Ensuring your Arbitration Agreement is Valid - Contracting with UAE Registered Companies
Arbitration agreements are commonplace in construction contracts throughout the UAE and across the wider Middle East region. This is especially so in circumstances involving a foreign entity (or local branch of a foreign entity) or a foreign subject matter, whereby arbitration is now the preferred method of dispute resolution for the majority of contracting parties.
In addition, the ability of the parties to choose members of the arbitral tribunal is seen as a key factor in construction arbitrations, as it allows the parties to include not only legal experts but technical experts as well. This is particularly important given that the nature of the majority of construction disputes includes a technical aspect, be that in relation to extensions of time, variations and/or delays.
Whilst many parties believe that simply including an arbitration agreement within a construction contract is sufficient, it has become increasingly clear, with the UAE Courts’ recent willingness to step in and rule that arbitration agreements are not valid (even for a contract that is not governed by UAE law), that parties need to carefully consider the construction of any arbitration agreement entered into.
What is an Arbitration Agreement?
An arbitration agreement allows the parties to a contract to agree that all, or specific, disputes arising out of a contract will be heard under the auspices of an Arbitration Centre such as the DIFC-LCIA, Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution, London Court of International Arbitration or the International Chamber of Commerce (to name some of the global centres).
In addition to choosing the arbitration centre, and the applicable set of Rules (which usually follow the choice of arbitration centre) to govern the dispute, a properly drafted arbitration agreement will also include the number of arbitrators that will form the tribunal (usually 1 or 3), the place of the arbitration and the seat of the arbitration (the overriding governing law of the arbitration procedure).
Although arbitration agreements are usually clauses contained within a construction contract, under UAE law they are seen as a separate agreement altogether. They therefore have specific legal provisions which entitle a party to enter into one. Therefore simply including one within your construction contract will not be sufficient to comply with UAE Law.
Requisite authority for UAE Companies
Under the New UAE Arbitration Law (Federal Law No. 6 of 2018), Article 4(1) “An Arbitration Agreement may only be concluded, on pain of nullity, by a natural person having the legal capacity to dispose of his rights or on behalf of a juridical person by a representative with specific authority to arbitrate.”
This Article highlights the requirement for there to be ‘specific authority’ for any company representative to legally bind that entity to an Arbitration Agreement.
In addition, Article 154 of the New UAE Companies Law (Federal Law No. 2 of 2015), which applies to almost all companies established in the UAE, states that unless directors are given specific authority to enter into an arbitration agreement under the Articles of Association they cannot do so without a special resolution from the general assembly.
Recent Case Law
Whilst there have been conflicting judgments emerging from the UAE, and in particular the Dubai Courts (including the Court of Cassation which is the highest Court in Dubai), it has become clear that the law will be strictly construed in relation to authority to enter into arbitration agreements.
Recently, the Dubai Court of Cassation held that a JAFZA offshore entity was required to comply with the UAE Federal Laws referred to above on the basis that there is no provision contained within the JAFZA Regulations which expressly excludes the UAE Federal Laws.
Under the arbitration agreement that the JAFZA offshore entity had entered into, the governing law of the contract was England and Wales with any arbitration to be held at the DIFC-LCIA centre, under the DIFC-LCIA Rules. The seat of the arbitration was DIFC.
Initially, the Dubai Court of First Instance accepted jurisdiction on the basis that the arbitration agreement was invalid as the signatory to the contract had no specific authority to agree to arbitrate as required under UAE Federal Law.
On appeal, the Court of Appeal reversed this decision.
The Court of Cassation then ruled that, contrary to the Court of Appeal’s decision, the arbitration agreement was indeed invalid. This meant that the Dubai Courts had jurisdiction. The Court of Cassation found that authority to enter into the contract containing the arbitration agreement was not sufficient as there was not express authority for the signatory to enter into the arbitration agreement.
No detailed reasoning was given for the Court of Cassation’s decision.
What is clear from the above is that arbitration agreements entered into by UAE companies may be open to challenge in the UAE Courts if the person entering into such arbitration agreement does not have the requisite authority to do so under UAE Federal Law.
This ability to enter into an arbitration agreement by a UAE company is governed by UAE Federal law regardless of the choice of law of the contract. Therefore a UAE company which is subject to any arbitration proceedings may bring a case in the UAE Courts to avoid such arbitration proceedings on the basis that they did not have the requisite consent to enter into the arbitration agreement as required by UAE Federal Law.
Practical Points to Note
1. If you are a UAE registered entity (including a foreign branch) entering into a construction contract which includes an arbitration agreement:
a) Include specific authority in the Articles of Association allowing specific individuals (such as members of the Board of Directors) to enter into arbitration agreements; or
b) Obtain a special resolution for each construction contract stating that the person signing the contract is allowed to not only enter into the contract, but specifically enter into the arbitration agreement.
2. If you are either a UAE registered entity or a foreign entity contracting with a UAE registered entity (regardless of the choice of law) you should request proof of the authority of the person entering into the construction contract that confirms that they have the requisite authority to enter into the arbitration agreement as per 1(a) or 1(b) above.
3. If a construction contract containing an arbitration agreement is assigned or novated to a UAE company, the requisite authority to agree to the arbitration agreement needs to be explicit as per 1(a) or 1(b) above.
4. Do not assume that because the construction contract is not governed by UAE law that the UAE Federal Laws in this respect will not apply to the arbitration agreement.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
The Future of Property Careers
Join to our panel discussion and Q&A with industry leaders on the range of opportunities within the property and construction sector.
Liability for costs of repair (City of London v. Leaseholders of Great Arthur House)
Oliver Park writes an article for Lexis®PSL on a property dispute case.
New tax on property developers - consultation paper published
The government published a consultation paper on the design of the new residential property developers tax.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Rupa Lakha quoted by Legal Week on the liberalisation of the Indian legal market
The proposed trade deal could be “the proper catalyst for liberalisation”.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Charles Russell Speechlys boosts private wealth offering with the hire of an international tax team
Robert Reymond will be joined at the firm by Leigh Nicoll, Emma Tyrrell and Oliver Cooper.
ICC 2021 Rules
The ICC has recently updated its rules for arbitration: the new rules entered into force on 1 January 2021 (the “2021 Rules”).
Rachel Warren quoted by Construction Law on the increasing pressure on the HSE over Covid deaths
The Health & Safety Executive is likely to face increasing pressure to take enforcement action where employees have died from Covid.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.