Building a better Britain? Brexit and the Construction sector
On 24 June, the UK awoke to discover it had voted to leave the European Union. Within hours the Prime Minister had resigned and the effects of the uncertainty were being felt within the currency exchange and stock markets.
Whilst it is still early days and the effects of Brexit are still being judged, construction is one sector which has already been impacted. On 4 July 2016, it was reported that the UK construction industry had suffered its worst contraction in seven years in June as the sector was rocked by uncertainty over the outcome of the Brexit vote. In this article we examine why and assess the prospects in the near term.
This was not unexpected. Even before the referendum, it had been reported that employers were holding back on instructing the commencement of projects. Speaking in the Financial Times, David Noble, CEO at the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, said the sector was “awash with caution and hesitancy” not seen since the pre-election lull in 2015 when speculation of a hung parliament was rife. He added that clients were “unwilling to commit to new contracts or expand existing work.”
The European Union (EU) is one of the main sources of project funding for the construction of infrastructure and housing projects. There is a serious concern that the EU’s institutions will now be unwilling to provide funding to a member state that has resolved to leave the Union.
One of those institutions is the European Investment Bank (EIB). In recent years, the EIB has provided around €43 billion of funding for UK projects.
On 26 April 2016, the EIB announced its intention to invest around £1 billion in social housing schemes in the UK over a 30 year period. EIB has also approved £580m worth of bilateral loans to four housing associations in England and Northern Ireland, including Family Mosaic (£150m); Sovereign HA (£150m); Choice Housing (£150m); and Apex Housing (£130m). Others in the pipeline include associations in England and Scotland.
The UK had also been a major beneficiary of the so-called “Juncker plan”, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI). The EU Commission has said that while existing ESFI project commitments will be maintained, the activities of the EIB in the UK will be the subject of negotiations following activation of Article 50 of the EU Treaty.
This spells wide-scale uncertainty for many projects with a real risk that many will need to be pulled if EU funding is ultimately withdrawn and not replaced from elsewhere.
The construction industry has benefited from the free movement of labour from the other EU member states. Many skilled and unskilled workers have opted to move here to work on construction projects. Although many builders consider that labour costs remain too high, this addition of flexibility within the work-force has helped attenuate the effect.
At the time of writing, HM Government has not yet activated Article 50 of the EU Treaty, the process which will formally terminate the UK’s membership of the European Union. Once the Government gives its notification under Article 50, it will negotiate the terms of the UK’s continued relationship with the EU. Free movement of workers will be one of the matters up for discussion. It is currently unknown whether EU nationals resident in Britain will be allowed to stay here or face deportation.
Developments will be watched with interest by the industry. There is not only a concern that Brexit could push up hiring costs but also that companies could lose valued employees to the political fall-out of the referendum.
Market access in other Member States
Businesses currently benefit from the provisions on free movement of goods, services, workers and capital in the EU, which enables them to take up opportunities within other member states. The level of flexibility open to cross-border operations will depend very much on the terms of any free trade agreement reached between the UK and EU. Pivotal to market access for EU opportunities are the rules on public procurement, which have required the opening up of bidding for major public contracts to the whole internal market on an equal and transparent basis. It is not clear whether UK firms could be blocked from competing for contract opportunities in continental Europe.
The effect of departure from the EU on foreign direct investment
There are real fears that investors may think twice about the UK as a destination, given the uncertainty over whether it will remain a member of the EU single market. There could be a knock-on effect for the industry as a result. Fewer external investors means reduced demand for UK properties and for the building of new commercial or residential premises.
The Single Environmental Assessment Directive states that environmental assessments must be carried out for specified plans and programmes. Post-Brexit, it is unclear whether the Government will continue to require such assessments to be conducted. The issue is one of immense importance as assessments can extend the time required to complete an infrastructure project and a failure to complete one satisfactorily can lead to a legal challenge and related delay.
It is unclear whether the Government will move to repeal these measures. Whilst a degree of deregulation would be welcomed by many, it would be unpalatable to others. Further, it would require the UK to leave international treaties, such as the Aarhus Convention, on which many of these legislative measures are based in any event. Politically that could be very difficult.
In our view, it is imperative that the Government moves quickly in order to address the deep concerns held by the industry. These are undermining growth in a strategically important part of the economy and one which is essential to ensuring that the country has the infrastructure and facilities necessary to meet the needs of its population. Prior to the referendum, assurances were given by the Leave campaign that there would be no need to remove EU citizens from the UK and that national Government could match the funding provided by EU bodies in all areas. It would greatly assist the house-building and construction industries sectors if these words could be matched by concrete guarantees that protecting the sector will be a cornerstone of building a prosperous post-Brexit Britain.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
International Arbitration in India and Around the World
Rupa Lakha joined the panel discussing the latest developments in construction and dispute resolution.
Collateral Warranties – Are they also a ‘Construction Contract’?
What are collateral warranties and what do they mean for your construction contracts? Read more here.
Construct.Law - Summer 2021
Click here to read the summer edition of our construction & infrastructure publication - Construct.law
Powering Real Estate
Is it plausible to meet the governments ambitious plan to get new houses off the gas grid by 2025? Watch our webinar here
Andrew Keeley writes for Construction News on the Supreme Court's decision in Triple Point Technology, Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd
The Supreme Court recently delivered its highly anticipated judgement in Triple Point Technology, Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd.
Steven Carey quoted by Construction Law on the risk of an increase in disputes over the materials shortage in the construction sector
Shortages of materials will likely lead to an increase in disputes as projects suffer ensuing disruption.
Chris Hadnutt writes for Building on whether liquidated damages clauses survive termination of contract
Chris Hadnutt considers whether liquidated damages clauses survive termination of contract.
LIDW21: A view from London and India
Watch the discussion on the challenges of the possible rise in disputes in the construction and infrastructure sector in India.
Construction Post Pandemic: 'Great Expectations' or 'Bleak House'?
Watch the discussion on construction post pandemic for the UK and internationally.
Building Safety and the “Golden Thread”
What you should be doing now
Mock Conference with Counsel
An authentic insight into common challenges facing developer clients.
“Subject to Contract” does not amount to an agreement
What does the recent Aqua Leisure International Limited v Benchmark Leisure Limited mean and what practical tips can be taken?
Christopher Busaileh writes for Building on the issues of including liquidated damages clauses in subcontracts
There are a number of specific issues that need to be considered for a main contractor looking to include LADs clauses in subcontracts.
Disputes under more than one contract
Jurisdictional issues to remember if considering adjudication
James Worthington writes for Construction News on the way in which the courts will handle leaseholder claims relating to defective cladding
Defective cladding: how will the courts handle leaseholder claims?
Rupa Lakha quoted by Legal Week on the liberalisation of the Indian legal market
The proposed trade deal could be “the proper catalyst for liberalisation”.
Rachel Warren quoted by Construction Law on the increasing pressure on the HSE over Covid deaths
The Health & Safety Executive is likely to face increasing pressure to take enforcement action where employees have died from Covid.
Steven Carey writes for Building on whether a company can provide expert services in claims for and against the same party
A recent appeal case looked at whether a company can provide expert services in claims for and against the same party.