The Audio-Visual Media Services Directive
For most of us, the way we consume traditional media has changed. Behind us are the days of audio-visual entertainment being delivered only by scheduled programming. Traditional methods of broadcasting have been shaken up by the rise of social media platforms, on-demand streaming services and other unprecedented audio-visual service providers. This note examines the adaptations the Audio-Visual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) has undertaken to match this market shift and its continued impact on audio-visual service providers moving forward.
What is it?
The AVMSD is the EU’s legal framework which establishes the foundational principles for a safe, open and diverse audio-visual media landscape across Europe. Prior to its amendment in 2018, the AVMSD was limited in its application to regulating traditional audio-visual media providers. However, the 2018 Directive extended its applicability to video-sharing platforms (VSPs).
Despite the UK’s departure from the EU on 31 January 2020, the Directive must still be implemented prior to the effective date of 19 September 2020. This is because the implementation date falls within the UK - EU transition period, throughout which most EU laws remain applicable in the UK.
Who does it cover?
Alongside covering traditional broadcasters, the amended AVMSD extends its applicability to VSPs. VSPs are defined as commercial services addressed to the public, containing the following features:
- The platform stores large volumes of user-generated videos, for which the platform itself does not have editorial control;
- The content of the platform is organised and shared in a way determined by the algorithms designed by the service provider (for sharing, tagging, commenting etc.);
- The platform is accessible by electronic communications networks; and
- The principal aim of the service being to provide user generated videos or other audio-visual content with the purpose of informing, entertaining or educating the general public.
The Directive will now therefore bring the likes of YouTube, Facebook, Netflix and Twitch within its grasps.
What does it require?
In relation to any audio-visual content, user generated videos or indeed any audio-visual commercial communications (effectively advertising), VPS’s must now put in place appropriate measures to, amongst others:
- Protect the public at large from incitement of violence or other forms of hatred;
- Protect the public at large from receiving the dissemination of content which constitutes criminal activity, namely, the provocation of terrorist activities, racism and xenophobia;
- Protect minors from harmful content; and
- Ensure the prohibition of advertising products such as cigarettes, electronic cigarettes and alcohol (where such marketing is tailored towards minors or excessive consumption).
It is important to note however, that the measures are drafted in such a way as to prevent the occurrence of harm, rather than to prevent the creation of harmful content itself.
The UK’s Response
The UK government had initially proposed to implement the AVMSD through regulation contained in its Online Harms White Paper, released in April 2019. However, the government swiftly concluded in July 2019 that an interim approach to enforce the Directive would be more effective. Consequently, the government has decided that it will implement the new VSP requirements in the most straightforward manner, in compliance with the minimum requirements of the AVMSD. As expected, Ofcom will be the national regulator and will have the power to appoint a co-regulator to cover VSPs.
With the unprecedented inclusion of VSPs, we are likely to see increasing numbers of these platforms introduce, if they have not already done so:
- Terms and conditions tailored to the prohibition of harmful content;
- Requirements for content creators to declare whether their content contains audio-visual commercial communication;
- Elaborate flagging mechanisms, potentially incorporating community driven review and subsequent content removal processes for any flagged content; and
- Unprecedented age verification systems.
With the additional complication of ‘user generated content’ and lack of editorial control, VSPs are likely to face increased difficulty in ensuring that its community abide by the new requirements.
Whilst it remains unclear what form the practicalities of the regulation will take, the AVMSD does present an interesting advance in the commonly debated topic of social media censorship and regulation. Perhaps a precedent has been set by the EU, which other countries may follow, towards bringing the seemingly global platforms within the scope of traditional regulation.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Stop, collaborate and listen: Top 10 Tips with Collaboration Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips on collaboration agreements - what should you know?
Fiona Edmond and Mark Smith write for Property Week on data centres as an infrastructure asset class
The complexity of operational issues is something those new to the sector may not anticipate and interest is likely to increase.
Preparing your company for sale
We set out here some initial steps to consider in anticipation of a sale.
ESG investment and the challenges for trustees
What challenges does the ESG revolution present for trustees of private family trusts?
The impact of COVID-19 on commercial and residential tenancies
What impact has COVID-19 had on commercial and residential tenancies? Read more here.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises discoverIE on its acquisition of Antenova
discoverIE is a leading international designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics to industry.
Q&A: Separate blocks, common parts and enfranchisement
Miriam Seitler and Lauren Fraser answer queries relating to leaseholders seeking to acquire the freehold.
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
The family court’s role in micro managing 'trivial' disputes
The recent decision has dealt with the family court’s role in micro managing “trivial” disputes in relation to children
Gareth Mills writes for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on technology disputes in Bahrain
The most common disputes occur following perceived or actual failures to deliver required technology services an lack of clarity.
Taxing horizons and fiscal black holes
A super-massive black hole at the centre of the nation’s finances means that tax reform and rates rises look increasingly likely.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Acora on acquisition of Westgate IT
Westgate IT specialises in providing IT support to businesses in the South West.
Jason Saiban writes for Food Manufacture on the food industry's climate change challenge
The key challenge will be how the environmental targets are actually met.
Q&A: Wrestling with restrictive covenants
Camilla Lamont (barrister at Landmark Chambers) and Real Estate Disputes Partner Emma Humphreys answer a pair of covenant queries
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Grape Paradise on the acquisition of a fine wine business
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised Grape Paradise on the acquisition of the Sarment Group in the China Mainland territories.
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
Collateral Warranties – Are they also a ‘Construction Contract’?
What are collateral warranties and what do they mean for your construction contracts? Read more here.
eCommerce and the Post-Brexit State of Play
Key UK and EU legislation governing how online platforms deal with consumers and their business users.