Robotics in Construction: The Legal Issues
One of the recent technological advances that is likely to have a significant effect on the construction industry is the growing use of automation and robotics.
This has already revolutionised manufacturing. Companies can now produce new cars, smart phones and computers with a speed and efficiency not possible with humans alone. Its impact on the construction industry has not yet been as great but this could be starting to change.
Robotics and their use in construction
Robotics promises a chance to transform the efficiency and quality of developments:
- Autonomous vehicles – There is already significant focus on self-driving freight and personnel transport, but potential advantages go further. Automated bulldozers, cranes and other vehicles could facilitate consistent and continually productive work.
- Robots on site powered by AI and machine learning – This could revolutionise a number of conventional construction methods. For example, there are already companies producing robotic brick-layers. In the future, such robots could build structures in extreme or inhospitable environments and lower human involvement in dangerous tasks on site.
- Pre-fabrication using robots – This could allow buildings to be manufactured in kit-form in factory conditions before being installed on site.
Legal issues in the use of robotics
As is so often the case, the introduction of new technology will bring new issues that must be addressed:
- A fundamental concern for construction participants is an appropriate allocation of risk. Issues may arise from sub-contracting to robotics providers regarding determining responsibility for errors and sub-standard work. Particularly as the development of ‘self-learning’ robotics could increasingly detach the performance of machines from the human input dictating their behaviour. The robotics providers may (particularly in the early take up of such technology) be small companies with limited financial strength, who may be unwilling to accept the standard risk profile of construction companies.
- Will robotics providers be able to obtain insurance with the same coverage as traditional contractors? This is particularly relevant for new technology and its potential to cause damage. What exclusions could apply to such insurance? For example, would it cover damage caused by cyber risk?
- A potential over-reliance on a small number of providers. This could cause problems if the provider became insolvent during a project: who controls the robot, the difficulty of migrating to a new supplier, what happens to the machine learning of a robot that has been trained for that site?
- The importance of support by the providers. What are their obligations to maintain the robot? Is there an obligation to keep its software up to date on long projects to meet evolving IT standards?
- What is the extent of the provider’s obligation to provide services to help train the robot? Does the provider simply provide the robot and the relevant code, or is the provider obliged to configure, implement and train the robot to perform the required functions?
- Can specific KPIs be applied, e.g. the number of bricks laid per hour or the service levels for support for the robot, such as response and resolution times for breakdowns in the robot?
- Who benefits from a robot’s learning on a specific project? This is a very open question. The robot providers supply the robot and underlying software but the clients provide the data and time on site that allows it to learn. The increased efficiency from such learning could have a significant value in future projects.
- Are new health and safety policies required to ensure a safe interaction between humans and machines?
- Robots typically respond to a range of stimuli, including visual and audio cues. This involves the use of microphones and cameras. As with the public use of any such technology, measures must be taken to ensure any personal data inadvertently (or intentionally) collected is handled in accordance with relevant data protection laws.
- Robots may be programmed with or collect confidential information such as plans and designs for on-going projects. Due consideration should be given to the legal steps taken to ensure confidentiality of such information and the licences required to use such information.
The development of robotics conjures ideas of fully-automated building sites. However, it is much more likely that robots will always work with humans. They could take on the more dangerous tasks and those requiring greater speed or strength, so that humans can concentrate on supervision and the more innovative jobs on site.
This future may bring new risk profiles in construction contracts and additional contractual provisions to deal with matters such as software, support and cyber risk. However, the real question is how this technology will develop and its impact on site.
This article was first published in Building.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
The Future of Property Careers
Join to our panel discussion and Q&A with industry leaders on the range of opportunities within the property and construction sector.
New tax on property developers - consultation paper published
The government published a consultation paper on the design of the new residential property developers tax.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Rupa Lakha quoted by Legal Week on the liberalisation of the Indian legal market
The proposed trade deal could be “the proper catalyst for liberalisation”.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Charles Russell Speechlys boosts private wealth offering with the hire of an international tax team
Robert Reymond will be joined at the firm by Leigh Nicoll, Emma Tyrrell and Oliver Cooper.
Rachel Warren quoted by Construction Law on the increasing pressure on the HSE over Covid deaths
The Health & Safety Executive is likely to face increasing pressure to take enforcement action where employees have died from Covid.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.
Building Back Better: Future Gazing
What’s next for the hospitality industry post-pandemic?