half of the amount deducted is typically released to the contractor upon practical completion, with the remaining half released upon certification of making good defects at the end of the rectification period (usually 12 months after practical completion). In theory, retentions provide security to the employer against the risk that the contractor will not complete the works.
The practice of deducting retentions has long been criticised by contractors and sub-contractors. Common complaints are that retentions are released late, offset against spurious defect claims or lost to upstream insolvencies in the supply chain.
Often those most likely to suffer from non-payment of retentions are the SME’s further down the supply chain. The scale of the problem was highlighted by the collapse of Carillion, which was estimated to have held £800 million in retentions at the time it went into liquidation.
The Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill is aimed at protecting retention deposits withheld under construction contracts through the introduction of amendments to the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the “Construction Act”).
The amendments to section 111 of the Construction Act would mean that any clause in a construction contract that enabled a payer to withhold retention will be of no effect unless:
- the retention is paid into a special deposit scheme;
- the payer notifies the payee of the scheme administrator’s details; and
- the payer notifies the scheme administrator of the payee’s details.
Where retention monies are already being held under a contract that pre-dates the new Act, those monies must be transferred into a retention deposit scheme. Where a payer fails to comply with these obligations, it will obliged to refund the retention in full within seven working days.
At the time of writing, the Construction (Retention Deposit Schemes) Bill is due to receive its second reading on 25 January 2019. The Bill has received strong backing from some sections of the industry. Others claim the Bill does not go far enough and suggest that retentions should be outlawed altogether. Meanwhile, employers may be wary of additional costs and any attempt to fetter their access to the most common form of security in construction projects.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Preparing your company for sale
We set out here some initial steps to consider in anticipation of a sale.
ESG investment and the challenges for trustees
What challenges does the ESG revolution present for trustees of private family trusts?
The impact of COVID-19 on commercial and residential tenancies
What impact has COVID-19 had on commercial and residential tenancies? Read more here.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises discoverIE on its acquisition of Antenova
discoverIE is a leading international designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics to industry.
Q&A: Separate blocks, common parts and enfranchisement
Miriam Seitler and Lauren Fraser answer queries relating to leaseholders seeking to acquire the freehold.
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
The family court’s role in micro managing 'trivial' disputes
The recent decision has dealt with the family court’s role in micro managing “trivial” disputes in relation to children
International Arbitration in India and Around the World
Rupa Lakha joined the panel discussing the latest developments in construction and dispute resolution.
Taxing horizons and fiscal black holes
A super-massive black hole at the centre of the nation’s finances means that tax reform and rates rises look increasingly likely.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Acora on acquisition of Westgate IT
Westgate IT specialises in providing IT support to businesses in the South West.
Q&A: Wrestling with restrictive covenants
Camilla Lamont (barrister at Landmark Chambers) and Real Estate Disputes Partner Emma Humphreys answer a pair of covenant queries
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Grape Paradise on the acquisition of a fine wine business
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised Grape Paradise on the acquisition of the Sarment Group in the China Mainland territories.
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
Collateral Warranties – Are they also a ‘Construction Contract’?
What are collateral warranties and what do they mean for your construction contracts? Read more here.
Succession Planning for Landed Estates
The first in our series of articles on succession planning for landed estates covering a wide variety of matters.
eCommerce and the Post-Brexit State of Play
Key UK and EU legislation governing how online platforms deal with consumers and their business users.
Post-Brexit business visitors and working in France, Germany, Spain and the UK
Watch the final session in a series of webinars on post-Brexit mobility.
UK work and business mobility in a post-Brexit world
Watch our first in a series of webinars on post-Brexit mobility.