Building a better Britain? Brexit and the Construction sector
On 24 June, the UK awoke to discover it had voted to leave the European Union. Within hours the Prime Minister had resigned and the effects of the uncertainty were being felt within the currency exchange and stock markets.
Whilst it is still early days and the effects of Brexit are still being judged, construction is one sector which has already been impacted. On 4 July 2016, it was reported that the UK construction industry had suffered its worst contraction in seven years in June as the sector was rocked by uncertainty over the outcome of the Brexit vote. In this article we examine why and assess the prospects in the near term.
This was not unexpected. Even before the referendum, it had been reported that employers were holding back on instructing the commencement of projects. Speaking in the Financial Times, David Noble, CEO at the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, said the sector was “awash with caution and hesitancy” not seen since the pre-election lull in 2015 when speculation of a hung parliament was rife. He added that clients were “unwilling to commit to new contracts or expand existing work.”
The European Union (EU) is one of the main sources of project funding for the construction of infrastructure and housing projects. There is a serious concern that the EU’s institutions will now be unwilling to provide funding to a member state that has resolved to leave the Union.
One of those institutions is the European Investment Bank (EIB). In recent years, the EIB has provided around €43 billion of funding for UK projects.
On 26 April 2016, the EIB announced its intention to invest around £1 billion in social housing schemes in the UK over a 30 year period. EIB has also approved £580m worth of bilateral loans to four housing associations in England and Northern Ireland, including Family Mosaic (£150m); Sovereign HA (£150m); Choice Housing (£150m); and Apex Housing (£130m). Others in the pipeline include associations in England and Scotland.
The UK had also been a major beneficiary of the so-called “Juncker plan”, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI). The EU Commission has said that while existing ESFI project commitments will be maintained, the activities of the EIB in the UK will be the subject of negotiations following activation of Article 50 of the EU Treaty.
This spells wide-scale uncertainty for many projects with a real risk that many will need to be pulled if EU funding is ultimately withdrawn and not replaced from elsewhere.
The construction industry has benefited from the free movement of labour from the other EU member states. Many skilled and unskilled workers have opted to move here to work on construction projects. Although many builders consider that labour costs remain too high, this addition of flexibility within the work-force has helped attenuate the effect.
At the time of writing, HM Government has not yet activated Article 50 of the EU Treaty, the process which will formally terminate the UK’s membership of the European Union. Once the Government gives its notification under Article 50, it will negotiate the terms of the UK’s continued relationship with the EU. Free movement of workers will be one of the matters up for discussion. It is currently unknown whether EU nationals resident in Britain will be allowed to stay here or face deportation.
Developments will be watched with interest by the industry. There is not only a concern that Brexit could push up hiring costs but also that companies could lose valued employees to the political fall-out of the referendum.
Market access in other Member States
Businesses currently benefit from the provisions on free movement of goods, services, workers and capital in the EU, which enables them to take up opportunities within other member states. The level of flexibility open to cross-border operations will depend very much on the terms of any free trade agreement reached between the UK and EU. Pivotal to market access for EU opportunities are the rules on public procurement, which have required the opening up of bidding for major public contracts to the whole internal market on an equal and transparent basis. It is not clear whether UK firms could be blocked from competing for contract opportunities in continental Europe.
The effect of departure from the EU on foreign direct investment
There are real fears that investors may think twice about the UK as a destination, given the uncertainty over whether it will remain a member of the EU single market. There could be a knock-on effect for the industry as a result. Fewer external investors means reduced demand for UK properties and for the building of new commercial or residential premises.
The Single Environmental Assessment Directive states that environmental assessments must be carried out for specified plans and programmes. Post-Brexit, it is unclear whether the Government will continue to require such assessments to be conducted. The issue is one of immense importance as assessments can extend the time required to complete an infrastructure project and a failure to complete one satisfactorily can lead to a legal challenge and related delay.
It is unclear whether the Government will move to repeal these measures. Whilst a degree of deregulation would be welcomed by many, it would be unpalatable to others. Further, it would require the UK to leave international treaties, such as the Aarhus Convention, on which many of these legislative measures are based in any event. Politically that could be very difficult.
In our view, it is imperative that the Government moves quickly in order to address the deep concerns held by the industry. These are undermining growth in a strategically important part of the economy and one which is essential to ensuring that the country has the infrastructure and facilities necessary to meet the needs of its population. Prior to the referendum, assurances were given by the Leave campaign that there would be no need to remove EU citizens from the UK and that national Government could match the funding provided by EU bodies in all areas. It would greatly assist the house-building and construction industries sectors if these words could be matched by concrete guarantees that protecting the sector will be a cornerstone of building a prosperous post-Brexit Britain.
Joint Venture Opportunities
Join our panel where we will discuss various topics including Joint Venture structuring and Partner procurement.
Construction & Infrastructure Seminar
Join our experts who will give insights and analysis on the latest sector updates.
The Ayes have it - Collateral Warranties can be a ‘Construction Contract’
The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Limited v Simply Construct (UK) LLP
The balance between Fairness and Certainty in UAE Construction Contracts
Articles 106 and 390(20) arguably make the UAE more focused on fairness than some of its counterparts in the GCC.
Carolyn Davies and Oliver Park write for Property Week on the key property points in the Building Safety Act
The key property points in the Building Safety Act
Carolyn Davies writes for Construction News on stakeholders new duties under the Building Safety Act
“The act brings some of the most significant changes to the construction industry in years”
Steven Carey writes for Building Magazine on the new Building Safety Act and the associated changes
Steven Carey writes for Building Magazine on the Building Safety Act
David Savage writes for PBC Today on the end of rebated fuel
David Savage writes for PBC Today on the end of rebated fuel
David Savage quoted in Building Magazine on construction red diesel usage
David Savage comments in Building Magazine on the use of red diesel in the construction industry
Fiona Edmond quoted in Building Magazine on the potential legal impact to contractors
Fiona Edmond quoted in Building Magazine on the potential legal implications to contractors
Explain the rules for disclosure of documents
Michael and Octavia explore the case of Provimi France SAS and others v Stour Bay Company Ltd.
Jane Burrows writes for Building on when defects could prevent practical completion
Jane Burrows explains when a defect could prevent practical completion as opposed to just being a snagging item.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Derwent London on £158m building contract with Laing O’Rourke
Derwent London is a British-based property investment and development business.
David Savage quoted by The Construction Index on the implications of the proposed The Carbon Emissions (Buildings) Bill
The bill requiring the whole-life carbon emissions of buildings to be reported has started its passage through the legislative system.
Mazin Al Mardhi
Mazin Al Mardhi and Dana Marshad write for The Construction Disputes Law Review on developments to construction law in Bahrain
Mazin and Dana provide an update on the latest developments to construction law in Bahrain,
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Topland Group on two key transactions
Topland Group is one of the largest multi-billion pound, privately owned investment groups.
Expert Shopping – Seeking to rely on a new expert
A practice known as expert shopping may see the court order the disclosure of the previous experts.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Derwent on Francis House letting to Edelman
The firm advises long-standing client Derwent London plc on the letting of Francis House in London to global communications firm Edelman.
Chi Mount writes for Building on the differences between a reasonable skill and care obligation and a fitness for purpose obligation
Chi explains the differences between a reasonable skill and care obligation and a fitness for purpose obligation.
James Worthington quoted by Construction Law on the Private Member’s Bill proposing to abolish cash retentions within construction contracts
A Private Member’s Bill proposing to abolish cash retentions within construction contracts has had its first reading in the House of Lords.